President Obama had recently announced his plan to reform public schooling in the United States. I recognise so much in what Obama is saying and I am staggered that a Democratic President is so willing to stand up to the powerful American teacher unions on issues like performance pay. Obama wants to spend federal dollars on, amongst other things, evaluating teachers and awarding performance bonuses to principals and teachers who have earned them. This is music to the ears of someone like myself. So different from the 2004 presidential campaign when the Democratic candidate, John Kerry, well defeated by President Bush, said in a moment of candour that he could see merit in performance pay for teachers. Kerry was immediately summoned back to Washington to be thrashed by the teacher unions and threatened with having union funds cut off from his campaign. Bloomberg and Klein comment that in New York City schools are graded A to F based on how well their students are learning. Principals and teachers in schools with high grades become eligible for performance bonuses. Schools with failing grades have their principals replaced and in some cases are simply closed down. Over the last seven years more than 90 schools have been closed down in New York City. Even more important is the fact that the new schools which have replaced them are producing dramatically better results than the ones that were closed down were producing. It is actually a simple formula. All it requires is a bit of political courage.
And there is something else that Obama wants to encourage. He wants States to develop systems of teacher evaluation that judge teachers in part on the basis of student performance. In my view the ultimate test of a teacher is how well they make youngsters learn. Or, to quote Bloomberg and Klein directly, “this will go a long way toward improving teacher quality”.
I see judging teachers by how well their students learn and performance pay as two sides of the same coin. At present, once a teacher starts teaching the only mechanism which determines how much they are paid is their years in the job. For too long now years in the job have equated to experience, which is then equated to competence and effectiveness. I am of an age now that means I have come to value experience enormously. But only a particular type of experience – that accompanied by wisdom. And all the experience that I gained over more than 30 years in teaching has year by year made me more convinced that until we link teacher pay to competence and to whether students are learning or not and break the link to years in the job, we will not be able to reshape teaching into the modern profession it needs to become if all of our children are not just to learn, but to also acquire the knowledge and skill needed to compete in an increasingly global workforce.
Efforts by successive New Zealand Governments to bring about some sort of reform of the schooling system have been characterised by good intentions, vociferous political argument and significant increases in the spending of taxpayers’ money. These efforts have also been characterised by the minimal success that they have achieved. And why has that success been minimal?
Part of the answer lies in our unwillingness to confront the reality that some of our schools are failing and when we are finally forced to do so our lack of timeliness in acting decisively. There are so many examples of failing schools being left to fail while we wait for the principal to retire in his or her good time. I suppose that is at least an acknowledgment that the quality of the principal does matter. But in the meantime what happens to the children stranded in those schools? Too many of them become statistics of failure. That is why I like the New York approach. Replace the leaders of schools which are failing, if necessary close the schools down themselves. I actually disagree with the view that such decisions are hard ones. They are not hard, they are just right.
The other part of the answer lies in our willingness to pay teachers just for how long they have been in the job with no regard for their competence, their ability and their energy. That is why I applaud President Obama’s desire to award performance bonuses to those principals and teachers who have earned them. Just maybe this President will do what his recent Democratic predecessors have not been inclined to do – challenge the very historically powerful American teacher unions.
And a final thought – maybe performance pay for teachers is just the final drive that is needed to make National Standards actually achieve their objective of reducing the number of New Zealand youngsters who are not learning to read, write and do maths.
5 comments:
Sadly, none of President Obama's ideas will be adopted here, as National as well as Labour lack the willingness to stand up to the N.Z.E.I or P.P.T.A. We are also willing to constantly lower the expectation level of attainment, so that nobody is deemed a failure. As a teacher aide, I was appalled at the idea of taking 6 weeks, to learn something that elsewhere would be learned in about a week.
When is the National Party as Government going to adopt an Education policy which mirrors Peachey's thoughts above? Reward for merit is the only real incentive to extract success out of earnest endeavours. This psychologically is a proven fact of many decades standing. One would have thought that people as supposedley intelligent as our teachers would have readily grasped this. Instead they hide behind the shibboleths of outdated political protective dogma. Wish they would arrive in the "new age."
The asnwer is simple - we need a new Minister of education - I wonder who?
Duncan
Take care there Duncan .. the incumbent has limitations but what evidence is there of a better alternative in National? And I always thought National Standards were just as much about Bill English as anyone else!
"Principals and teachers in schools with high grades become eligible for performance bonuses"
Presumably meaning in NZ that the stampede of teachers to high decile schools will only increase.
" Efforts by successive New Zealand Governments to bring about some sort of reform of the schooling system have been characterised by good intentions, vociferous political argument and significant increases in the spending of taxpayers’ money. These efforts have also been characterised by the minimal success that they have achieved. And why has that
success been minimal? "
Take National Standards for example!
"Replace the leaders of schools which are failing, if necessary close the schools down themselves."
Yeah right - and write off millions of dollars of investment in plant - and rob the community of a local facility!!
I am sure the teaching profession would be fine with performance pay if the performance pay was allocated the same way as it is to the parasites that can be found at the top (or should that be bottom?) of the food chain in the out of control capitalist system that is currently destroying every aspect of civil society. For example.. bring Wall St to its knees through greed and poor decision making....keep your job and add another zero to your salary.....carve great lumps off the share price of Telecom get paid $5.4 million and have a trout fishing trip. Performance pay is a misnomer even when applied to the business world where the bottom line can be calculated easily and unambiguously. As you would know after your many years in the profession the learning of a student is not necessarily clearly indicated by their assessment results, and the learning itself is much a more complex business than the relentless pursuit of profit.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.