Societies across the world have long recognised that we all belong to one human race, that we can best live together in harmony when there is a general belief in equality, all belonging in a united county, as one people, equals. That principle has been steadily undermined in New Zealand since 1975, and is now gone: this is a divided nation moving from separation and partnership to co-governance, and towards two unequal race-based parliaments.
Many loud claims for separate rule are based on acceptance
of three selected documents. This was
made clear in a demand made at a 2022
Constitutional Conference at Auckland University for “a constitutional transformation to realise
Maori rights in te Tiriti o Waitangi, He Whakaputanga and the UN
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” The intention is to build a constitution that
will only “realise Maori rights”, denying full citizenship to all others.
Here, te Tiriti o
Waitangi is the reformulated
version of the Treaty of Waitangi which massively contradicts the
original. He Whakaputanga is a
letter written by the English agent in 1835, suggesting the formation of a “Confederation
of the Maori Tribes” that never
existed. The choice before us is
made clear in the third document, the 2007 United Nations Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which presents two starkly different and
contradictory pictures of human rights.
The majority of the document calls for separation by race,
division into “indigenous people” and others with complete rights to the
indigenous group, destroying the rights, belongingness and citizenship of all
others: the complete sovereignty of ‘indigenous’ people. The extensive
list of full rights for indigenous people (here, Maori) includes sovereignty
and control over all aspects of the nation with (for example) “control over
developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources”,
“control over their educational systems and institutions providing education in
their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching
and learning”, “the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their
cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions,
as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures” and
“their own representative institutions.”
To follow those prescriptions is to continue down the road of
division and racism to complete tribal apartheid.
However, the Declaration also reminds us of the founding
principle of the United Nations, that all people are born equal, with a ban on any action which would impair the political
unity of any sovereign state, as well as strong condemnation of the very
division that is demanded within the document.
All doctrines, policies and practices based on or
advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national
origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist,
scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust.
There is no equivocation here. Those two opposing features of the
Declaration demand a choice: either to move into division by origin and race,
or to demand equality as one people.
This is the stark choice facing New Zealand in 2023 – to
continue down the path of racial separation and division to tribal rule, or to
turn back to equality so we can all proudly say ‘we are one people’, that this
is our land, a proud sovereign nation where we all belong.
Dr John Robinson is a research scientist, who has investigated a variety of topics, including the social statistics of Maori. His recognition of fundamental flaws in the interpretation of nineteenth century Maori demographics led him to consider the history of those times in several books.
11 comments:
The leader of the ACT Party David Seymour speaks eloquently at town hall style meetings with common sense about the need to remove all race based legislation from New Zealand . He includes the words "so we can all live harmoniously in New Zealand with DIGNITY. ( my emphasis)
I urge voters to take the time to listen to David Seymour and absorb his message for NZ as the election approaches
So if I read this correctly the UNDRIP advocates for a thing that the UN itself advocates against? How the heck did UNDRIP even come to be passed in the UN? Seems that UNDRIP actually supports racial division but the UN Humans Rights calls for the opposite. Talk about foot in mouth disease from the UN. Who in their right mind would listen to anything that comes out of that bureaucratic nightmare.....
Well said, Dr Robinson. Now everyone who reads this, do ensure you pass it on to everyone you know. This has to be addressed at this coming election, or the entrenchment of this division will become too deep and inevitable civil revolt is then a far more likely eventuality. The economic and societal costs of that will be immense.
UNDRIP's Article 46.1 states that any action taken under this Declaration - which is not legally binding so aspirational only - cannot disrupt or impair a nation's official sovereignty arrangements.
Moving from a democracy ( 1 person, 1 vote) to an ethnocracy ( privileged status and rights for one race) would do exactly this. Normally a referendum would be held to obtain citizen approval (or rejection) for this change.
Labour/Maori caucus fear this formal step and so play the long game. Time is gained by saying " co-governance is common practice now", or by stating that veto action does not exist in a specific bill ( when it is there under another name). This has been amazingly successful - many now think that co- governance is already the status quo in NZ. Instead it is just a step. He Puapua confirms that full Maori governance by 2040 is the real long- term aim
National/Luxon do not support a referendum. Peters says there must be one. Seymour suggests a referendum to follow an information campaign about the real dangers of replacing democracy. So not a common stance
Prof Liz Rata calls this process a coup d' etat by stealth = deliberate non consultation with the people and she reversal would come too late.
John Robinson is right - 2023 is a crucial election.
PS Re. the question: How will UNDRIP be implemented?
Labour will use its parliamentary majority to the maximum - now or if re-elected in 2023.
Minister Jackson has prepared a NZ Action Plan to implement UNDRIP. Till now, he has not dared to put this as a Bill - too controversial as the content is probably very close (identical?) to He Puapua. Too risky in an election year.
Labour can pass this Action Plan into law - as long as it has the parliamentary majority which is part of the process of national sovereignty. It would certainly do this if it wins in 2023.
National law ( dealing with concrete issues) will usually win out over international law ( dealing with universal principles).
The logic is: the people elect a party as government which indicates approval for its manifesto . Sometimes, this might not mention a specific issue - this is how Labour operates and the public memory can be very short.
Everyone knows exactly how the stark picture, eloquently painted by John, will end if allowed to progress along the current racist path. And not just for non-Maori, but also for Maori.
It will be an unmitigated disaster and result in NZ becoming an economic and social basket case.
We've all been subjected to the woeful and inept attempts at running the country over the past 3 years when race is put first. And that's just the baby steps. If the Maori elite are granted full control then their avarice, selfishness and glaring deficiencies when it comes to national governance will be exposed for all to see.
As non-Maori leave, in droves most definitely, NZ will make Greece look like an economic powerhouse and North Korea look a paragon of social planning.
Our younger generation have a huge battle on their hands. But do they realise it? I suspect not. Molly-coddled and indulged in every identity fantasy they choose to embrace. All just a side-line to keep them occupied while their country is stolen from them.
The next election will be momentous. But even if we get a centre-right coalition that will just press pause for a few years.
National are a shadow of a true conservative party, vying with Labour to get the woke vote.
In truth, many Kiwis support these dreadful policies, I think. Out of guilt, ignorance or zeal, or some other misplaced notion.
They will only reject them when the shit hits the fan, but it will be far too late by then.
Indeed you're right DeeM. This election must be a watershed to be rid of this kind of policy, or this maorification will forever divide this country. Pushing pause will not do it, for it will raise its ugly divisive head again and again, unless there is a major change in our education/indoctrination system and a public mandate to stamp it out. If we don't get on top of it now, it will just get more and more difficult and very likely be too late. That is why National/Luxon who constantly seem to talk of the fake "Treaty Partner" are unlikely to be the country's saviours. Vote wisely.
Be wary of National - refer Luxon’s support of Tama Potaka and his co-governance commitment by any other name. It’s all out there in the public domain. Just because the word co-governance is not used and just because obfuscated concepts of partnership are, the end game is the same. And so are the twisted thinking, arguments and extraordinary extrapolations supporting twisted outcomes.
Rather than the Reversionist Revolution maybe New Zealand is undergoing the Twisted Revolution?
This government has failed at everything except for two exceptions, brainwashing first of all our children through a education system run by university marxist indoctrinated teachers and secondly cunningly buying off our media who have also been indoctrinated by our socialist university professors.
We have no body else to blame for letting this happen than ourselves.
A majority voted in MMP so half our parliamentary MPs are not even ele Ted, but appointed, this opened the door for radical and racist wannabes to implement thier social agenda.
I'm really afraid it may already be to late
I am already planning an exit strategy from New Zealand because I believe 2023 will see a Labour/Green/Maori coalition ruling after the election. And I am 82 years of age.
Hi Vic, I'll be joining you in the great coming Exit of NZ. Being a 70 year old stale pale white cis male ( who drives a ute) I don't want to be a second class citizen in my own country
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.