Of course, this should never have got to where it has.
The High Court judge said the decision does not mean they can't summon people in future. That is the bad news. He also said it doesn’t diminish the tribunals standing.
That I am afraid, in my eyes, is wrong as well.
They tried it on and they lost. They overreached and in overreaching they were portraying themselves as more important than they actually are.
They forgot that at the end of the day two critical things are in play. The first is they don’t actually have the power to tell people what to do when it comes to their decisions.
The second is the Government is the Government and if they have the numbers, they are in fact the highest court in the land.
If the Government of the day want to remove a clause in the workings of a department they can.
As a tribunal, they can ask some questions if they want to. But they don't have the power, or the right, to demand stuff or boss people around, especially when it comes to a minister.
This is where the activism comes in. One can surely ask if what you come up with is nothing more than an observation or an opinion, why does the taxpayer continue to fund it?
How many lawyers for how many hours gather and pontificate to satisfy the whims of the agitators, who use the tribunal as a mechanism to make noise and stir trouble?
A Government must be allowed to govern.
It's also important to remember the name - tribunal. It's not the Waitangi Court, Supreme, High or district court. It is just a tribunal.
Crown Law, in challenging the summons, have clearly seen the overreach and as such did the right thing to look to hose it down.
Given the activism we are increasingly seeing in courts, especially the Supreme Court, this case might have been used as a bit of a test case to put the Government under pressure.
We can be grateful that didn’t happen. Karen Chhour can get on with her job.
The Waitangi Tribunal can hopefully read the judgement, take on board the intent and pull their head in.
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings - where this article was sourced.
They forgot that at the end of the day two critical things are in play. The first is they don’t actually have the power to tell people what to do when it comes to their decisions.
The second is the Government is the Government and if they have the numbers, they are in fact the highest court in the land.
If the Government of the day want to remove a clause in the workings of a department they can.
As a tribunal, they can ask some questions if they want to. But they don't have the power, or the right, to demand stuff or boss people around, especially when it comes to a minister.
This is where the activism comes in. One can surely ask if what you come up with is nothing more than an observation or an opinion, why does the taxpayer continue to fund it?
How many lawyers for how many hours gather and pontificate to satisfy the whims of the agitators, who use the tribunal as a mechanism to make noise and stir trouble?
A Government must be allowed to govern.
It's also important to remember the name - tribunal. It's not the Waitangi Court, Supreme, High or district court. It is just a tribunal.
Crown Law, in challenging the summons, have clearly seen the overreach and as such did the right thing to look to hose it down.
Given the activism we are increasingly seeing in courts, especially the Supreme Court, this case might have been used as a bit of a test case to put the Government under pressure.
We can be grateful that didn’t happen. Karen Chhour can get on with her job.
The Waitangi Tribunal can hopefully read the judgement, take on board the intent and pull their head in.
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings - where this article was sourced.
4 comments:
The WT have not read the room at all.
They activistically do beleive they are the controllers and if they challenge this to the Supreme Court, which appears they will then, and only then if the SC does not send a very, very clear and very specific GTFO the WT will continue to chisel away at democracy as they have done so for nearly 50 years.
It is well past time the parasites in the WT get the serve they deserve and the country can rid itself of the contrived division and victim scenario that the WT quite literally makes up to suit whichever day of the week it is.
Agree Anna. Minister Chhour has the high ground on this serious issue, and the fact that the Waitangi Tribunal has tried to block her efforts to protect our most unfortunate of children shows us where its priorities lie.
That the WT can even imagine that culturally-based child abuse is in any way acceptable is beyond me.
As it stands, WT appears to be either deranged, or sick. The problem is, we haven't heard the last from these people.
Very true Mike.
However, if the SC rules in favor of the WT, then all is lost.
Maori will challenge every piece of proposed legislation and subpoena anyone connected with it.
It is obvious the WT is long past its usefulness.
Mike, I have a feeling that the WT is only just starting. This was a stepping stone and they will now be bold. This was a minor setback for them and a test of the water. The ruling should have put them firmly in their place, but it didn't. Bummer.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.