It's not the news
the Government wants in budget week. The Warehouse is
laying off up to 150 people, and there are potentially more to come as they
restructure their operations looking for efficiencies.
Vodafone has been
in the news for the same thing. Air New Zealand has announced a profit guidance
reduction, and a pay freeze at the top. They won't be the
only ones.
This is an economy
slowing, and one suspects faster than the leaders in Wellington are prepared to
admit. They are currently pedalling the line that international headwinds are
the cause, which is only partially true.
Their polices
aren't helping. The minimum wage rise, the tenancy amendments, the fair pay
legislation, the industrial action we are seeing, the Kiwibuild fiasco, the
petrol tax, the CGT attempt have all added to an economic state that is
increasingly fragile.
The clues were
there last week as Grant Robertson was scrambling around looking for a billion
in low priority spending. Further clues were issued Thursday with the
adjustment to a debt range, as opposed to a 20 percent target.
Now, in the mix
will be individual circumstances. The Warehouse has had a rough old ride over
the years, Air New Zealand has been bailed out, and it's been the toast of the
town. All companies have specific circumstances unique to themselves and/or
their industry.
But the critical role
governments play is in setting the business agenda: whether it is through tax,
economic performance, or, most importantly, confidence.
Confidence in this
government since its formation has been an issue, and it remains an issue to
this day.
Mix that now with
the cold, hard, reality that money is short, the promises are big, and growth
is slowing, and what we need to buckle up for is more news like that of The
Warehouse.
Perhaps one of the
biggest ironies in the middle of all this are the unions, who yet again fail to
see the folly of their approach to business. Having promoted an increase in the
cost of doing business, whether it be through minimum wage rises, the promotion
of the living wage, or support for major industrial reform whereby they get an
increased say in the workplace, they then become outraged when people lose their
jobs.
They can't have it
both ways. The more you pay people, the fewer people you can afford to pay.
Unless of course you sell more, and you only sell more if people feel good
about buying. If only they could, or would, join those dots.
The same applies
to the government. Promise all you want, but you simply have to have an
economic base to pay for it. And it's becoming increasingly clear they don't.
The trouble with
the sort of spending they're into, is it has no return. It's a never-ending
demand for social issues they hold dear. Like the 13,000 more people on the
Jobseeker Benefit who won't work, and they won't ask questions as to why not.
Like social housing whereby you can once again stay for life because they don't
ask you to move on.
Big layoffs have
not been a part of the political discourse for years because we have had a
rock-star economy. In 18 short months, this lot have managed to bring the
golden days to a grinding halt.
Mike Hosking is a political broadcaster on Newstalk ZB, who
has hosted his number one breakfast show since 2008 - see HERE.
3 comments:
"They can't have it both ways. The more you pay people, the fewer people you can afford to pay. Unless of course you sell more, and you only sell more if people feel good about buying. If only they could, or would, join those dots."
I am right-wing on many issues, but I don't like the way people on the economic right portrays wages as a zero-sum game. In my view, one fundamental problem with New Zealand's economy is its chronic unproductive nature, which I think is perpetuated by labour being too cheap, ultimately meaning that it is very hard to find jobs giving a decent standard of living. New Zealand is still focused on low-value-added industries like dairy, forestry etc. What about the possibility that minimum wage rises will push companies to move up the value chain and use more efficient working practices? With New Zealand's economy being one of the freest in the world and having endured Rogernomics and Ruthanasia, it is clear that the old Tea Partyist attitude of "A bit more deregulation here, a bit more tax cutting there" is not the answer by itself.
If "money is short" the Govt could take a leaf out of Key's book & borrow $80 Billion & sell off the remaining shares in the Electricity Cos. Oh & don't run a flag referendum. Also, how come companies are screaming out for workers?
We never had a rock star economy. It was all action without production. The reason we have child poverty and a housing crisis is we have not produced additional wealth to cover our needs let alone our demands. This has been going on for years under both governments. The problem we face is the present government intends to make things worse by reducing the real wealth producing part of the economy and spending more on welfare.
As for the writers theory that the economy can be fixed by raising wages and salaries forcing companies to invest in technology to raise labour productivity there is the problem of how to fund it. We do not have a large risk capital market .Sole proprietors of established business's find it impossible to sell their interests to NZers.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.