Tomorrow it will be five years since Ardern was sworn in as Prime Minister. At that time she was incredibly popular, and her support kept rising, hitting its heights in 2020.
That tide has certainly turned in recent months, and there are signs that Ardern is headed for a very difficult time as Prime Minister in the near future. Economic and social factors may get much worse. And the prospect of Labour’s popularity declining further is possible, especially as difficult reforms throw up problems. Re-election in 2023 has never seemed more in doubt.
Unsurprisingly, there has been an upswing in speculation about how long Ardern will stay on as leader and prime minister. The idea of her stepping down before the next election is gaining traction, despite there being no obvious candidate in the Labour Party who could do a better job than her.
Labour’s difficult decline
Labour’s post-2020 decline has been due to a number of factors that have made governing difficult. Covid, in particular, shifted from a winning issue, to one throwing up problem after problem that the Government has been blamed for. Then the state of the economy is proving highly damaging, with the cost of living being particularly difficult to navigate. Other Labour policies, from Three Waters to Co-governance, have irritated many who gave Ardern’s party the tick in 2020.
Unfortunately for Ardern and Labour, much of this is likely to get worse over the next year. Part of this is simply a “Covid hangover”, with the consequences of many of the Government’s actions during this time, as well as the Reserve Bank’s money printing, now having a detrimental impact.
Socially and economically, there are some severe outcomes that are building up steam. Law and order is growing as a problem, with some analysis suggesting that this is arising out of some of the social and economic dislocation caused by the pandemic and the lockdowns.
The Government also has a work programme that is turning out to be highly contentious. Big reforms in water, health and education are not working out as smoothly as the government might have envisaged.
Ardern’s own cheerleaders are becoming disillusioned
Ardern will always have her critics. For example, no one will have been surprised that the business community have become deeply disillusioned in Ardern. The latest Herald Mood of the Boardroom survey ranked Ardern as only the 12th best performer in Cabinet. Rating her out of five, the CEOs gave her 2.3. This was down from nearly 4/5 in 2020 – the business community were previously very supportive of her leadership, especially during the Covid period.
However, most crucially, support on the political left for Ardern has also been on the decline. Progressive sectors of society that were highly enthusiastic about Ardern’s leadership early on, seem to have lost faith that she will fulfill her promises about child poverty or climate change.
The narrative of non-delivery hurts Labour and Ardern. Those who might normally tend to be supporters have had to face up to the fact that the Government is very good at talking, but less effective at delivering what has been promised.
Even commentators who might have been relied upon by the Beehive to put forward a positive analysis of Ardern have become much less positive. For example, recently Morgan Godfery wrote about Ardern’s failure of to stick to the policies she believes in or even to state what she believes in. He paints a picture of a poll-driven government without a plan.
He’s also spoken about how Ardern is “missing in action” on the core issues that her voters care about, and fails to translate rhetoric into action. He says supporters are frustrated by the lack of change from a Government that promised “transformation”.
Similarly, Shane Te Pou has criticised his government saying: “Jacinda Ardern’s clear, empathetic communication and crisis leadership has been replaced by government announcements drowning in bureaucratese. Ministers seem to be led by agency work programmes, turning the cogs rather than working to a cohesive vision.”
The sort of policies and progress that might have enthused and mobilised Labour’s own natural support base simply haven’t happened. The failure to make advances on economic inequality, housing – remember Kiwibuild, or the state housing wait list – together with slow or ineffective progress on climate change, means that those on the political left are sometimes the biggest critics of Ardern.
Could Ardern step down in the next six months?
On an election night broadcast in 2020 when Ardern won her historic 50 per cent vote on the back of Labour’s successful Covid response that year, I predicted that Ardern wouldn’t see out the whole term as prime minister. She had already been through so much as leader of the country and, like John Key, would want to go out on a high note rather than lose an election.
Ardern has already missed her chance to leave office with her popularity at a high. Labour’s polling has dropped dramatically from that extraordinary 50 per cent, and is now around the low-to-mid 30s in many polls. Ardern’s own popularity as PM is still relatively high, and way ahead of any other candidate, but it has dipped considerably.
Nonetheless, it might still suit Ardern to get out of politics before things get even worse. For this reason, broadcaster Rachel Smalley has recently written in the NBR that it’s only a matter of time before Ardern steps down.
Smalley argues that Ardern only has two likely outcomes at the next election, neither of which will be attractive to her. The first is that she suffers a defeat, which will further tarnish her reputation. It would therefore be better to go out on her own terms: “She will be an undefeated Prime Minister and the first to achieve a single-party majority government in New Zealand. Her legacy will be tied to two events of significant historical importance: her compassionate, unifying response to the March 15 Christchurch Mosque Attacks and her decision to lockdown the country in March 2020. Those two events, one year apart, showcased Ardern at her best.”
The second likely outcome if Ardern sticks around, is that she will be re-elected but only with difficult coalition partners to manage: “At best, Labour will win but lose its status as a single-party majority government. For three years, Ardern has governed without fear or favour, unchecked by a coalition partner. She will have little appetite to enter a tumultuous third term where she will be held to account by her likely coalition partners – the Greens, Te Pāti Maori or, God forbid, New Zealand First.”
Even under a scenario whereby Ardern’s coalition management of these disparate forces is smooth, the economic and social conditions will be highly challenging for her: “All of the economic and social fallout from Covid will start peaking” and “Jacinda Ardern is not the Prime Minister to lead New Zealand’s fiscal and economic recovery from 2023 to 2026. She knows that. We know that. So I reckon she’ll jump.”
Smalley believes that Ardern’s resignation will be announced before Christmas. And she also points to the recent rule change in the Labour Party which means that a caucus vote of two-thirds in favour can quickly install a new leader without having to go through the expanded party membership and trade union vote. Therefore, Ardern’s trusted close friend Grant Robertson could be put into the top seat immediately. If it is to occur, such a transition would certainly be best to take place well before the next election.
The likelihood of such a big change has divided political commentators. The Herald’s political editor Claire Trevett responded to speculation about Ardern a few days ago, writing that: “as things stand she remains Labour’s best chance in 2023 and is still more popular and trusted than any other leader. I’d be very surprised if she cut and run while that is the case. She and Grant Robertson will be critical.”
But Trevett confirms that the rumours of Ardern stepping down soon are now frequently being put to journalists and the PM.
Trevett has also argued that Ardern can’t afford to leave Labour in the lurch during a time of instability: “At a time of economic and social uncertainty, the worst thing for Labour would be to add political uncertainty onto that bonfire by rushing to the polls or switching leaders.”
The Labour Party annual conference takes place next month, and will be a chance for Ardern and her colleagues to show that the party has some new ideas and momentum. There are so many problems building up steam at the moment, and yet Labour and Ardern look like they have run out of steam and ideas themselves. When this happens, it’s normally a good idea to consider the political exit door earlier than waiting to be pushed out.
Labour’s difficult decline
Labour’s post-2020 decline has been due to a number of factors that have made governing difficult. Covid, in particular, shifted from a winning issue, to one throwing up problem after problem that the Government has been blamed for. Then the state of the economy is proving highly damaging, with the cost of living being particularly difficult to navigate. Other Labour policies, from Three Waters to Co-governance, have irritated many who gave Ardern’s party the tick in 2020.
Unfortunately for Ardern and Labour, much of this is likely to get worse over the next year. Part of this is simply a “Covid hangover”, with the consequences of many of the Government’s actions during this time, as well as the Reserve Bank’s money printing, now having a detrimental impact.
Socially and economically, there are some severe outcomes that are building up steam. Law and order is growing as a problem, with some analysis suggesting that this is arising out of some of the social and economic dislocation caused by the pandemic and the lockdowns.
The Government also has a work programme that is turning out to be highly contentious. Big reforms in water, health and education are not working out as smoothly as the government might have envisaged.
Ardern’s own cheerleaders are becoming disillusioned
Ardern will always have her critics. For example, no one will have been surprised that the business community have become deeply disillusioned in Ardern. The latest Herald Mood of the Boardroom survey ranked Ardern as only the 12th best performer in Cabinet. Rating her out of five, the CEOs gave her 2.3. This was down from nearly 4/5 in 2020 – the business community were previously very supportive of her leadership, especially during the Covid period.
However, most crucially, support on the political left for Ardern has also been on the decline. Progressive sectors of society that were highly enthusiastic about Ardern’s leadership early on, seem to have lost faith that she will fulfill her promises about child poverty or climate change.
The narrative of non-delivery hurts Labour and Ardern. Those who might normally tend to be supporters have had to face up to the fact that the Government is very good at talking, but less effective at delivering what has been promised.
Even commentators who might have been relied upon by the Beehive to put forward a positive analysis of Ardern have become much less positive. For example, recently Morgan Godfery wrote about Ardern’s failure of to stick to the policies she believes in or even to state what she believes in. He paints a picture of a poll-driven government without a plan.
He’s also spoken about how Ardern is “missing in action” on the core issues that her voters care about, and fails to translate rhetoric into action. He says supporters are frustrated by the lack of change from a Government that promised “transformation”.
Similarly, Shane Te Pou has criticised his government saying: “Jacinda Ardern’s clear, empathetic communication and crisis leadership has been replaced by government announcements drowning in bureaucratese. Ministers seem to be led by agency work programmes, turning the cogs rather than working to a cohesive vision.”
The sort of policies and progress that might have enthused and mobilised Labour’s own natural support base simply haven’t happened. The failure to make advances on economic inequality, housing – remember Kiwibuild, or the state housing wait list – together with slow or ineffective progress on climate change, means that those on the political left are sometimes the biggest critics of Ardern.
Could Ardern step down in the next six months?
On an election night broadcast in 2020 when Ardern won her historic 50 per cent vote on the back of Labour’s successful Covid response that year, I predicted that Ardern wouldn’t see out the whole term as prime minister. She had already been through so much as leader of the country and, like John Key, would want to go out on a high note rather than lose an election.
Ardern has already missed her chance to leave office with her popularity at a high. Labour’s polling has dropped dramatically from that extraordinary 50 per cent, and is now around the low-to-mid 30s in many polls. Ardern’s own popularity as PM is still relatively high, and way ahead of any other candidate, but it has dipped considerably.
Nonetheless, it might still suit Ardern to get out of politics before things get even worse. For this reason, broadcaster Rachel Smalley has recently written in the NBR that it’s only a matter of time before Ardern steps down.
Smalley argues that Ardern only has two likely outcomes at the next election, neither of which will be attractive to her. The first is that she suffers a defeat, which will further tarnish her reputation. It would therefore be better to go out on her own terms: “She will be an undefeated Prime Minister and the first to achieve a single-party majority government in New Zealand. Her legacy will be tied to two events of significant historical importance: her compassionate, unifying response to the March 15 Christchurch Mosque Attacks and her decision to lockdown the country in March 2020. Those two events, one year apart, showcased Ardern at her best.”
The second likely outcome if Ardern sticks around, is that she will be re-elected but only with difficult coalition partners to manage: “At best, Labour will win but lose its status as a single-party majority government. For three years, Ardern has governed without fear or favour, unchecked by a coalition partner. She will have little appetite to enter a tumultuous third term where she will be held to account by her likely coalition partners – the Greens, Te Pāti Maori or, God forbid, New Zealand First.”
Even under a scenario whereby Ardern’s coalition management of these disparate forces is smooth, the economic and social conditions will be highly challenging for her: “All of the economic and social fallout from Covid will start peaking” and “Jacinda Ardern is not the Prime Minister to lead New Zealand’s fiscal and economic recovery from 2023 to 2026. She knows that. We know that. So I reckon she’ll jump.”
Smalley believes that Ardern’s resignation will be announced before Christmas. And she also points to the recent rule change in the Labour Party which means that a caucus vote of two-thirds in favour can quickly install a new leader without having to go through the expanded party membership and trade union vote. Therefore, Ardern’s trusted close friend Grant Robertson could be put into the top seat immediately. If it is to occur, such a transition would certainly be best to take place well before the next election.
The likelihood of such a big change has divided political commentators. The Herald’s political editor Claire Trevett responded to speculation about Ardern a few days ago, writing that: “as things stand she remains Labour’s best chance in 2023 and is still more popular and trusted than any other leader. I’d be very surprised if she cut and run while that is the case. She and Grant Robertson will be critical.”
But Trevett confirms that the rumours of Ardern stepping down soon are now frequently being put to journalists and the PM.
Trevett has also argued that Ardern can’t afford to leave Labour in the lurch during a time of instability: “At a time of economic and social uncertainty, the worst thing for Labour would be to add political uncertainty onto that bonfire by rushing to the polls or switching leaders.”
The Labour Party annual conference takes place next month, and will be a chance for Ardern and her colleagues to show that the party has some new ideas and momentum. There are so many problems building up steam at the moment, and yet Labour and Ardern look like they have run out of steam and ideas themselves. When this happens, it’s normally a good idea to consider the political exit door earlier than waiting to be pushed out.
Dr Bryce Edwards is a politics lecturer at Victoria University and director of Critical Politics, a project focused on researching New Zealand politics and society. This article was first published HERE
8 comments:
I’d like to congratulate Rishi Sunak on becoming UK Prime Minister. The first person of Indian descent in the role. Importantly, he achieved this:
- without calling people racists if they do not agree with his ideas
- without a system of giving Indian votes greater weight than all others in the UK
- without legislation making Indians the superior race in the UK
- without Hindi becoming the first language of the UK
- without a Ministry of Indian Development in the UK
- without a gravy train of billions of dollars of public money going to him and other UK Indians
- without claiming that Indians have special abilities (unspecified) that other races do not have
He achieved the position on merit. He has my respect.
Other Indians in the UK, also do very well like Rishi. Perhaps this is because they did not get to the UK before all other nationalities so they don’t have a false sense of entitlement and they don’t believe they are owed something. They have no claim to special treatment and do not get any. They are not on the wrong end of national statistics on education, health, government benefits, and crime. Just like Indian immigrants in NZ, Indians in the UK have had to work hard and have achieved everything on merit. New Zealand’s first inhabitants should learn from this.
Hearty congratulations Rishi Sunak! What a fantastic role model you are!
Many in NZ could learn from your example.
So Ardern's first great achievement is taking guns off law abiding citizens, who had or would never use them illegally, and setting up a pointless firearms register which the gangs would never be on.
Brilliant! Oh yes, and wearing a moslem scarf while visiting the mosque victims. That was a massive hit with our woke MSM.
Has she prevented future terrorist attacks by her actions? Highly doubtful. Because terrorists are not law-abiding citizens and will always find a way (eg NZ gangs, which have grown both in size and violence under Ardern) to source their weapons from people not on firearms registers.
Secondly, she locked the whole country down, more than once. Did this stop people catching Covid? NO.
She mandated vaccination and victimised those who refused - kind and caring NOT.
Did this prevent the vaccinated from being hospitalised or dying from Covid, despite Ardern assuring them it would not happen? NO.
In fact, official MoH stats show clearly that unvaccinated people fare much better with Covid than vaccinated.
So, what has she done about this statistic? IGNORE IT. Instead she relentlessly pushes a vaccine which was barely effective at best, has caused far more serious side-effects, and actually gives you less protection from the virus than not having it.
What an achievement.
Any other "successes" she can crow about? Nope!
Best she leave ASAP.
A fair commentary of the Ardern administration but unfortunately doesn’t include the one factor that has, more than anything else in the past, led to her personal popularity and success at the polls.
I refer to her deceitful treatment of the voting public.
Like at the last election in the US where vital information contained in the Hunter Biden laptop was deliberately withheld from the voters, it is anybody’s guess what the outcome of our last general election here in New Zealand might have been had Ardern published the clandestine He Puapua report beforehand.
My guess is that both she and Biden would have been shown the door.
Another thing that may determine the timing of her exit is her need for the public adulation which she must know is now based on a lie.
If she does go before the election it will be because, unlike her more capable predecessor Helen Clark, she won’t be able to handle the rejection that comes to those who have overstayed their welcome. Her downfall will be all of her own making and it will not be pretty.
Who woild employ her though? Maybe she get work in china or north korea. I don't think the UN are that desperate. Or maybe she could find dj work but she's getting quite old.
I do wish that Ardern would leave - but she is not wholly responsible for the failures of her party - they are all responsible (irresponsible) and the fear is that Labour might get in again because voters think the party has been purged of its 'poison'. No way at all.
Secondly, I am not enraptured with the alternative people think will get Ardern out of our hair. She was appalling at the UN talking about curtailing freedom of expression. I don't think much of the UN any more - it was never perfect while the big powers kept the veto, but it's even less so now it is in the grip of a whole lot of minor powers with appalling political situations of their own. I just hope there is no place, politically, for the woke and the deluded - sigh.
Pregnancy on the way? That would be an out
A pregnancy might be pushing it, especially while campaigning, but a wedding would also help on the publicity front. But whatevs, she's on the outer and the decay is only going to get worse as more wake up to what's going on. The UN or WEF will be beckoning. One assumes that they'll realise she'll be desperate to make the move. Hopefully they won't be too tough, so it'll be a case of welcome riddance for us.
"Her legacy will be tied to two events of significant historical importance: her compassionate, unifying response to the March 15 Christchurch Mosque Attacks and her decision to lockdown the country in March 2020. Those two events, one year apart, showcased Ardern at her best.”
Well - if those were her best it demonstrates what a disaster this fush'n'chup shop hand has been as PM and she should go back to her day job - if they'll have her!
The first of those events simply displayed her talent for creating photo-ops out of a tragedy. The second was a grossly exaggerated reaction to the pandemic and her measures have damaged the NZ economy in a manner which will take decades to recover from.
Her so-called climate change policies will achieve precisely nothing and complete the financial ruin of New Zealand.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.