Really?
Isn’t there an old adage about poor workman who blames their tools?
It is remarkable that even after the success and stability of countries where democracy recognizes and values the vote of very poor and the very rich in equal measure (India) there appears to a belief by the perpetually aggrieved that democracy no longer serves our collective purpose. If fault is to be found, It is not the concept of citizen control of democracy; rather it is what is washed ashore by our system of representative democracy which is where the problems lays.
The real question, easily identified, is whether or not representative democracy delivers the quality of people needed to govern and manage a multi-million/billion-dollar enterprise in an ever increasingly complex world. Wisdom, experience, knowledge, judgment may be old fashioned virtues yet are essential elements in sound public policy administration. Some still want 16 year olds to help govern us all. Those who oppose one person one vote are effectively saying they want free reign to change the system to one that better allows for those who believe they know best to impose their will on the silent majority.
Readers will be aware of an organization (also critical of our democracy) called The World Economic Forum and chaired by the autocratic Klaus Schwab. That organization appears to want a UN styled organization – perhaps without its constant failures (see Ukraine and Gaza) so the template is all about authority and control by those who consider themselves to better understand what our needs are. Quote “You will own nothing, but you will be happy” under their new concept. A concept far closer to communism than democracy.
It is unlikely to be a coincidence that a new organization has surfaced in short order after it became clear the election in NZ was won by the centre right. One Helmut Modlik heads a new organization which he believes will save us all from ourselves. They call it - Re: Shape. Mr Modlik is currently CEO of Te Runanga Rangatira and who believes democracy in NZ is, well, old and outdated. This organization would appear to have strong philosophical links to the Co Governance movement and has attracted support from newby Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau. The Mayor of Central Otago Tim Cadogen also threw his personal support behind Re: Shape. He did the same with Co governance but without the sign off from the people of the area he supposedly represents. A question for these two mayors - who appear less than convinced by a system that elected them to office and leadership - is-why one person, one vote is not fit for the purpose anymore. Exactly what other aspect of our democracy is fundamentally broken is unknown or worse, casually ignored in favour of joining what a handful of fleeting players call Re: Shape. By all means let’s have a discussion but leave the vested interest administrators at home.
In recent years, we have as a country implemented MMP and lowered the voting age to 18. There is a real question as to whether MMP has delivered an enhanced democracy or whether MMP is a false narrative of inclusivity, signifying nothing of value to democracy. We are now paying councillors and MPs a comfortable wage where keeping a seat of authority becomes an opportunity for a lifelong occupation.
It is noted
that the appointed Local Government advisory group to review themselves was in itself
no way democratic but was made up of local government insiders especially appointed by a sympathetic Minister to review
their own performance which hardly engenders confidence in the review.
Despite a
vast opposition to the three water proposal and co governance, this small Re: Shape group
appears to disregard the wisdom of crowds in favour of their own limited
understanding that the consequences of being wrong - actually matters. Mayor
Cadogen speaks of short term populist policies as proof that we need a rethink
yet fails to mention exactly what are the policies to which he refers that are short
term and popular. That would be helpful,
as, despite statements to the contrary - our water ways here in Otago are not
heavily polluted - our health system is the best a 2nd world country
can afford. Our major problems are all as a result of public administration of
education, health, social wellbeing. These are serious, identifiable problems
and have been done so by the world famous “Dunedin study” some 50 years ago.
Our representatives have stood by and just chattered, so it is not democracy
that is the problem. It’s all the wrong people that fail to implement change
when change is needed. Some just want to remain in positions of
authority and have done for far too long. Locally, it’s not democracy’s fault
that it cost two local men in Alexandra $640,000 just to seek permission from council to make
their Earnscleugh homestead watertight. It’s very poor judgment by those in
positions of authority.
So, it’s
all about creating opportunity for more democracy to flourish, not diminish. It’s
about genuine representative democracy hearing and understanding the needs of
the people. It’s all about ceaseless vigilance to defend being free to choose who
those people shall be.
Gerry Eckhoff is a former councillor
on the Otago Regional Council and MP.
4 comments:
I find it hard to believe that we have people in authority who do not seem to understand what democracy is about. If they have a better system, let's hear about it, otherwise they should be given the order of the boot!
Kevan
Direct democracy, elected representation only, small government. Sorted.
(Goes without saying that there will be no apartheid Maori seats).
RE: Shape; Just another useless apartheid parasitical taxpayer funded waste of space.
Save us from would by tyrants that think they know best.
Those that do not support democracy, support power for their own opinions (today's opinions) above others. Those systems have been tried, they ended badly.
Helmut Modlik, that fine upstanding part 'Maori' who leads Te Rauparaha's tribe, Ngati Toa, which is now the landlord for most of the school site's around Wellington, all c/- of the largesse of a Treaty settlement - all on lease terms that investors would have fought over if they had been offered to the public at large. And if any of you think for a nano-second he represents the best interests of all New Zealanders. then you are as deluded as our erstwhile Government.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.