According to the woman, her hapless husband erroneously believed the vaccine was experimental since no long term studies had been completed. He asserted that it did not provide immunity from infection or prevent transmission. He also warned of adverse effects which might result in death.
The woman professed to love her husband dearly and mentioned his high IQ, but referred to him as a ‘freedumb fighter’ whose stance on mRNA vaccine safety amounted to ‘domestic abuse’.
The article drew on the expertise of Kim Cullen, who I found has a master’s degree (not a doctorate) in organisational psychology (not a clinical qualification). She described a range of possible sources for the husband’s opinions, including a personality disorder, feelings of vulnerability and isolation, pride and superiority, asserting control, the internet, and, crucially the need to cling to unfounded false beliefs to avoid embarrassment.
At this point in the pandemic, I think you must be aware that mRNA does not stop Covid transmission, infection, or indeed reinfection, so you may be harbouring secret feelings of sympathy for some of these views. You might also be wondering if it is the NZ Herald editorial staff who are “clinging to unfounded false beliefs to avoid embarrassment”. Why on earth did the Herald print this appalling article?
Association Between Pfizer mRNA Vaccination and Both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury
A few days ago, Ministry of Health researchers secured publication of their preprint paper in the Lancet “Adverse Events Following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNtech) in Aotearoa New Zealand”. The paper reveals there is a statistically significant association between Pfizer mRNA vaccination and both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Here in little New Zealand, you wouldn’t know AKI was a potential side effect of mRNA vaccination. The Herald has not covered it. Instead, choosing to print the dreadful tripe above.
Many Kiwi’s are no longer able to follow the Herald uncritically because it doesn’t fit with reality on the ground. We are living in a country with an unprecedented high rate of excess all-cause mortality and an overwhelmed health service. I now have four vaccinated friends who have developed debilitating kidney disease since the shot, but if you want to read more about the NZ study, you will need to read about it in the British press.
The Ministry of Health study only looked at mRNA vaccine outcomes for 21 days after the shot, validating the husband’s point—the long term outcomes remain unassessed. Or are they really unknown? Read this substack article assessing the evidence for longer term serious myocarditis outcomes following mRNA vaccination.
Nor are long term outcomes unknown to the relatives of those adversely affected by mRNA vaccines (there are tens of thousands affected in New Zealand), but they would be unknown to those relying exclusively upon the NZ Herald. They would naturally still believe against all up-to-date published evidence that the vaccine is protecting them from serious illness and death (it isn’t).
The New Zealand Ministry of Health Has Started to Come Clean, but MSN Hasn’t
So the New Zealand Ministry of Health has started to come clean, but MSM hasn’t. Why? We don’t really know. We are left with speculation. Do sources of advertising revenue come with conditions attached? Does the media have signed agreements with the government that preclude coverage that might lead to vaccine hesitancy, possibly conditions of generous government subsidies?
If that is the case, it is undermining our Kiwi culture, which is one of trust. For a long time, there has been an assumption of honesty. In 2021 New Zealand retained the top ranking as the world’s least corrupt nation. The Hon. Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, commented:
At that time in January 2022, Faafoi thought the government pandemic response would send New Zealand into the stratosphere of anti-corruption scores, but by mid year, much like Ardern, he decided to exit parliament to “spend more time with his family” and by some lucky chance almost immediately landed a job as head of a lobbying and PR firm.
Our Culture of Transparency Has Been Eroded During the Pandemic
The government used the historical record of Kiwi trust as a cover for their absolute rejection of concerns about mRNA vaccine safety. As it has turned out, transparency would have served us well. Instead, we have been subjected to a ‘safe and effective’ media narrative for two years, paid for through government grants and reinforced with unfounded attacks against counter narratives funded directly by the Prime Minister’s office.
We have learned a lot about society during the pandemic. The glue of public trust is truth and transparency. Without it, we are left with the fog of uncertainty and fear of the unknown. This equates with elevated levels of individual and social stress well known to be associated with negative social outcomes, including crime, low educational achievement, family violence, economic under performance, and high rates of illness.
Despite having the data to do so, the Ministry of Health has not undertaken any investigation to determine if there is any correlation between all cause deaths and vaccine status over the longer term. This simple procedure would settle any controversy. It hasn’t happened. We are being kept in the dark. Requests put to the Minister of Health have been met with deafening silence. Why?
Full Disclosure and Transparency Cannot Be Delayed Any Longer
It may seem to politicians and MSM that there would be a downside to admitting inaccuracies, mistakes, or, dare I say, ‘fault,’ but it will eventually all come out. It already is. The UK has abandoned mRNA vaccination for the under 50s, as have a number of other countries. A growing number of senior UK medical specialists are asking questions about hugely elevated rates of heart disease and rapid onset or recurrence of cancers.
There is now not only no point in postponing a reckoning with the emerging scientific picture of a very wide range of long term adverse effects, but there will be a huge downside if it is delayed any longer. In the weird Herald article, the husband clearly had some valid concerns about mRNA vaccines, while the woman was misinformed by MSM. A carefully curated discussion in the media along with some public debates will put everyone back on an even playing field.
The opportunity to undertake cross examination of government witnesses in high court actions has also been so far missing in action. Curiously the courts have deferred to the government for scientific advice. Since when was scientific verity the sole prerogative of government departments?
It is clear that detailed knowledge of the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines would enable GPs and hospital staff to deal appropriately and sympathetically with injury. It would also enable doctors and medical staff to relay factual informed consent to patients. This has not happened so far.
Transparency would also help to heal some family rifts like the one reported so one-sidedly by the Herald. Under the circumstances, the husband should be exonerated for thinking that truth doesn’t count for much when it comes to modern democracy and mainstream news reporting. How many extra sudden deaths are required before the media grows a conscience and starts asking questions? It is time to level up.
Our new Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins, promises he is going to re-evaluate unpopular Labour policies. Is he also going to re-evaluate misleading ones? We hope so. No point in postponing the inevitable. As Shakespeare said, “The truth will out.”
Dr Guy Hatchard is a former senior manager at Genetic ID, food testing and certification company. This article was first published HERE
The article drew on the expertise of Kim Cullen, who I found has a master’s degree (not a doctorate) in organisational psychology (not a clinical qualification). She described a range of possible sources for the husband’s opinions, including a personality disorder, feelings of vulnerability and isolation, pride and superiority, asserting control, the internet, and, crucially the need to cling to unfounded false beliefs to avoid embarrassment.
At this point in the pandemic, I think you must be aware that mRNA does not stop Covid transmission, infection, or indeed reinfection, so you may be harbouring secret feelings of sympathy for some of these views. You might also be wondering if it is the NZ Herald editorial staff who are “clinging to unfounded false beliefs to avoid embarrassment”. Why on earth did the Herald print this appalling article?
Association Between Pfizer mRNA Vaccination and Both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury
A few days ago, Ministry of Health researchers secured publication of their preprint paper in the Lancet “Adverse Events Following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNtech) in Aotearoa New Zealand”. The paper reveals there is a statistically significant association between Pfizer mRNA vaccination and both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Here in little New Zealand, you wouldn’t know AKI was a potential side effect of mRNA vaccination. The Herald has not covered it. Instead, choosing to print the dreadful tripe above.
Many Kiwi’s are no longer able to follow the Herald uncritically because it doesn’t fit with reality on the ground. We are living in a country with an unprecedented high rate of excess all-cause mortality and an overwhelmed health service. I now have four vaccinated friends who have developed debilitating kidney disease since the shot, but if you want to read more about the NZ study, you will need to read about it in the British press.
The Ministry of Health study only looked at mRNA vaccine outcomes for 21 days after the shot, validating the husband’s point—the long term outcomes remain unassessed. Or are they really unknown? Read this substack article assessing the evidence for longer term serious myocarditis outcomes following mRNA vaccination.
Nor are long term outcomes unknown to the relatives of those adversely affected by mRNA vaccines (there are tens of thousands affected in New Zealand), but they would be unknown to those relying exclusively upon the NZ Herald. They would naturally still believe against all up-to-date published evidence that the vaccine is protecting them from serious illness and death (it isn’t).
The New Zealand Ministry of Health Has Started to Come Clean, but MSN Hasn’t
So the New Zealand Ministry of Health has started to come clean, but MSM hasn’t. Why? We don’t really know. We are left with speculation. Do sources of advertising revenue come with conditions attached? Does the media have signed agreements with the government that preclude coverage that might lead to vaccine hesitancy, possibly conditions of generous government subsidies?
If that is the case, it is undermining our Kiwi culture, which is one of trust. For a long time, there has been an assumption of honesty. In 2021 New Zealand retained the top ranking as the world’s least corrupt nation. The Hon. Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, commented:
“New Zealand has a well-deserved reputation for being relatively free of corruption, with a high level of public trust in government built on a foundation of transparency.”
At that time in January 2022, Faafoi thought the government pandemic response would send New Zealand into the stratosphere of anti-corruption scores, but by mid year, much like Ardern, he decided to exit parliament to “spend more time with his family” and by some lucky chance almost immediately landed a job as head of a lobbying and PR firm.
Our Culture of Transparency Has Been Eroded During the Pandemic
The government used the historical record of Kiwi trust as a cover for their absolute rejection of concerns about mRNA vaccine safety. As it has turned out, transparency would have served us well. Instead, we have been subjected to a ‘safe and effective’ media narrative for two years, paid for through government grants and reinforced with unfounded attacks against counter narratives funded directly by the Prime Minister’s office.
We have learned a lot about society during the pandemic. The glue of public trust is truth and transparency. Without it, we are left with the fog of uncertainty and fear of the unknown. This equates with elevated levels of individual and social stress well known to be associated with negative social outcomes, including crime, low educational achievement, family violence, economic under performance, and high rates of illness.
Despite having the data to do so, the Ministry of Health has not undertaken any investigation to determine if there is any correlation between all cause deaths and vaccine status over the longer term. This simple procedure would settle any controversy. It hasn’t happened. We are being kept in the dark. Requests put to the Minister of Health have been met with deafening silence. Why?
Full Disclosure and Transparency Cannot Be Delayed Any Longer
It may seem to politicians and MSM that there would be a downside to admitting inaccuracies, mistakes, or, dare I say, ‘fault,’ but it will eventually all come out. It already is. The UK has abandoned mRNA vaccination for the under 50s, as have a number of other countries. A growing number of senior UK medical specialists are asking questions about hugely elevated rates of heart disease and rapid onset or recurrence of cancers.
There is now not only no point in postponing a reckoning with the emerging scientific picture of a very wide range of long term adverse effects, but there will be a huge downside if it is delayed any longer. In the weird Herald article, the husband clearly had some valid concerns about mRNA vaccines, while the woman was misinformed by MSM. A carefully curated discussion in the media along with some public debates will put everyone back on an even playing field.
The opportunity to undertake cross examination of government witnesses in high court actions has also been so far missing in action. Curiously the courts have deferred to the government for scientific advice. Since when was scientific verity the sole prerogative of government departments?
It is clear that detailed knowledge of the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines would enable GPs and hospital staff to deal appropriately and sympathetically with injury. It would also enable doctors and medical staff to relay factual informed consent to patients. This has not happened so far.
Transparency would also help to heal some family rifts like the one reported so one-sidedly by the Herald. Under the circumstances, the husband should be exonerated for thinking that truth doesn’t count for much when it comes to modern democracy and mainstream news reporting. How many extra sudden deaths are required before the media grows a conscience and starts asking questions? It is time to level up.
Our new Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins, promises he is going to re-evaluate unpopular Labour policies. Is he also going to re-evaluate misleading ones? We hope so. No point in postponing the inevitable. As Shakespeare said, “The truth will out.”
Dr Guy Hatchard is a former senior manager at Genetic ID, food testing and certification company. This article was first published HERE
5 comments:
Can't imagine Hipkins, who was Covid Minister, allowing the truth to escape. He was DIRECTLY responsible, after all.
Certainly not before the next election.
That would surely scupper any chance he has of winning.
Still, he would almost certainly blame Ashley Bloomfield, who is hopefully getting very nervous about the growing level of concern around mRNA vaccines.
His knighthood may be as shortlived as the beneficial effects of the vaccine itself.
Dr Guy Hatchard has a great talent of getting to the nub of these issues in a very relatable way.
Thank you.
So the New Zealand Ministry of Health has started to come clean, but MSM hasn’t. Why? We don’t really know.
Money certainly has a role to play, and given the massive decline in advertising due the Internet, the recent influx of cash from the PJIF has to be the primary factor in terms of cash.
But I think you're ignoring the overwhelming factor here, which is Left-wing ideology. According to this survey, noted in this post inKiwiblog:
Left of centre 81%
Right of centre 15%
Of the 81% who said they were left of centre, a quarter (or 20% of all journalists) said they were hard or extreme left.
And while ideology should not enter into a discussion about scientific things like vaccines and viruses it did in this case because whatever anti-Covid measure was proposed - lockdowns, masks and ultimately vaccine mandates - those measures demanded overwhelming State control of our lives, which is something fully supported by Left-wing ideology across the board.
Hence the MSM's refusal to back down on this - to date.
I don’t think facts are any part of the NZ ideology any more. Time NZers to live in your own reality, ban the English language ( hated inheritance) and live per the history and science and wisdom of the new education curriculum. Good luck.
If you are looking for a balanced or even thorough presentation of anything, The Herald is not a contender.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.