It is also clear that the Prime Minister believes she has promises to keep to the victims of the Christchurch Mosque Attacks. From her perspective, legislating against “Hate Speech” is the most important way of keeping those promises.
She’s wrong, of course.
Prime Ministers cannot afford to take things personally. That may sound harsh and unfeeling, but it is, nevertheless, true. As the leader of this country, Jacinda Ardern has a responsibility to honour not just the pain and suffering of the victims of the Christchurch terrorist, but the pain and suffering of the generation of New Zealanders who battled against the most malign terrorist of all time.
Tens-of-thousands of young New Zealanders were killed or wounded in the global struggle against Adolf Hitler. One of the most precious things they were fighting to protect was the first thing Hitler and his fellow Nazis set out to destroy: the right of every human-being to think, speak and communicate freely.
The urge to suppress ideas and beliefs which contradict what one fervently believes to be the truth is not a healthy urge. It is a totalitarian urge. An urge to bend the whole world to your way of thinking. The great danger of succumbing to this urge is that you begin to see those who disagree with you as willful enemies of the truth. Confronted with their dissent, with their deliberate refusal to acknowledge what is self-evidently true, with their hate speech: what else can you do but make sure that the offenders are disciplined and punished?
Tragically, this is the direction in which the Royal Commission of Inquiry Into The Christchurch Mosque Attacks opted to steer the Government. Out of the terrorist’s mayhem, the Royal Commissioners were determined to bring forth what they called “Social Cohesion”. The people of New Zealand, they said, must be brought closer together, and in order for that to happen, all forms of speech which foster division, are insulting, create disharmony, and/or incite discrimination and hate, should be criminalised.
Had the Royal Commission restricted itself to recommending that language intended to incite hatred and/or violence against followers of the Islamic faith be outlawed, it is just possible that New Zealanders would have conceded the point. After all, if the law already forbids such expression in relation to ethnicity, then why not religion? In the dark shadow of the Mosque attacks, surely it would have been the least New Zealanders could do?
But, no. Restricting the extension of the existing law to cover religion was not deemed to be sufficient. The strengthening of New Zealand’s social cohesion would require the creation of a whole swathe of new “protected groups”. To bring the country together, the Royal Commission – and now, seemingly, the Labour Government – is intent on empowering the citizenry to send their neighbours to jail for up to three years for the “crime” of pissing them off.
One can only feel desperately sorry for the Police as women turn on men, Trans on TERFs, Maori on Pakeha, Christians on atheists, supporters of Palestine on supporters of Israel, Baby Boomers on Millennials, and Neoliberals on Marxists. The courts will be filled with angry and bitter complainants and defendants. Juries will be asked to solve problems philosophers have struggled with for centuries. Vast sums of money will be expended on lawyers. No one will emerge from the process emotionally unscathed. And all in the name of strengthening New Zealand’s social cohesion!
It won’t work, Jacinda. No matter how much you’d like it to; no matter how sincere all those promises you made to the victims. It won’t work. You need to listen to those who are warning you that the unintended consequences of this direct attack on the freedom of thought and expression, guaranteed to all New Zealanders in the Bill of Rights Act, will be huge.
Uniformity of belief and behaviour is Xi Jinping’s goal – it shouldn’t be Jacinda Ardern’s.
Freedom is unruly. It’s rude. It hurts people’s feelings. Makes them angry.
But people died for it, Jacinda.
Leave it alone.
She’s wrong, of course.
Prime Ministers cannot afford to take things personally. That may sound harsh and unfeeling, but it is, nevertheless, true. As the leader of this country, Jacinda Ardern has a responsibility to honour not just the pain and suffering of the victims of the Christchurch terrorist, but the pain and suffering of the generation of New Zealanders who battled against the most malign terrorist of all time.
Tens-of-thousands of young New Zealanders were killed or wounded in the global struggle against Adolf Hitler. One of the most precious things they were fighting to protect was the first thing Hitler and his fellow Nazis set out to destroy: the right of every human-being to think, speak and communicate freely.
The urge to suppress ideas and beliefs which contradict what one fervently believes to be the truth is not a healthy urge. It is a totalitarian urge. An urge to bend the whole world to your way of thinking. The great danger of succumbing to this urge is that you begin to see those who disagree with you as willful enemies of the truth. Confronted with their dissent, with their deliberate refusal to acknowledge what is self-evidently true, with their hate speech: what else can you do but make sure that the offenders are disciplined and punished?
Tragically, this is the direction in which the Royal Commission of Inquiry Into The Christchurch Mosque Attacks opted to steer the Government. Out of the terrorist’s mayhem, the Royal Commissioners were determined to bring forth what they called “Social Cohesion”. The people of New Zealand, they said, must be brought closer together, and in order for that to happen, all forms of speech which foster division, are insulting, create disharmony, and/or incite discrimination and hate, should be criminalised.
Had the Royal Commission restricted itself to recommending that language intended to incite hatred and/or violence against followers of the Islamic faith be outlawed, it is just possible that New Zealanders would have conceded the point. After all, if the law already forbids such expression in relation to ethnicity, then why not religion? In the dark shadow of the Mosque attacks, surely it would have been the least New Zealanders could do?
But, no. Restricting the extension of the existing law to cover religion was not deemed to be sufficient. The strengthening of New Zealand’s social cohesion would require the creation of a whole swathe of new “protected groups”. To bring the country together, the Royal Commission – and now, seemingly, the Labour Government – is intent on empowering the citizenry to send their neighbours to jail for up to three years for the “crime” of pissing them off.
One can only feel desperately sorry for the Police as women turn on men, Trans on TERFs, Maori on Pakeha, Christians on atheists, supporters of Palestine on supporters of Israel, Baby Boomers on Millennials, and Neoliberals on Marxists. The courts will be filled with angry and bitter complainants and defendants. Juries will be asked to solve problems philosophers have struggled with for centuries. Vast sums of money will be expended on lawyers. No one will emerge from the process emotionally unscathed. And all in the name of strengthening New Zealand’s social cohesion!
It won’t work, Jacinda. No matter how much you’d like it to; no matter how sincere all those promises you made to the victims. It won’t work. You need to listen to those who are warning you that the unintended consequences of this direct attack on the freedom of thought and expression, guaranteed to all New Zealanders in the Bill of Rights Act, will be huge.
Uniformity of belief and behaviour is Xi Jinping’s goal – it shouldn’t be Jacinda Ardern’s.
Freedom is unruly. It’s rude. It hurts people’s feelings. Makes them angry.
But people died for it, Jacinda.
Leave it alone.
Chris Trotter is a political commentator who blogs at bowalleyroad.blogspot.co.nz.
6 comments:
So, according to Chris, the only reason Jacinda wants to enact the Hate Speech Law is to prevent a future terror attack happening in NZ and to keep her promises to the victims. Despite there being no evidence that the Christchurch attack would have been prevented if this law had been in place.
Extremists may not be known for their logic and intelligence but at least some are certainly capable of figuring out that they say nothing and keep their plans secret prior to taking action.
The PM seems happy to grossly reduce and criminalise everyone else's freedoms of speech, expression and opinion, which are crucial to an open and healthy democracy, in the name of supposedly protecting a small minority. In fact, the hate speech law will likely make it harder to identify potential REAL offenders because, like the rest of us, they'll keep their views to themselves and go underground.
This is woke politics in a nutshell. Penalise and punish the vast majority to supposedly address a threat or discrimination to a small minority.
I'm more cynical than Chris, and I know Jacinda isn't ruled just by her heart. Come on...no politician is and certainly not a Prime Minister. They have hard choices to make all the time and their principal aim in a liberal democracy should be to rule for the majority. They should aim to improve things for minority groups but NEVER at the expense of the majority.
This government fails on this all the time and the He Puapua report exposes a plan to rule principally for one minority, ALWAYS at the expense of the majority.
Their ideological agenda does not fit with a true democracy. And the only way they will be able to enact it completely is if they muzzle free speech and opinion and intimidate people against speaking out by threatening them with jail time.
Jacinda doesn't seem so kind and caring now, I suggest. She's a calculating, career politician with an extreme agenda and she'll do whatever it takes to achieve it...in as "kind" a way, as possible!
I was understand that the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the mosque attacks stated clearly that Hate Speech Laws would not have prevented the attacks; they would have succeeded anyway. So let's not use this one act of terrorism as an excuse to outlaw free speech. Ardern et al just want control of all facets of life in New Zealand. She is a Communist who considers that everyone else should be one also. If she wants a Communist State to live in, there is one called North Korea. She and her ilk can go there, no one is stopping them. Communism has failed in USSR, North Korea, Cuba with the murder of millions of innocent people as the only real outcome, and China is another Communist State that kills its own people in the millions. It's not the ordinary people doing this but the Dear Leaders and Ardern wishes to become another Dear Leader.
I totally agree with Deem (as always)...the PM is far more calculating... Hate Speech is all about keeping the majority race from speaking out.
logic & common sense are beyond the capabilities of most marxists... especially those that have tasted the type of control jac's has since covid broke...
she won't give up the gagging bill, all under the guise of the mosque attacks... she needs it to provide an additional layer of cancel culture to those opposing her divisive & separatist agenda...
Excellent summary. Thank-you Chris.
You provide one of the best paragraphs I have read any where, when you write:-
Trans on TERFs etc etc etc. Juries will be asked to solve problems philosophers have struggled with for centuries.
Oh how lucky we are to have 'Cindy & friends ready to prove how inadequate those philosophers were. chuckle chuckle.
Thanks Chris, goodo. I look forward to seeing the enforcement of hate speech law against mainstream religious people whose holy book/s strongly promote hate.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.