You will remember this story. Parent or not, this is this tragic story that hit a nerve with all of us. It was just such a sad waste of young lives, families destroyed, and a community torn apart. Just a horrible, horrible story.
The young driver, the only survivor of the crash, pleaded guilty to five charges of dangerous driving causing death. He was jailed for two years and six months. He was 19 years old at the time of the crash. He had been drinking alcohol and had obtained a restricted licence just three days earlier, and one of the victims was in the boot of the car.
At the time, the families of the five teenagers aged between 15 and 16, they were pleased to see the driver jailed, but felt 2 1/2 years was not long enough. The sentence, which took place in June 2022, considered the aggravating factors of the case, but discounts were also taken into consideration. 25% discount for the early guilty plea, 15% for youth, 10% for remorse and 5% for good character. You can understand how the family felt 2 1/2 years was not long enough.
Last month, the Parole board heard that there was no further treatment available to this young man in prison. He was assessed as low risk of reoffending. He had a good release plan in place and showed remorse apparently, as this was second time round that he'd been through the parole system and so has been released on parole. And it was no surprise that last night one of the fathers of the deceased said it was a system about the living, not about the dead.
The sentencing of this young man and his release is not going to have any impact on the outcome and that is that those young boys are never coming back. But those victims need to be considered, their families need to be considered, and only those in a situation such as this, who have lived through a tragic situation like this, can tell us the impact of the sentence and the parole on them. It won't take away the pain, but I'm sure it goes some way to offering some comfort.
Obviously, we will all be thinking about the role of discounting and sentencing in general and the parole system. If discounting can play a part, then surely parole should not be an option until a longer length of the sentence has been fulfilled. The restrictions on this young driver, they're good. He's not out living a free life. The consequences of his actions will still weigh on him. In place until the end of 2024, he is subject to a curfew from 9:00 PM to 6:00 AM daily. He will have electronic monitoring in order to monitor this. And once this curfew expires, he must reside at an address approved in writing by a probation officer.
Until December 2024 he's banned from entering the Timaru or Temuka districts and the eastern suburbs of Christchurch without permission. He must not possess, use or consume alcohol or controlled drugs. He's got to attend alcohol and drug and psychological assessments. He cannot have any contact or associate with any victim, and he cannot drive. He cannot be in the possession of, or have an interest in, a motor vehicle, so they have put quite a lot of restrictions on him.
So, being out of prison in the community, being monitored like this, under these restrictions, is it possibly a better way to rehabilitate this young person to make sure he goes on to be a good man? Or maybe like one of the parents said, honours her son and the other boys by being the person that makes change, that teaches people about the dangers of drunk driving.
Then maybe the system, even if it does work in favour of the living is a good way forward. Or does releasing this young man just a year into his sentence, pretty much make a mockery of the system. I believe it probably does.
Francesca is a well known film reviewer, writes for NZ Herald's Timeout magazine, and contributes to Jack Tame's Newstalk show. This article was first published HERE
At the time, the families of the five teenagers aged between 15 and 16, they were pleased to see the driver jailed, but felt 2 1/2 years was not long enough. The sentence, which took place in June 2022, considered the aggravating factors of the case, but discounts were also taken into consideration. 25% discount for the early guilty plea, 15% for youth, 10% for remorse and 5% for good character. You can understand how the family felt 2 1/2 years was not long enough.
Last month, the Parole board heard that there was no further treatment available to this young man in prison. He was assessed as low risk of reoffending. He had a good release plan in place and showed remorse apparently, as this was second time round that he'd been through the parole system and so has been released on parole. And it was no surprise that last night one of the fathers of the deceased said it was a system about the living, not about the dead.
The sentencing of this young man and his release is not going to have any impact on the outcome and that is that those young boys are never coming back. But those victims need to be considered, their families need to be considered, and only those in a situation such as this, who have lived through a tragic situation like this, can tell us the impact of the sentence and the parole on them. It won't take away the pain, but I'm sure it goes some way to offering some comfort.
Obviously, we will all be thinking about the role of discounting and sentencing in general and the parole system. If discounting can play a part, then surely parole should not be an option until a longer length of the sentence has been fulfilled. The restrictions on this young driver, they're good. He's not out living a free life. The consequences of his actions will still weigh on him. In place until the end of 2024, he is subject to a curfew from 9:00 PM to 6:00 AM daily. He will have electronic monitoring in order to monitor this. And once this curfew expires, he must reside at an address approved in writing by a probation officer.
Until December 2024 he's banned from entering the Timaru or Temuka districts and the eastern suburbs of Christchurch without permission. He must not possess, use or consume alcohol or controlled drugs. He's got to attend alcohol and drug and psychological assessments. He cannot have any contact or associate with any victim, and he cannot drive. He cannot be in the possession of, or have an interest in, a motor vehicle, so they have put quite a lot of restrictions on him.
So, being out of prison in the community, being monitored like this, under these restrictions, is it possibly a better way to rehabilitate this young person to make sure he goes on to be a good man? Or maybe like one of the parents said, honours her son and the other boys by being the person that makes change, that teaches people about the dangers of drunk driving.
Then maybe the system, even if it does work in favour of the living is a good way forward. Or does releasing this young man just a year into his sentence, pretty much make a mockery of the system. I believe it probably does.
Francesca is a well known film reviewer, writes for NZ Herald's Timeout magazine, and contributes to Jack Tame's Newstalk show. This article was first published HERE
6 comments:
I have no personal interest in this case but the young man (boy) made a mistake while doing what every boy does; Showing off.
The mistake was a bad one, costing and affecting lives but I doubt there is a red-blooded New Zealand male who cannot look back and see some stupid act he did that could, given the circumstance (availability of a fast cat and a group of admiring associates) have had similar consequences.
Of course his shortened punishment will see upset parents but had the boy served in jail until old age and senility forced his release, there would still be family members unhappy about that release - that is human nature.
This story is far more about the media vultures who produce the "shock - horror" stories at every opportunities and the half-wit commentators too lazy to actually earn a living finding actual news.
You have written a comprehensive, balanced account of an appallingly tragic event, and the subsequent determinations of the judiciary. Thank you. Nothing can change for the grief of the families and the agony of the driver and his family. If this young man has the strength to go on living with his guilt, there is nothing to be gained by his doing so in prison. He cannot ever be 'let off' Far better that he does what he can out in the world. Of course this is not a mockery of the system - not 'merciful' but rational.
and a samurai sword attack gets you only 10 months home detention .
Justice has not been done.
Once again the perpetrators of crime are given more consideration than the victims.
The problem with the justice system is all the sentencing off sets. Those least likely to offend have few off sets, those most have the most.
Seems strange that a person can committed a crime, but have light punishment due to off sets. Yet they are most likely to re offend.
Rights of victims mean nothing. In this case, rights of the living criminal outweigh his dead victims and their living families.
would it be okay for one of the parents to shoot this pos and plead remorse and agree to electronic monitoring for the rest of their lives? i'm sure i would sign up for that plan.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.