Within a ‘tent’ of politically astute colleagues with whom I have been assessing the political parody which plagues our fast-disappearing paradise, a distasteful outcome emerged over tea and cakes and that is:
The next general election, will see National and Labour form a coalition.
Whereas WW2 was used as justification for a similar route last century, this next display of unity will present the economy as the justification for perfidy.
The real reasons might better be described as:
Anything goes to get one’s hands on the levers of power.
In the case of Labour:
(a) Labour will get about 30 percent of the vote and massively reduced electorate seats. Note: The once in nine elections outright win by Labour i.e., no coalition partner required in 2020, won’t be repeated. Therefore, a coalition partner is essential.
(b) Maori Party is too extreme as a collation partner, even for Labour, which has always seen itself as the true political face of mainstream Maori. (1)
(c) “Woke” does not resonate with traditional conservative Labour voters (such as my maternal grandfather).
(d) Greens are a closet enemy taking list votes from Labour.
(e) Greens won’t have sufficient List votes to make a Labour Green collation – without radical Maori.(f) Paradoxically National displays a distinctly “woke” flavour and appears not to have taken the challenge to stop Labour’s crusade to elevate Maori rights above all other Kiwis.
Conclusion? Labour National coalition.
In the case of National:
In the case of National:
(a) National will get about 30 per cent of the vote with a major recovery of electorates but few list MPs. Therefore, a coalition partner is essential.
(b) ACT will get a big list vote but maybe not enough for a National ACT collation.
(c) Maori Party is too extreme for the conservative voters who will deliver the electorates back to National.
(d) Greens don’t count with conservative rural Natz.
(e) Labour “woke” virus is rampant in National
(f) National is not united against the Maori policies of Labour.
Conclusion? National Labour coalition.
PS I am not anti Maori. In fact, I have royal Māori pedigree. I am however anti elevation of one ethnic group above all other. (2)
The TENT?
The ‘tent’ is a cabal of colleagues with vast political experience. Full disclosure of its activities during the past 18 months would probably stun many. Former MPs, successful business and primary industries players are included among hard core supporters of National as it was.
“National as it was”, pre 2020 election performance when the party lost over four hundred thousand supporters.
“National as it was”, before National’s current ambivalence on equality for all before the law and their apparent affection for “woke” rather than “wakeup” and save New Zealand.
One member of “the tent” has wool board pedigree and was with me when I formed the first political party under MMP i.e. Right of Centre party. (3) Another has several primary industries board positions. Another is a financial adviser - female to boot. Two, predictably, are ex cops. And, we have the inevitable lawyer tag along.
RoC was named reflecting the centre right economic philosophy I had come to embrace during my three terms elected as National’s representative for what is now more or less the Northland seat.
RoC later adopted the name of Conservatives but failed at the polls as with every other party formed subsequent to the introduction of Jim Anderton’s preferred option of systems presented to the public by Jim Bolger, as an alternative to First Past the Post.
MMP was the worst possible choice in my view, and along with a former National MP colleague Graeme Reeves, I was hostile to the concept from day one.
ACT survived because National finally realised that unless they gave an electorate to a minor party, they would not have the numbers to form a government. Richard Prebble returned to the House via Wellington Central. (4)
Jim Anderton and Winston Peters were already set up as electorate MPs.
Which brings us back to the fact that the MMP window opened by Jim Bolger, now ensures that the next government for New Zealand will be a coalition.
I’ve made a prediction. Your call.
Oh. One more factor. Winston. Not a minnow. (5) (6)
While Winston is drawing reasonable audiences around the country, he is not making the impact that he has previously, but never write him off. If he picked up Julian Batchelor, that might get him over the line as he needs a hard single message. But Batchelor’s message may not resonate with Shane Jones.
Footnotes:
The TENT?
The ‘tent’ is a cabal of colleagues with vast political experience. Full disclosure of its activities during the past 18 months would probably stun many. Former MPs, successful business and primary industries players are included among hard core supporters of National as it was.
“National as it was”, pre 2020 election performance when the party lost over four hundred thousand supporters.
“National as it was”, before National’s current ambivalence on equality for all before the law and their apparent affection for “woke” rather than “wakeup” and save New Zealand.
One member of “the tent” has wool board pedigree and was with me when I formed the first political party under MMP i.e. Right of Centre party. (3) Another has several primary industries board positions. Another is a financial adviser - female to boot. Two, predictably, are ex cops. And, we have the inevitable lawyer tag along.
RoC was named reflecting the centre right economic philosophy I had come to embrace during my three terms elected as National’s representative for what is now more or less the Northland seat.
RoC later adopted the name of Conservatives but failed at the polls as with every other party formed subsequent to the introduction of Jim Anderton’s preferred option of systems presented to the public by Jim Bolger, as an alternative to First Past the Post.
MMP was the worst possible choice in my view, and along with a former National MP colleague Graeme Reeves, I was hostile to the concept from day one.
ACT survived because National finally realised that unless they gave an electorate to a minor party, they would not have the numbers to form a government. Richard Prebble returned to the House via Wellington Central. (4)
Jim Anderton and Winston Peters were already set up as electorate MPs.
Which brings us back to the fact that the MMP window opened by Jim Bolger, now ensures that the next government for New Zealand will be a coalition.
I’ve made a prediction. Your call.
Oh. One more factor. Winston. Not a minnow. (5) (6)
While Winston is drawing reasonable audiences around the country, he is not making the impact that he has previously, but never write him off. If he picked up Julian Batchelor, that might get him over the line as he needs a hard single message. But Batchelor’s message may not resonate with Shane Jones.
Footnotes:
- Labour deserves the Māori vote given the all of the favour in funds, open representative doors, co-governance and special rights they have granted Māori at the cost of significant political capital from those previous conservative Labour supporters who find this favour abhorrent - some of whom are attracted to Julian Batchelor's meetings.
- https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/ross_meurant_re_writing_history_to_suit_contemporary_agendas_will_produce_blowback_from_ordinary_kiwis
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Conservative_Party
- ACT in the Provinces will do well with list votes, going nearer to 20% than 10% - with National voters breaking from tradition and splitting their constituency and list votes.
- Matt King's - democracy outfit have lost some of their best people and lost their momentum as a consequence. The other minors – Christians included - are not going anywhere.
- A wasted vote of up to 10% looks likely.
Ross Meurant. B.A. M.P.P. Former police inspector. Former Member of Parliament.
13 comments:
This view predicts that the same actors - ( as we know , all hopeless ) - will have new power conferred on them to continue to run NZ.
Leave ASAP!
Plausible, but heaven help NZ if that's the outcome.
If so, I'll be off to Australia - and I'll wager I won't be alone.
And all fundamentally because the woke invertebrate, Luxon (and minions) won't get firmly off the fence and there is a significant portion of the country that are largely ignorant of what is going on and have been let down by our MSM.
That said, I remain hopeful that there will be a landslide away from Labour/Greens/Te Pati Maori due to their now proven incompetence and radical divisiveness and that those otherwise thinking of voting for those other minor parties that are clearly struggling to get over the line (that have little in the way of policies and succession plans) will realise their folly and vote ACT.
Government has always been a uniparty of bad actors. As a corporation with its own corporate agenda, politicians just take turns sitting as board members around the corporate table. Nothing will change for we the people until we break up this corporate structure. Every separate government department including local governments are corporations.
The "tent" may be full of political experience, but political wisdom may have stayed at home. There will not be a grand coalition. Why? Because Labour does not need National and National does not need Labour. It's no more complicated than that.
The outcome will be either Labour/Greens, Labour/Greens/Maori or National/Act. (NZ First may be in the mix and add a possibility that they will give confidence and supply to either National or Labour and sit on the cross benches).
These are the only scenarios and only one will play out post 14 October.
Ross. Whether your your purpose was either to stimulate debate or scare the horses, your article does focus my mind on options to avoid such an unpalatable outcome.
It is a clarion which I hear and do not discard as totally unreasonable.
Might work if both parties ditched all maori m.p.s or insisted on some declaration of allegiance to democaracy and equality and the comon good and undertook nto to support any race favouring or separatist policuies, abandon the WT, maori as an official languageetc etc. Otherwise will just have a policy determining maori caucus even bigger than the present.
No No can't bear it. Don't think so anyway. By no means all Nat candidates are woke. And ACT will get such a load of votes, they will have the power to direct matters.
Most here miss the point. Which is if ACT+ Nat dont make 61 seats
AND Labour + Green dont make 61 seats
And both sides see the Maoris as too demanding / toxic to entertain
THEN the collation of Nat + Labour become a very posibilty if not probability
Yes .All very interesting. More interesting is the possibility of Act being one of the two major parties in the 2026 election ,with national being no 3 . Oh the joy of it . As a life time national voter who has to gratingly (electorate)vote National before joyously party voting ACTthis time around I look forward to the day when once again we have a true rt wing govt in chargeagain . One that understands that the money has to be earned first before being handed out to all insunderary
Anonymous said...
"Most here miss the point. Which is if ACT+ Nat dont make 61 seats
AND Labour + Green dont make 61 seats
And both sides see the Maoris as too demanding / toxic to entertain
THEN the collation of Nat + Labour become a very posibilty if not probability."
No. National will suck up to the Greens if they have to... Luxon has already demomstrated he believes in the global warming hoax (eg the Maureen Pugh muzzle). So the combo would be National and Act in coalition, Greens with minister outside cabinet giving confidence and supply.
for those thinking of moving to aussie it would be out of the fire into the frying pan.aussie is just as communist as nz.aboriginal landrights were planned by the australian communist party in 1948.they think a long way ahead.the only difference between nz & aussie is that they have state govts which don't like being told what to do by the federal govt so that creats a buffer. nz doesn't have that so that is our problem.
Terence
NZ as a state of Aussie had loomed as a 'good idea' but your comment does support the view that the virus which ravages New Zealand, is not confined to our shores by what was once tyranny of distance.
At least the leader of National's bedfellow in Oz - Mr Dutton (an x cop) displays the fortitude I fail to detect in the the NZ version of Liberals i.e. National.
So, does one tend the roses (as I have of recent months done) or does one fight?
kerry packer said in the mid 1990s when the rest of the world is coming out of communism why is australia still going into it? a man i think knew something about the world.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.