This is the third of a series of eight articles exposing some of the myths about New Zealand's History, now being taught to secondary school students.
Article 1 can be seen HERE, Article 2 HERE.
The series of articles was written as a critique to the editor of ESA publications, Jo Crichton and the author of the text book, F J Gibson. This critique was sent in October last year - to date there has been no reply.
ARTICLE 3 - EXPOSING HISTORY CURRICULUM MYTHS
The 2nd Myth: That Maori invented trench warfare, and differing viewpoints over Maori land ownership, by The NZ Company and the Crown.
Pg 24-25 The Wairau Incident 1843
The NZ Company believed it had
purchased 50000 acres in the Wairau valley Te Rauparaha and Te Rangihaeata
thought otherwise. Captain Arthur Wakefield tried to clear the land of Maori
and proceeded to arrest both chiefs for arson. In his attempt to do so a gun
was accidently discharged. In the firing that followed about 22 settlers were
killed along with 5 Maori including Te Rangihaeata's wife.
Governor Fitzroy failed to assert
British authority over this issue. Maori had expected him to claim the district
in compensation for the blood shed i.e. exact utu as this was Maori custom. By
failing to do so led Te Raupraraha to form a very low opinion of the Governor.
“He is soft, he is a pumpkin”. Settlers and the NZ Company never forgave
Fitzroy for his lack of response to the killings at Wairau.
Other conflicts also developed with
regards to the NZ Company’s purchases of land in Wellington 1841-42 which are
not mentioned. These all relate to who was
nominally in possession of the land. After 1825, Ngati Toa under Te
Rauparaha, with his allies Ngati Tama, Ngati Mutanga and Te Atiawa, came to
dominate the Horowhenua and Manawatu, and all the way south to the Cook Strait.
Lethal attacks were made on Rangitane and Ngaj Tahu in the upper South Island
after 1827, by Ngati Toa. The confusing muddle of tribes in the Wellington
region created a problem when the New
Zealand land Company began purchasing land in 1840-42,as to whom it belonged to
and who was paid for it. It required much skill from Land Commissioner Spain to
resolve land purchases.
Pg 29 The build up to the
Northern Wars.
The Northern Wars 1844-45 came about
from Hone Heke’s loss of “mana” once the government relocated to Auckland in
1841. Cutting down of the flag was an attack on British sovereignty, and a sign
of defiance to that authority. The continued attack on the flagpole amounted to
insurrection, as it could have led to further conflict elsewhere in NZ, and
Fitzroy needed to take a stand.
Fitzroy had to clearly demonstrate
that the government could bring force to bear to maintain order and uphold
British law. Fitzroy also had come to realise in 1845, when watching a mock
battle between 6000 warriors - led by Potatou Wherowhero and local Auckland
tribes - that he had no manpower to enforce and maintain British law in the
colony. The Northern War was as much a civil conflict between Ngapuhi chiefs -
Hone Heke and Puki Kawiti versus Tamati Waka Nene, and his brother Patuone,
Nene was the leading chief during the
signing of the Treaty. Several battles - eg Puketutu, 8 May 1845, 54 of the
British troops and 80 Maori were killed, with Nene giving his assistance.
While being present with the British
for the attack on Ohaewai Pa, Nene didn’t partake due to Despard’s reckless
leadership. This saw 43 British troops killed plus 73 wounded. Previously to
this at Te Ahuaki,June 2. Heke attacked Nene at Puketutu. Nene defeated Heke’s
superior force, 300 vs 500 warriors, in an open battle.
Ruapekapeka Pa - built by Kawiti -
was constantly shelled over a month. About 60 Maori were killed during this
period, along with 12 British soldiers. Both Waka Nene and Puatone with 450
warriors gave support to the
British in the assault on the pa.
Eventually Kawiti evacuated the pa and consequently opposition melted away.
Villages that had been loyal to Heke were destroyed near Waitangi in May 1845.
The Northern Wars achieved little. However Maori could see what would follow by
attacking British settlements, as at Russell. There was to be no retribution.
Heke and Kawiti negotiated peace and
Governor Grey decided not to confiscate land on advice by Nene. Fitzroy earlier
had been determined that confiscations would occur and the land given to chiefs
loyal to the Crown. Grey however absolved all of any recriminations, which led
Nene to remain a friend and ally of Grey.
A myth, developed by James Belich,
that the lack of British success at both Ohaewai and Ruapekepeka was due to the
Maori invention of trench warfare. He would go on to say that this Maori
invention was used in World War One. In 1998, military historian Ken Stead
debunked this myth. The trenches in WW1 were a direct copy of seige trenches
and fieldwork's used in Europe for centuries. Cliff Simmons explained later
that trenches developed by Maori at Ohaewai Pa could be readily explained by
Ngapuhi chiefs going to England in 1820-21. While visiting the military school
at Chatham they would have gained information studying fortification's before
acquiring weapons. This myth, that Maori invented trench warfare and was
adapted for use in WW1,is explained in the video and seen by students, and was
still being touted by TVNZ in November 2022.
Pg 30 The Kingitanga and Maori
king movement.
The text comment that the NZ Company
claimed that Maori had restricted land rights only to land they occupied with
villages and gardens is quite inaccurate. The original view of the NZ Company
was that Maori were sovereign so they owned and therefor could sell land to
whom they liked leading to the company protesting against the Crown’s right of
pre-emption which followed in 1840. The concept of pre- emption meant that the
British government acquired all title to land in New Zealand whereby aboriginal
title had been extinguished with the transfer of sovereignty, this also
included all navigable rivers and the foreshore.
The British Government intervention
in creating a NZ colony was due to actions by the NZ Company in its land
purchases in 1839. Much of the South Island was also eagerly being sought after
by New South Wales landowners such as Charles Wentworth. All previous land
sales had to be confirmed by the Crown, which it did between 1840-1843.
An attempt was made for the Crown to
assume control over wasteland - that is, land uncultivated by Maori - with the
premise that there were no “native rights”
to undeveloped land. This concept had taken hold in North America and
Australia, and elsewhere.
This idea was mooted in the House of
Lords inquiry into New Zealand, but dropped at the insistence of humanitarians
and missionaries alike. Much debate took place over what was Native title.
Busby argued that the first clause
in the 2nd Article confirmed natives as owners of the land - in its fullest and
extensively (he had, after all, put this clause into the Treaty). Much debate
ensued in the British parliament for over 3 days. The Missionary society
petitioned the House of Lords that the treaty guaranteed full and undisputed
possession of land unless sold by Maori.
Grey reasserted the Crown’s rights
of preemption when becoming Governor in 1845. He met opposition to this as many
settlers maintained that the 3rd Article gave the Natives the same rights as
British subjects which meant they could dispose of their land as they saw fit.
Grey, during his time, made many
large scale purchases of land. But this process had become bogged down in the
late 1850s under Governor Brown due to difficulties in identifying a discrete
group of claimants. Various groups would
complain they either had not been consulted, or else their claim not
recognised, nor paid for.
Grey opposed the attempt with
regards to “wastelands” being acquired directly by the Crown. Missionaries such
as Bishop Selwyn and notable colonists
also protested. Maori became aware of the attempt to introduce this policy and
like-wise protested. Grey even ensured that Kemp’s purchase from Ngai Tahu was
correctly acquired by the Crown.
Between 1846-1853 32.6 million acres
were purchased, and native title was finally defined by this activity.
Maori Native Customary Title changed
to Native Title which later lead to the Land Court established in 1862.
Previously Maori land rights were based on ancestry by right of conquest,
gifting and exercised through occupation. Tribal boundaries were often blurred
and there were often areas of “no man’s land” between tribal occupied land.
3 comments:
I hope this series is being widely dsistributed to MPs, the Min of Ed, Teaching Council, Principals. For many mps the reponse will likely be the most comprehensive history of NZ they have read. And for maori mps the only objective one. Unfortuantely most like me will not have the textbook to hand.
Thank you for pointing out these serious errors in the history curriculum . Without rigorous research like this we wouldn't have a clue. What will future histories say looking back on this era of turning history into a study in brainwashing into cancel culture ?
Thanks for these authoritative accounts of history. It would be helpful to have more references and clarity regarding how this history is contradicted by what is in NZ school curriculum.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.