Great one-liners like these have always been part of politics because it’s always been about style and substance. Great comms can inspire us, help us to make necessary changes, or unite us when there’s a crisis. But what happens when it’s about image first and substance last – when politics becomes comms – when it’s more about the message, and less about the result?
This Labour government’s really good at comms, and that’s been important in some tough situations, like responding to the mosque terror attacks. But great comms should be like the tip of an iceberg and underneath, there should be some serious weight, some intellectual grunt, carefully crafted policies. Right now, it seems like politics is all tip and no iceberg.
The trouble is, this doesn’t get results. Rhetoric doesn’t change reality – just look at our COVID response. We had all the wordsmithing in the world. We were a “team of five million” – except for the Kiwis overseas who were shut out by an MIQ lottery that breached the Bill of Rights Act. We were going to “go hard, go early” – but experts said our testing strategy was “reactive and conservative”. We were told endlessly to “be kind”- then the PM quite happily created a two-tier society designed to marginalise anyone who wasn’t vaccinated.
And it’s not just COVID policy. This government promised to solve the housing crisis with 100,000 KiwiBuild houses in 10 years. So far, we’ve got 1300 houses in 5 years – just 98,700 to go! Compassionate public leadership after the mosque terror attacks was followed by ill-conceived hate speech proposals. During the pandemic, the Government tried to brief “COVID commentators” to improve its public image. They promised to be the most transparent government ever but, says one senior journalist, have turned out to be “one of the most thin-skinned and secretive” she’s experienced.
So why do politicians do this? One reason is that we let them. We even reward them for it. Labour went from zero to hero in the 2017 election campaign with nothing more than a change of leader, a hashtag, and some impossible promises. If that’s what it takes to win our votes, expect to see more of it.
There’s a deeper reason too. The media we use make us treat politics like entertainment. A famous media theorist called Neil Postman predicted this. Back in the 80s, he wrote a book called Amusing Ourselves to Death – the title kind of gives away what he thought was the problem. The issue in his day was television, but everything he said applies even more strongly to our age of social media. Any new medium, he said, creates “new forms of truth-telling” by privileging certain kinds of content. These days, communication is tweetable, Instagrammable, and simplistic – and therefore, so is truth. But it doesn’t have to be.
Here’s three things we can do about this.
First, we can expect politicians to show some leadership, give us more than just soundbites and treat us like adults – and when they do, we should reward them for it with our support.
Second, cultivate a bit of healthy realism and ask what the facts really are. If a politician tells you something that sounds too good to be true, it probably is – even if it comes in a beautiful narrative package.
Third, ask yourself some questions about your own media consumption. Check what you’re paying attention to – don’t just feed on a diet of social media, get out of the echo chamber, and find independent voices you can trust.
Style’s great, but it’s not enough by itself. Let’s put some substance back in the public square.
Alex Penk is an independent researcher and writer with a background in law and public policy. This article was originally published by The Common Room and is published here with kind permission.
The trouble is, this doesn’t get results. Rhetoric doesn’t change reality – just look at our COVID response. We had all the wordsmithing in the world. We were a “team of five million” – except for the Kiwis overseas who were shut out by an MIQ lottery that breached the Bill of Rights Act. We were going to “go hard, go early” – but experts said our testing strategy was “reactive and conservative”. We were told endlessly to “be kind”- then the PM quite happily created a two-tier society designed to marginalise anyone who wasn’t vaccinated.
And it’s not just COVID policy. This government promised to solve the housing crisis with 100,000 KiwiBuild houses in 10 years. So far, we’ve got 1300 houses in 5 years – just 98,700 to go! Compassionate public leadership after the mosque terror attacks was followed by ill-conceived hate speech proposals. During the pandemic, the Government tried to brief “COVID commentators” to improve its public image. They promised to be the most transparent government ever but, says one senior journalist, have turned out to be “one of the most thin-skinned and secretive” she’s experienced.
So why do politicians do this? One reason is that we let them. We even reward them for it. Labour went from zero to hero in the 2017 election campaign with nothing more than a change of leader, a hashtag, and some impossible promises. If that’s what it takes to win our votes, expect to see more of it.
There’s a deeper reason too. The media we use make us treat politics like entertainment. A famous media theorist called Neil Postman predicted this. Back in the 80s, he wrote a book called Amusing Ourselves to Death – the title kind of gives away what he thought was the problem. The issue in his day was television, but everything he said applies even more strongly to our age of social media. Any new medium, he said, creates “new forms of truth-telling” by privileging certain kinds of content. These days, communication is tweetable, Instagrammable, and simplistic – and therefore, so is truth. But it doesn’t have to be.
Here’s three things we can do about this.
First, we can expect politicians to show some leadership, give us more than just soundbites and treat us like adults – and when they do, we should reward them for it with our support.
Second, cultivate a bit of healthy realism and ask what the facts really are. If a politician tells you something that sounds too good to be true, it probably is – even if it comes in a beautiful narrative package.
Third, ask yourself some questions about your own media consumption. Check what you’re paying attention to – don’t just feed on a diet of social media, get out of the echo chamber, and find independent voices you can trust.
Style’s great, but it’s not enough by itself. Let’s put some substance back in the public square.
Alex Penk is an independent researcher and writer with a background in law and public policy. This article was originally published by The Common Room and is published here with kind permission.
2 comments:
To add a couple of other specious one-liners, you have Winston with his he's not "after the baubles of office" and now, Labour with it's, equally implausible "we are in it for you" when clearly they are all in it only for themselves.
Alex, I think you're perhaps setting your sights too high expecting politicians to come up with some real "substance."
"The world is boiling " is the most recent one liner that media and nitwits have grasped breathlessly. It is quite impossible to substantiate when there are two opposite seasonal cycles without the need to put your head in the kettle and run outside to test the difference.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.