Early in July legislation to create a new public media entity was introduced into Parliament by the recently-appointed Minister of Broadcasting and Media, Willie Jackson.
It is the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill.
If the bill passes, the Government’s new public media entity will replace RNZ and TVNZ next year. It will become an Autonomous Crown Entity.
The Government’s already committed $327 million to part-fund it.
That $327 million has been allocated to this merger, seems it’s just another case of the Government playing fast and loose with our, the taxpayers’ money, to further particular political aims.
It’s also concerning when Cabinet papers show the entity “would not be expected to maximise its commercial revenue”. What the hell does that mean?
Come on Willie. Does that mean our nation’s biggest media entity could be dependent on Government bailouts?
Maybe such a scenario merely allows greater control by government?
At a time when all New Zealanders are struggling with a cost of living crisis, how can we afford for the Government to be spending up on what a number of media commentators are labelling “a poorly defined merger”?
More importantly, how can we afford to allow this Government so much control over what we see and hear?
So why are they doing this?
Well, for a starter it seems like more control being exerted by the Maori caucus because a Cabinet paper in 2020 stated the existing RNZ and TVNZ legislation “does not place sufficient emphasis on the Crown’s obligations to Maori”.
The Crown’s obligation to Maori? Obligations? Geez, they have a separate Maori television service set up for them and they have iwi radio, reo irirangi, that comprises 21 iwi radio stations around the country.
The cabinet paper called for legislation to set out the new entity’s “critical role in promoting Maori interests, matauranga Maori and Maori culture, and protecting te reo Maori as a taonga”.
News and information is required to be reliable and accurate, comprehensive, impartial and balanced, while the organisation must also reflect New Zealand’s history, and ensure Maori can access content by and about themselves.
Jackson told Parliament he was excited to introduce the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill. “The creation of this new entity will strengthen the delivery of public media services for future generations.
“The rise of online misinformation was another reason to boost public media to provide reliable accurate news.”
“I have always believed in the type of model that we’re envisaging,” states Willie Jackson.
I bet you do Willie. I’m starting to form a clear picture in my mind what this super media entity will be doing.
“Do you really think that the Government will be managing interviews or trying to change stuff? We shouldn’t worry about that. There will be no editorial stranglehold,” Jackson crowed.
Well, hang on a minute there Willie. Your Government has proven itself to be very, very adept at manipulating the mainstream media and what stories get printed and what don’t!
“It’s nonsense about us wanting to direct and manage everything,” Jackson complained.
That sounds awfully like a Tui advert to me Willie!
Do I sense a hidden agenda here?
National’s broadcasting and media spokesperson, Melissa Lee said the Public Interest Journalism Fund to which the government contributed $55m into various media outlets – had created “a perception that the Government was giving media a kind of a bribe”.
“Media should not be trusted because they were literally being a mouthpiece for the Government,” she said.
Lee also expressed concern in parliament where she claimed setting up Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media as an Autonomous Crown Entity made it vulnerable to ministerial influence and direction.
Too true Melissa, because research shows less than half the New Zealand public now have ‘overall trust’ in news media outlets.
Are we surprised? NOT IN THE LEAST!
Judith Collins also shares Melissa Lee’s concerns regarding the public funding, control and autonomy of Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media. Collins told parliament recently that mainstream media outlets themselves were responsible for a slump in public trust in news. She said social media platforms were actually providing much-needed alternative views.
Media analyst Gavin Ellis shared similar concerns, noting Autonomous Crown Entities “must have regard to government policy when directed by the Minister responsible”.
Ok, so we now have our largest media entity able to be directed or influenced by the broadcasting minister???
Yep, I see where you are heading with this now Willie.
Gavin Ellis further said, “Why was the new entity not designated an Independent Crown Entity which is generally independent of government policy?”
Well, I think we all know the answer to that, don’t we?
Because the minister of broadcasting is not able to exert influence over an Independent Crown Entity like they could with Autonomous Crown Entity. An Autonomous Crown Entity is more vulnerable to ministerial influence and direction.
I see what you have done there Willie; A very cunning stunt!
The new Bill states that the new entity must be governed by a board that has skills and experience relating to financial management and te ao Maori and tikanga Maori.
Are broadcasting skills immaterial? Looks like it.
Minister Jackson stated, that with the exception of the chief executives, all staff will transfer to the new agency on the same terms and conditions.
So, given the chief executives are gone and Willie says “ I think you’ll need the right leadership and a cultural change to ensure success.”
No prizes for guessing the makeup of the board and senior management.
Just more co-governance by stealth!!!
It’s also concerning when Cabinet papers show the entity “would not be expected to maximise its commercial revenue”. What the hell does that mean?
Come on Willie. Does that mean our nation’s biggest media entity could be dependent on Government bailouts?
Maybe such a scenario merely allows greater control by government?
At a time when all New Zealanders are struggling with a cost of living crisis, how can we afford for the Government to be spending up on what a number of media commentators are labelling “a poorly defined merger”?
More importantly, how can we afford to allow this Government so much control over what we see and hear?
So why are they doing this?
Well, for a starter it seems like more control being exerted by the Maori caucus because a Cabinet paper in 2020 stated the existing RNZ and TVNZ legislation “does not place sufficient emphasis on the Crown’s obligations to Maori”.
The Crown’s obligation to Maori? Obligations? Geez, they have a separate Maori television service set up for them and they have iwi radio, reo irirangi, that comprises 21 iwi radio stations around the country.
The cabinet paper called for legislation to set out the new entity’s “critical role in promoting Maori interests, matauranga Maori and Maori culture, and protecting te reo Maori as a taonga”.
News and information is required to be reliable and accurate, comprehensive, impartial and balanced, while the organisation must also reflect New Zealand’s history, and ensure Maori can access content by and about themselves.
Jackson told Parliament he was excited to introduce the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill. “The creation of this new entity will strengthen the delivery of public media services for future generations.
“The rise of online misinformation was another reason to boost public media to provide reliable accurate news.”
“I have always believed in the type of model that we’re envisaging,” states Willie Jackson.
I bet you do Willie. I’m starting to form a clear picture in my mind what this super media entity will be doing.
“Do you really think that the Government will be managing interviews or trying to change stuff? We shouldn’t worry about that. There will be no editorial stranglehold,” Jackson crowed.
Well, hang on a minute there Willie. Your Government has proven itself to be very, very adept at manipulating the mainstream media and what stories get printed and what don’t!
“It’s nonsense about us wanting to direct and manage everything,” Jackson complained.
That sounds awfully like a Tui advert to me Willie!
Do I sense a hidden agenda here?
National’s broadcasting and media spokesperson, Melissa Lee said the Public Interest Journalism Fund to which the government contributed $55m into various media outlets – had created “a perception that the Government was giving media a kind of a bribe”.
“Media should not be trusted because they were literally being a mouthpiece for the Government,” she said.
Lee also expressed concern in parliament where she claimed setting up Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media as an Autonomous Crown Entity made it vulnerable to ministerial influence and direction.
Too true Melissa, because research shows less than half the New Zealand public now have ‘overall trust’ in news media outlets.
Are we surprised? NOT IN THE LEAST!
Judith Collins also shares Melissa Lee’s concerns regarding the public funding, control and autonomy of Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media. Collins told parliament recently that mainstream media outlets themselves were responsible for a slump in public trust in news. She said social media platforms were actually providing much-needed alternative views.
Media analyst Gavin Ellis shared similar concerns, noting Autonomous Crown Entities “must have regard to government policy when directed by the Minister responsible”.
Ok, so we now have our largest media entity able to be directed or influenced by the broadcasting minister???
Yep, I see where you are heading with this now Willie.
Gavin Ellis further said, “Why was the new entity not designated an Independent Crown Entity which is generally independent of government policy?”
Well, I think we all know the answer to that, don’t we?
Because the minister of broadcasting is not able to exert influence over an Independent Crown Entity like they could with Autonomous Crown Entity. An Autonomous Crown Entity is more vulnerable to ministerial influence and direction.
I see what you have done there Willie; A very cunning stunt!
The new Bill states that the new entity must be governed by a board that has skills and experience relating to financial management and te ao Maori and tikanga Maori.
Are broadcasting skills immaterial? Looks like it.
Minister Jackson stated, that with the exception of the chief executives, all staff will transfer to the new agency on the same terms and conditions.
So, given the chief executives are gone and Willie says “ I think you’ll need the right leadership and a cultural change to ensure success.”
No prizes for guessing the makeup of the board and senior management.
Just more co-governance by stealth!!!
John Porter is a citizen, deeply concerned about the loss of democracy and the insidious promotion of separatism by our current government. This article was first published HERE
4 comments:
I completely agree with every word you write John. Thank you for a very useful
synopsis. The frightening fact is that even before Willie gets his hands on the national broadcaster, we do not get the truth from it. How much worse can it be? Well it can of course. We who get all our news from very effective blogs will cease to listen to RNZ at all, instead of just the odd favourite. Additionally terrifying of course is that there is little (NO) hope on the horizon from National. They are just craven and helpless - I cannot think of any of them who will speak out - Judith Collins? We must pin our hopes on the efforts of the Taxpayers Union who have shown courage and expedition in challenging the law. I am so hoping for their success ( I'm sure money will help).
RNZ now includes extensive maori twaddle and interviews of endless activists by maori/pro maori interviewers. Outlandish statements pass unchallenged, are often led, and all soothingly supported. And all this despite the RNZ Charter not providing for especial maori emphasis (although the inevitable recommendation from the recent Inquiry is that this remarkable oversight be corrected). If the channel attempts to be all things to all groups and maturities, youth , ethnics, but primarily maori , then a service which has for decades been a source of information and solace for hundreds of thousands will be destroyed. Already many long term listeners have abandoned. Curiously, in RNZ interview 3 Jul Jackson stated that of his many maori associates, none listen extensively to RNZ, despite the ever pandering pro maori content.
It seems the PIJF is working. How many others have had my experience? Down the years I have contributed dozens of letters to various media trying to see things in a less biassed fashion than accepted narrow versions. Now that source of interest has dried up since nothing of mine has reached print since the Maorification process has reached full swing. I look in vain for comment on seriously threatening and undemocratic legislation but all I see is outrageous and nonsensical support for the current con being visited on us via the "Mushroom Syndrome" It is obvious the whole process of Maorification is censored from public comment. Many of us appear to have been "blacklisted" by the public press while astute observers (e.g.Amy Brooke) can only be found in overseas publications. No longer is New Zealand free of bribery and corruption.
Excellent article, John.
Like many Kiwis I am appalled at the egregious destruction of our democracy being replaced by a racist, apartheid system. History shows vividly that such a race based dictatorship can only end in conflict, possibly revolution and violence.
Additionally, I will not use Maori words at all from now on, and I will not accept their useage in media communications, etc.
This is a new stance for me, as I have hitherto been quite accepting of the use of Maori names and phrases etc, where appropriate.
BUT the huge avalanche of Maori words and phrases, often with no English interpretation, in main stream media, place names, government departmental names etc, being forced upon the populace has had the effect of aversion therapy on me.
To illustrate:- I like and enjoy raw chopped red onion in it’s appropriate setting, which is in a green salad normally as part of the main meal of the day.
However, if I was forced to eat raw red onion all the time, every meal, every course, I would quickly come to hate raw red onion and try and avoid it at all costs, and I would deeply resent being made to eat it.
It has now become the same with Maori language.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.