The number of children reliant on a benefit is at its highest point since Labour became government in 2017.
The number - 211,617 - even surpasses the total at the end of 2020 after the chaos of Covid. The number is 26% higher than in March 2018, the end of labour’s first full quarter. Over 43,000 more children are now dependent on welfare. Was that the price former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was willing to pay in her naive pursuit of poverty reduction? It was a massive risk to keep increasing benefit rates and tax credits for children. This is the result.
The majority of children on welfare are attached to single parents. Those with Māori ethnicity[i] make up the largest and fastest growing group of sole parents on welfare. This is not a win for the country or Māori.
Click to view
Click to view
The degree of dependency is worsening:
Click to view
Long-term dependency on welfare translates into more child abuse and neglect, truancy, youth and eventually adult crime.
And there is another huge concern.
11.2 percent of the working age population is now reliant on a main benefit – up from 11 percent a year ago.
Click image to view
Over 7,000 more people can't support themselves through work. Yet the most recent unemployment rate available is low, at 3.4 percent in March this year. The continuing story still seems to be one of employers crying out for staff.
But a fair chunk of the increase is sickness related with 3,000 more people on the Supported Living Payment (which used to be called the Invalid's benefit) and 3,000 more on the Job Seeker/Health Condition or Disability (formerly the Sickness benefit). The largest and most rapidly growing incapacity is psychological or psychiatric.
Mental health - or more accurately, mental ill-health - is an epidemic.
When Labour said they would put $2 billion more into mental health we didn't think they meant benefits.
Anyone with personal experience, first-hand or through friends or family members, knows there is next to no help available beyond anti-depressants. It's a dire situation.
This quarterly data is the last we will see before the election in October.
Make your own mind up. But by no stretch of the imagination can Labour claim to have made a positive difference to dependence on welfare during their two terms in government.
[i] During Labour’s term the way ethnicity is recorded by the Ministry of Social Development was changed from the ‘priority’ to ‘total’ method. A beneficiary with more than one ethnicity will be counted in each group meaning that total claimants sum to more than 100 percent.
Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare commentator who blogs HERE
3 comments:
All by design.
Precisely. All done to ensure more voters in the future. That and the dumbing down of the population through declining education achievement levels - all to ensure a growing proletariat, albeit the latter are supposed to be 'working-class' not idle. Can't help but feel that Labour have played directly into the Greens (aka, the Benefits Party's) hands.
Our education system is a failure but it seems to have equipped large numbers to logically compare a life of work with a tedious permanent partner, forever burdend by housuing and budgeting problem,. with a secure gauranteed life in a nice new heated, insulated, secure, state unit on a benefit, fully indexed with no fear of sudden discontinuation, as experienced by mug employees.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.