Our Prime Minister assures farmers and small business owners
that they have “nothing to fear’ from a proposed capital gains tax.
But they have much to fear.
Why? Because small businesses already have to deal with an
overwhelmingly onerous, highly regressive, taxation compliance regime, to which
they must conform, at considerable cost ,with significant financial and
personal penalties if they do not.
These include company tax; income tax on salaries and
drawings; fringe benefit tax; goods and services tax(GST); ACC levys; resident
withholding tax on investments or dividends such as a shareholding in a
partnering business; imputation tax issues; employer subsidy contributions ;the
cost of filing annual returns; franchise fees. The list goes on and on.
The cost of complying with these government requirements is
already astronomical for small businesses. The Cullen-led Tax Working Group
appears to be both ignorant of and unsympathetic to the fact that these
compliance costs are hugely regressive. The cost of compliance as a proportion
of turnover is far higher for small businesses than for larger businesses.
Small businesses account for 50-60%of all employees. They
provide us with personal services, shops, restaurants, and trades, to name just
a few.
Imagine your community without these facilities?
Small business ownership is hazardous. Of 100 new start-ups
this year, more than 80% will not survive the first five years.-an alarming failure
rate. The social cost is extremely high.
So, why, then, would a person seek to start a new small
business? Unemployment is one reason. Independence is the most often quoted
reason. Testing an innovative idea is also significant. Many entrepreneurs attempt
to sell their nascent businesses to a larger organisation which can develop their
innovation. But this step will inevitably attract CGT. This very fact could constitute a
significant brake on innovation and entrepreneurial activity in New Zealand . Did
Cullen and colleagues consider this?
Research also shows that the prize of making a substantial
capital gain when the business is eventually sold, is definitely not a motivational element in starting up a new
enterprise. How can it be, given the almost impossible outcomes which would
need to be overcome to realise such a gain?
The life cycle of the small business has a number of phases:
start up; growth; maturity; and decline.
At some point in the maturity phase,, signs of decline will emerge
such as falling sales, increased competition, changing markets and restrictive
government regulations. The owners must then decide either to continue, try to
expand or to sell up. In a majority of cases, they will decide to simply close
the door, often because family members, having experienced the sheer burden and
sacrifices made, have no desire to take on such burdens themselves.
Perhaps the single biggest issue in applying a CGT to small
businesses is what to tax? And when? Most small businesses have few tangible
assets. Most lease their premises. A small business is very much the
owner/manager and their skills, experience, knowledge and networks. This is
identified as goodwill and increasingly, social capital. The Cullen group
ignores these values. How can a CGT be applied to goodwill and social capital?
The taxation review has been trumpeted as being all about
“fairness”.
But how fair is it to tax the residual value of a business
which has had to survive in an unsympathetic, highly regressive and often
ideologically-hostile environment requiring owners to expend huge personal effort, time and money
over many years, only to find that at the end of a difficult journey, a
rapacious government will requisition 33%
of their realisation, in the name of “fairness”?Applying a CGT to small
businesses will encourage many to simply walk away. What a disaster, in terms
of fewer jobs, reduced community services and a disincentive to
entrepreneurship.
Governments would be well advised to abandon any proposal to
further tax small businesses, if they seek to encourage a vibrant and progressive
small business sector.
And small businesses have nothing to fear?
Martin Devlin is emeritus professor of management from Massey University where he has lectured, conducted research and actively consulted, for 35 years, in the fields of management, entrepreneurship, SMEs and corporate governance.
2 comments:
becoming more communist every day the little bloke is not allowered to make any money
Excellent analysis Martin. Thank you
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.