“…the findings raise concerns
regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and
underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and
myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young
individuals.”
In New Zealand an article
in Stuff reports a rise in cardiac events and a reduced survival rate in
2020/2021:
“Fewer New Zealanders are surviving cardiac arrests that occur outside of hospital, with survival rates down for the second consecutive year – a fact experts believe is linked to disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.”
The NZ government is not
releasing current data concerning hospital admissions for cardiac problems. In
contrast the Israeli study concludes:
“Surveillance of potential
vaccine side-effects and COVID-19 outcomes should incorporate emergency call
out and other health data to identify public health trends and promptly
investigate potential underlying causes.”
The New Zealand government is
still maintaining that mRNA vaccination reduces the risk of hospitalisation and
death despite its own figures which show that hospitalisation rates among the
boosted are higher than those of the unvaccinated. Moreover a Danish study
in the Lancet reports that mRNA vaccines do not reduce mortality.
In a quick round up, we can
report that all cause mortality has risen in a wide range of countries
coinciding with vaccine rollouts. Rises have been reported in Canada, Cyprus,
US, EU, and here in NZ. Hospitals in the UK are reporting large rises in the
volume of cardiac cases. Birmingham NHS up 87% in 2021. Blackpool NHS up 400%
in 2021, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ up 400% in 2021. We have already covered the
rise in insurance claims for death among working age people in the USA and
the high incidence of vaccine injuries in the armed forces.
The point I wish to make is
that the New Zealand government is aboard the Titanic rearranging the
deckchairs, apparently regarding multiple reports of vaccine injury and death as
normal. The general public has been kept in the dark.
In an April 12th Ministry of
Health release Dr Ashley Bloomfield said
“COVID-19 has highlighted that
making evidence based health decisions is good for the country’s wellbeing and
economy.”
Which evidence is Dr.
Bloomfield using?
Today I received a message from
a friend. A 17 year old relative collapsed at the roadside with heart pains.
The response of her parents to a suggestion that it could be vaccine related: “you
must be joking”. This is where government information has left the public.
The risks are real but the information is not.
This makes me terribly sad,
because it goes against the duty of care that our government and medical system
owes the public. Young people are at risk of cardiac events following
vaccination, but the risks are largely absent from the vaccine promotional
advertising.
Who writes the advertising copy
and who approves it? The Brothers Grimm? This is not a casual matter of minor
misrepresentation, this is unconscionable.
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a
senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification
company (now known as FoodChain ID)
3 comments:
In my limited experience, most attempts to enlighten my friends and family about these risks are dismissed as coming from an ant-vaxer. The advertising and propaganda has been very effective, such that even highly intelligent folk simply shut their minds to the awful prospect that the government might be wrong
The successful marketing of an experimental injection is just another example of how successful the propaganda machine can be, if constantly promoted as fact, using a bottomless bucket of money to bombard a gullible population with constant save your whanau advertising. From very early observations, it was obvious that no more than 3-months partial protection could be expected from the jab. Many prominent scientists & chemists, some involved in developing the injection, have been dismissed & stripped of their well earned titles, just for pointing out the shortfalls, & indeed the dangers of this experimental drug. What is the agenda of the governments promoting this injection as the only answer, when recommended treatments were immediately removed from availability.
Yes, as much chance as convincing the average person Putin is not insane and that war is an American creation..
or finding someone to believe the IPCC and the millions of people behind global warming ARE actually wrong and CO2 is not warming the globe.
State propaganda has been refined to an art form these days, nothing issued from Govt is as it seems.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.