Dear Associate Professor
Leonie Pihama and Associate Professor Tom Roa,
You have both seized the
opportunity you perceive in the recent appalling tragedy in Christchurch to
present what one of you calls “colonial terror and violence since 1642”[1] with the other saying “Maori
had been victims to acts of terrorism in Aotearoa in the past”.[2] And Police Deputy
Commissioner of Maori and Ethnic Services Wally Haumaha chimes in, about
“historical killings of Maori at different times and across the country during
early colonisation”.[3]
Well, now, perhaps it is
timely for us to look with care at these allegations. Profesor Roa refers to “the attacks on
Parihaka and Rangioawhia”. Of the latter
he says “In 1864 Crown troops set fire to a whare karakia .. during morning
prayer, incinerating non-combatants, including tamariki and kaumatua. ...[A]n eight year-old boy ran out of the
whare ... and he was shot dead”. Well no, Professor Roa, on several counts. Your “whare karakia” was actually a gunpit,
full of armed rebels and a “kaumatua” inside, one Hoani Papita, shot dead
Sergeant McHale who invited him to surrender, thus starting the conflict in
which the whare and those inside were incinerated.[4] The boy, Potatau, ran out safely with his
parents earlier when invited to do so.
Many years later he told his story in which the humanity of the troops
was abundantly clear.[5] So, Professor, if your story is what you tell
your students, you are deceiving them and inciting racial hatred into the
bargain. The action at Rangioawhia was
actually a humanitarian effort by General Cameron[6] to defeat the Waikato rebels
by destroying their food supplies, thus avoiding a direct attack on their fort
at Paterangi which would have caused many deaths on both sides.
And Parihaka? Its inhabitants were squatters on Government
land. Far from the haven of peace which so many claim today, it was actually
the centre of a rather nasty cult, ruled by fear, not love. “They adhere to Te
Whiti and obey him because they dare not do otherwise. ...[T]he horrible dread of being makutued,
bewitched, or bedevilled to death is an ever-present fear.”[7] “It is evident from the quantity of arms
seized that the Natives were by no means so unprepared for the eventuality of
war as has sometimes been represented.”[8] As Homi, son-in-law of Tohu said at Te
Whiti’s funeral: These men were
past masters in word-painting; that is all! You have been deceived.”[9] Again,
the occupation of Parihaka followed a humane plan by Government leader, Bryce,
to assemble sufficient force to make it apparent that any resistance would be
futile. This succeeded brilliantly; as
is well known, the only casualty being a
boy whose foot was accidentally trodden on by a trooper’s horse. Yet you, Professor Roa, state “The Māori world remembers the theft and killings at
Parihaka”.[10] A memory lapse perhaps?
Are these “acts of terrorism
in Aotearoa in the past” of which “Maori had been victims”, Professor? I don’t think so. There
were such in colonial times - the night-time attack by Te Kooit’s rebels on
Matawhero with the slaughter of seventy sleeping residents, half of them
Maori. And children were not
spared. At Mohaka, the three Lavin boys
were killed by throwing them in the air and impaling them on bayonets.[11] Three Gilfillan children
were tomahawked to death at Wanganui on 18th April 1847.[12] On 13th February 1869, a
Waikato/Maniapoto war party led by one Wetere Te Rerenga butchered the three
Gascoigne children, their parents and two unarmed men at Whitecliffs and then
proceeded to slay missionary Whiteley who had served the native people for 30
years.[13] The perpetrators avoided punishment. Waikato/Maniapoto, Tom? Your tribe, I think.
Now Professor Pihama, talking
of “colonial terror and violence since 1642” can only be referring in the first
instance to the slaughter of one of Tasman’s boat’s crews by Tumatakokori. Now
that’s curious, isn’t it? And
Tumatakokori themselves were exterminated as a tribe by Ngai Tahu about 1800 in
a battle in the Paparoas.[14]
Then, 127 years or about five
generations after Tasman, the first Maori fell to the gun of a European in
Poverty Bay when he attacked one of Captain Cook’s cutters with only four
unarmed boys aboard and was shot by the alert coxswain. An act of “colonial terror and violence”,
Professor Pihama?
Indeed, a couple of years
later, a substantial number of Ngati Pou
were killed by Frenchmen valiantly defending their hospital on Moturua Island
against ten times their number, after their Captain, Marion du Fresne, had been
killed and eaten for unwittingly breaking a tapu.[15] “Colonial terror and violence”, Leonie?
Now, learned Associate
Professors, although you make no reference to it, you are surely aware that New
Zealand’s history did not begin in 1840.
Cast your minds back only a couple of decades and consider some events
of those times with barely a European in sight.
Thus in 1822, Hongi Hika and his Ngapuhi, well armed with muskets he had
bought by astute trading, attacked the formidable Matakitaki Pa of the Waikato,
said to be the refuge of as many as ten thousand including many women and
children..[16] Virtually defenceless, in “their mad panic
hundreds of the fleeing Waikato ... were smothered in one of the deep ditches
of the defences or were shot by the merciless Ngapuhi, who fired down upon the
writhing mass till tired of reloading.”[17] “[M]ost of the Waikato” died.[18] Now THAT surely qualifies as “terror and
violence” - and against your own people so surely you have not forgotten??
But Waikato had their moment
of glory. In revenge for an earlier
defeat, in 1831 they attacked the great Te Ati Awa pa of Pukerangiora. After a three-month siege the starving defenders
broke and ran, 200 dying immediately,
Waikato chief Te Wherowhero, later the first Maori “king”, smashing the
skulls of more than one hundred until his arm got tired. Huge numbers of the dead were gutted and
spit-roasted over fires for a cannibal feast.[19] Now THAT you must surely agreed, qualifies as
“terror and violence” with not a wicked colonial in sight!
And on it went. In 1835 two
subtribes of Te Ati Awa had their turn as conquerors too when they invaded the
Chatham Islands. About 1600 innocent and genuinely pacifist islanders were soon
reduced by systematic slaughter and cannibalism to a mere 101.[20] “Terror and violence” - by a Maori invasion
of another people’s land. Some
colonisation! Would you deny it?
“J’accuse!”[21]. I accuse you of using the tragic events in
Christchurch for an inexcusable attempt to advance a racist political agenda
and in contempt of all the fine principles of scholarship which a university
should stand by. I am sickened by its
hypocrisy.
Yours sincerely,
Bruce Moon
[2] T. Roa, RNZ News, 21/3/19
[3] W. Haumaha, “Stiff”, op.cit.
[4] Two men did emerge late from the whare and
were shot by the troops, enraged to see their colonel fall mortally wounded and
their comrades killed.
[5] Potatau, “Brett’s Historical Series”,
Auckland, 1890
[6] F.Glen, “Australians at war in New
Zealand,”,willsonscott, 2011, p.146
[7] “Otago Daily Times”, 9/11/1881. Note that this account was compiled from a
reporter on the spot just four days after the occupation by Government
authorities.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Homi, Hawera & Normanby Star, 1907, 5
[10] T. Roa,Te ao Maorinews, 21 March 2019
[11] A. Plover,
“Blood and Tears”,Tross, 2018, p. 121.
[12] Ibid., p.57
[14] W.J. Elvy, “Kei Puta te Wairau”,
Cadsonbury,1957, p.27
[15] I. Wishart, “The Great Divide”, Howling at
the Moon Publishing, 2012, Chapter Three
[17] W.P Reeves, The Long White Cloud”, 1898, p.
113
[18] L.G.Kelly. J. Polynesian Soc., 40, 157, 1931,
p.55
[21] Emil Zola to the President of France on the
miscarriage of justice in the Dreyfus trial, 1898
4 comments:
I am a decendant from the Ngati Papakura tribe and have relied on Professor Tom Roa's telling of the Rangioawhia massacre. It is important to me to be able to understand the truth about my ancestors. Thank you for what appears to be an unbiased and honest retelling of what actually happened.
Dave Carroll
Bruce, thank you!!! New Zealand is so much better off with you around. Who would be able to fight back against these liars and hypocrites but you. We are so indebted to you!
This is helpful, thank you.
I'm so saddened that the current mainstream media ignore the truth and haven't said a word about the racist hateful lies by Professor Leonie Pihama and Associate Professor Tom Roa.
An excellent article on your part Bruce Thank you for the great effort.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.