The collection of rates on Maori land is a problem that
local councils have been wrestling with for many years. The problem is a large
amount of the rates due on Maori freehold land is never paid - estimated at $65
million nationwide. That's a $65 million hole other ratepayers must fill -
otherwise worthy community projects that should happen, don't.
Maori
freehold land is land classed as such by the Maori Land Court. It is subject to
special rules around how the land can be sold, transferred or passed on to
family members. Those rules are intended to retain the ownership of land by Maori.
The way things work with general freehold land is
that if a landowner does not pay their rates, council goes through debt
collection proceedings and if necessary forces the sale of the property to
recover the arrears.
That is not the case for Maori freehold land. A
council is prevented by law from selling the land to recover unpaid rates. It must instead go through debt recovery from each of the multiple
owners, and it can only demand
the rates in proportion to their fractional ownership. This makes recovery
impractical.
Where the land is being used, a local authority may
attempt to recover the rates from the person using it. I say may because there is no requirement for
the owners of the land to disclose who is using it!
Special rules also apply where the Maori freehold
land is owned by a trust. In this case the trust only has to pay rates from income
it receives from the land - so if it does not receive any income it does not
have to pay rates. This is not the case for a trust owning general freehold land on behalf of
multiple owners - income does not matter in the slightest and a council would
pursue the trustees for unpaid rates and potentially force the sale of the land.
Papers tabled to the Far North District Council in
2010 say this, "Much Maori freehold land in the Far North is owned by
trusts. Land can be used but managed so trusts receive no revenue - no revenue
no rates. Occupiers of land owned by trusts cannot be made to pay rates. Trusts
can be used by Maori land owners to avoid paying rates."
In practice councils have been going through the farcical
process of sending rate demands for Maori freehold land, but not enforcing it.
As a consequence every year they write off those rates that have been unpaid
for six or more years. In effect, the payment of rates on Maori freehold land
has become voluntary. An example of this
in the Whangarei District is a well-to-do family owning Maori freehold land not
paying rates despite the property having multiple baches and permanent
residences.
Now central government is reviewing that situation. According to Local Government NZ:
"Cabinet is
considering a number of changes to the rating and valuation of Māori freehold
land. These are intended to create a
valuation and rating framework that more fairly reflects the social, cultural
and general heritage factors associated with Māori land and include:
Providing councils with
the discretion to:
•
Non-rate Māori land that is unoccupied and unused.
•
Remove rates arrears on that unoccupied and [un]used
Māori land.
Cabinet is also proposing
to:
•
Remove the 2ha limit for non-rating of marae and
urupa...
•
Develop a new valuation process for Māori
land."
In other words, instead of working on solutions to enable
the collection of rates on Maori freehold land, the intention is to legalise
the non-collection, permit local councils to exempt Maori land from rates, and
allow councils to write off the existing arrears immediately rather than wait
six years.
The issue regarding a "new valuation
process" for Maori land is an interesting one. The Auckland City Council
has this to say:
"An adjustment to the council valuation of Māori freehold
land is made to align with the 'Mangatu' court [of Appeal] decision...The
adjustment to value reflects the difficulty of selling the land due to multiple
owners and sites of cultural significance. The guidelines set down by the
Valuer-General allow up to a 15% discount to Māori freehold land."
The same concessions should apply to land owners
generally, where the circumstances are similar. In a colour-blind
society all land owners would be rated equally - where the rules for rating general freehold land are
the same as those for Maori freehold land. That seems more like an ideal than a
reality.
3 comments:
Look Frank, does Kelvin Davis need to tell you again. There is no such thing as Maori privilege. You are making things up again, you white men are all raceeist.
I fail to understand why maori have to pay rates to a foreign settler entity who has no laws or constitution to rule over us...is it called settler privlage?
Is sarcasm acceptable according to your rules?
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.