How unsurprising it is to have a
new Minister of Housing who says he has the answer to our housing shortage. The
solution, he claims, is factory built prefabricated housing.
Minister Phil Twyford told the
gathering at the PrefabNZ's annual conference, "This is not some science fiction dream. We can do this, if we
have a bit of backbone and pursue the right policies". He continued, "KiwiBuild using mass procurement gives
us the opportunity to build at scale, with contract work at volume, and with
the certainty of multi-year contracts, which will allow firms to invest in the
technology, the production processes, and design, and business models, that
will transform your industry."
Perhaps it was a case of the
Minister saying what his audience wanted to hear. I agree with the Minister
that if housing is to be more affordable it will require "a bit of backbone” and “the
right policies", and I agree that prefabricated housing may go some
way to reducing housing costs.
However, I do not share the
Minister's view that this is the solution and I doubt that the new government
has the backbone to pursue the policies required to bring about a significant reduction
in housing costs.
The causes of our high housing
costs are now so entrenched that change would need to be revolutionary. It
would need to reverse the huge increase in red tape that National introduced
during its nine years in government and it would need to abandon the Resource Management
Act which has choked development. Neither of those things is likely to happen,
so don't expect the housing shortfall to be corrected anytime soon, unless it’s
due to some other factor like a significant reversal in immigration numbers.
The reality is that building is expensive.
According to buildingguide.co.nz it costs about $3,000 per square metre to
build a 150 m2 single story home on a flat section with a "medium"
quality of fit out. That's $450,000, before GST. The government's tax take would
be worth another $67,500, which takes the cost to $3,450 m2.
Going for a high quality of fit
out (custom made kitchen, quality bathrooms, etc) will add another
$1,000-$1,500 m2 (plus GST).
Given most people nowadays tend
to have homes of about 200 m2, the building cost will set them back about $862,500
($750,000 plus GST).
Then there is the section price. Thanks
to the Resource Management Act the average new section costs is in the order of
$250,000 to $300,000. Most of the development cost is in the holding costs
incurred while dealing with the bureaucracy involved in gaining consent.
The Minister seems to think
pre-fabricated housing is the future. Truth is, there are lots of companies
doing it now - building basic houses in a factory and transporting them in a
near finished state to a site. For example, the largest home a local pre-fab' company
makes is about 100 m2. It costs $2,400 m2.
Not included in that cost,
however, is: interior and exterior painting, floor coverings, hot water
cylinder, plumbing and tapware, spouting, water supply, septic tank or
connections to council system, electrical metre board, phone, whiteware,
curtains/blinds, decks and verandas, footpaths, landscaping, washing line,
council fees, house delivery costs and pile foundations.
My guess is that these would add
another $600 m2 to the cost of the home taking it to $3,000 m2 or about
$300,000. I doubt that a new build of what is a very small 100m2 home with a
very basic fit out could be done much cheaper, unless one were to do it oneself
which is now pretty difficult given the current regulatory requirements of the
Building Act. Add to that the cost of a section and I am unsure how the
Minister of Housing thinks factory built homes is the answer to affordable
housing.
A "low-cost" land and
building package nowadays is anything under $600,000. A pretty typical build is
more like $900,000 to $1m. The only way
housing costs are going to go down is if the Minister develops some backbone
and addresses the real issues that are causing building and land costs to be so
high.
The reality is that he is not
going to be able to reduce building costs. Builder registration and the lack of
trades training have created the perfect storm for builders to increase their
hourly rate - and they have. They are unlikely to drop those rates, and the
Minister hasn't given any indication that he intends addressing such matters.
The Minister has also given no
indication that he intends forcing councils to reduce their fees - or that he
is going to fundamentally reform planning rules to make it faster and less
bureaucratic for developers to turn bare land into housing.
The only way the Minister will be
able to make housing more affordable is to remove the biggest single cost which
is GST on new housing (yeah right!) or have KiwiBuild make tiny houses and
place them on tiny sections - which for some people will be a very good
solution if they don't have energetic kiddies requiring space. For the rest, we
will have to do what people have always done, say "Yes Minister", work
hard, save hard, and be realistic about what we can afford.
Frank
Newman, an investment analyst and former councillor on the Whangarei
District Council, writes a weekly article for Property Plus.
5 comments:
Agree. Council delays big problem/costs.
Six weeks, 3 applications rejected, one because council using old Adobe and could not open file, consent application accepted 7 working days ago.
Just to demolish a shed for access to a back section.
@Anonymous
There is one thing that you have left out which started the housing crisis, successive governments allowing non NZ citizens to buy up NZ property for speculative purposes and uncontrolled immigration of people who have nothing to give to the country in return - all to boost political votes to remain in power, personal greed at the expence of NZ citizens quality of life!
Rex
I have just purchased two Keith Hay three bedroom homes at a cost of $2220 per square meter. They are complete and ready to live in with decks. The eye watering costs are planning & council fees which add another $450 per meter
Frank, I think your building costs are too high. You are just accepting the bloated building costs that arise as the result of a property bubble.
50 years ago the average house cost 3 times the average salary. Why could we do it then and not now?
Also, I think you are missing the infrastructure costs, which the government cannot afford anyway because it is spending too much on super and welfare. People (especially in Auckland) are paying a massive premium for more reasonable commute times. If the government hasn't built the roads etc then affordable houses (in say satellite towns) will have unacceptable commute times.
There is more to the equation than you mention. 50 years of neglect and incompetence by Labour and National will take another 50 years to unravel (but there is unlikely to be the political will to do so).
I agree though, Phil Twitford will achieve little.
Fear not you mere mortals, Crusher Collins is the shadow minister for RMA reform. Exactly how she is going to do that in opposition beats the hell out of me, she didn't have much luck whilst in power for nine years.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.