No, what I’m talking about is the often shocking English skills of students who aspired to a career where written English was the foundational skill. As part of the course, students frequently shared their work on the class online forums. Spelling and grammar were often atrocious. Not just the expected typos, but malapropism, repeated misspellings, and clumsy sentence construction.
This shouldn’t have surprised me too much. Some years prior, I worked in the educational sector, at a school for kids in Year 11 and 12 (Tasmania is, with Canberra, only one of two states or territories to split secondary education into “High School” and “College”). There were more than a few kids who, despite passing ten years of formal schooling, were all-but illiterate and innumerate.
How could this even happen?
Cartoon by Bill Leak
How could this even happen?
Cartoon by Bill Leak
Illiterate teenagers who copy and paste Wikipedia for assignments and maths teachers who can’t teach children to count show the need for universal testing and a “back to basics” approach in classrooms, according to new government research that exposes systemic failings in Australia’s school system.
We’re constantly told by teachers’ unions that more money is the answer. Yet, Australia has steadily increased education funding for decades, with an inverse return in students’ results.
The taxpayer-funded Australian Educational Research Organisation (AERO) is warning that one in five students are struggling at a Year 4 level of English and maths when they start high school.
Its research shows that too many high school teachers lack the training, time or teaching skill to help students with the basics of English and maths that are meant to be mastered in primary school.
I suspect that part of the problem is that, for too many, teaching has become the easy option at university. Hardly surprising, when the response to a shortage of teachers has been to lower admission standards to courses. Which ultimately means that good, dedicated and inspiring teachers are being dragged down by a whole lot of dead weight deadbeats.
And generations of children are being permanently held back.
AERO chief executive Dr Jenny Donovan said one in five students starting high school at the age of 12 or 13 have the maths and English ability of children three years younger.
“You’ve got students who just can’t read and write, so they can’t engage in lessons at school and it translates into behavioural problems or leaving school early,’’ she said.
“It is a problem that high schools don’t necessarily see it as their task to teach literacy and numeracy, even though the ability to read is necessary for students to access the rest of the curriculum.
No, they’re too busy teaching children how to bind their breasts, tuck their penises and dress in drag.
Dr Donovan said the AERO study, to be released on Monday, showed that nearly half of high schools “don’t do anything to actively address the problem’’.
Well, they can groom kids for sex changes and climate protests, or they can teach them to read and write. Guess which they choose to do?
Then there’s a national curriculum cobbled together by Long March left academics that blathers endlessly about “colonialism” and “white privilege”, but does bugger-all to teach kids anything useful.
Maths teachers said they were required to rush through teaching concepts outlined in the national curriculum and did not have time to help kids catch up.
The gross gender imbalance of teaching also appears to be a factor.
Student disengagement was flagged by a teacher from Sydney, who said young boys “will just put their pen down and not do anything’’.
“They don’t bring a pen, they won’t bring an exercise book, they won’t bring a calculator, and that would be probably 20 per cent of our cohort across the school,’’ the teacher said.
Why on earth would boys be so disengaged? Could it possibly have anything to do with a profession overwhelmingly dominated by women and obsessed with raising girls’ standards — when girls are already out-competing boys in results — and feminising the curriculum and the classroom?
You know the answer, of course.
Lushington describes himself as Punk rock philosopher. Liberalist contrarian. Grumpy old bastard. This article was first published HERE
4 comments:
Once upon a time we had the Matricualtion exam which had to be passed to go to secondary school. As teachers strove to achieve passes, even those who never would were brought alongside the others to levels only dreamed of now.
My primary school teachers in the early 60s had mostly left high school before completing it, gone to Teachers College for a couple of years, and then spent the next half century teaching kiddies to read and write and do sums.
On the whole, they were remarkably successful. What a cost-effective system that was!
Now, we make then finish Form 7, send them to varsity, and put a little mortarboard on their head at the end of it. They think they're intellectuals now, too good for the job, certainly too good to do mundane things like teach kiddies to read and write and do sums (which after all many have problems with themselves).
The outcome should not surprise anybody. Go figure.
I don’t think it is feminising the life out of boys. I think it is lack of discipline. We would work hard and disciplined then every few weeks our teacher would take the class out to play rounders. A great reward everyone was active and engaged.
This is the inevitably end result of progressive education. What else could you
expect from a iconoclastic ideology which ridicules every thing traditional and promotes itself with hollow rhetoric but has produced devastating failure. It has been for almost a hundred years the secret enemy slowly but surely white-anteing our educational foundations.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.