Trying to bury carbon dioxide deep underground is another fashionable green fantasy. It consumes big dollars for taxpayer subsidies but coal and gas producers will love it as it wastes energy and will increase demand for reliable energy. Artificial carbon capture is an unnecessary waste - the grasslands, forests, crops and continental shelf of Australia sequester far more carbon dioxide than Australia emits from all energy, transport, agriculture and mining sources.
Australia has 440 million hectares of grasslands – that 4.4 M sq km is larger than Europe’s total area of 3.5 M sq km. We also have 147 million hectares of native forests, 1.8 million hectares of plantations and 4% of the world’s global forest estate. Australia has the world’s sixth largest forest area and the fourth-largest area of forest in nature conservation reserves. We are not short of trees.
Australian forests absorb 940 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually, over
double our domestic and industrial emissions of 417 million tonnes per annum.
Add to that the absorption of CO2 into our massive area of grasslands, crops,
soils and continental shelf waters and Australia does more than its fair share
of CO2 sequestration (which means our grasslands and forests are starving for
more CO2).
Trees, grasses and crops need more carbon dioxide plant food and the slight
increase in global atmospheric carbon dioxide has led to a significant
expansion of forests, grasslands and crops and reduction of the world’s
deserts.
All vegetation needs solar energy, carbon dioxide, rain and soil to grow. Green
apologists claim that harvesting trees for wood-fired power stations is a net
zero process because burning wood recycles CO2 into the atmosphere. But they
forget the energy needed and emissions created in logging, chipping, transport
and replanting forests.
Burning coal or grazing cattle are both net–zero on different time scales.
Grass extracts CO2 from the atmosphere. Cattle and sheep convert grass into
wool, leather, energy, protein, fat, bone and milk for human use - all part of
the natural global food chain. Some of the carbon compounds consumed by cattle
are quickly returned to the atmosphere in burps and farts. Some of the carbon
in milk and meat is recycled quickly via human emissions, but most is
sequestered into human bodies or in wool and leather products. Burial of human
bodies sequesters more carbon deep underground. The grass-cattle-human chain is
a net zero process that is quicker than the very long net zero process in
waiting for new trees to grow. Adult cattle and sheep produce new offspring
within one year, one after another, and they grow quickly. They are harvested,
milked or shorn far quicker than new trees can grow and be harvested.
Without cattle and graziers, grasslands would be fuel for monstrous bushfires
or fuel for termites and wood-rot – all of which put more carbon dioxide and
methane into the atmosphere. And if grasslands and croplands are smothered in
trees, there will be no food. The Kyoto Agreement land sterilisation is
achieving this foolish outcome.
Real red meat is green - it lives on grasses and sequesters carbon dioxide. The
consumption of meat, milk and cheese cannot change long-term climate. Our teeth
and gut flora have evolved for eating and digesting meat. The war on cattle and
sheep is a ploy by vegan activists using the climate bandwagon trying to force
consumers to live their way of life. In our democracy, we tolerate them with bemused
amusement. In their intolerant world, we are on their hit list.
The main population centres of Australia are in the south-east. Forests,
grasslands and crops in this area fix about 30% of all of Australia’s carbon
dioxide emissions. As always, it is rural Australia that supplies the
population centres with food, minerals and energy. But farmers bear the brunt
of unworkable carbon “farming” schemes and miners face silly carbon-capture
schemes all devised by green-smoothie shiny-bums in tax-funded ivory towers.
Rural and regional Australia should be rewarded, not punished, for productively absorbing giga-tonnes of carbon dioxide.
Reference:
Supporting data for the
above article can be found in Professor Ian Plimer’s latest book “Green
Murder”(www.greenmurder.com) which will be released by Connor Court Publishing in late
November. Pre-publication orders are discounted and signed.
Stop Burning Trees:
https://mailchi.mp/245c546fabef/stop-burning-trees-go-for-nuclear-and-gas-to-go-green-184894?e=b4fa0c6183
Viv
Forbes is a geologist and economic analyst, who farms in Australia.
1 comment:
Logical reasoning.
My idea would be to take away the money.
Stop giving money to the blackmailing UNCCC. No money=no UNCCC=no problem.
Anyone who will pay billions of dollars of taxpayer’s money and commit to reducing carbon emission by 50% thereby restricting production and therefore the ability to create income, on a non-existent problem, must be wrong in the head.
But;
“To argue with those who have renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”
Thomas Paine
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.