The essence of the letter is this:
Our position…is that Māori
wards and constituencies should be treated like all other wards and that
decisions should be made at the council level. Polls aren’t required on any
other wards or constituencies, and requiring them will add increased costs to
councils.
Polls are not required where ward boundaries are changed,
created or consolidated, because it does not change the electoral system.
That petition right was first introduced in 2001 when STV was introduced as an alternative to FPP for the 2004 and subsequent local body elections. That petition right remains today.
When Māori reserved seats on local authorities were
permitted in an amendment to the Local Electoral Act in 2002, the Clark Labour Government
extended the petition right to include Māori wards, because it introduced the
Māori electoral roll into the local electoral system.
There is a very good reason why the binding petition right should apply whenever councillors change the electoral system. It’s because they have a vested interest in the way they are elected! Democratic fairness dictates that electors should have the final say about how their representatives are elected.
Their letter goes on to say:
We are disappointed this is in contrast with the commitments the Government made during the election campaign to empower local government to make decisions about its own communities.
It is absurd for these elected leaders to say the coalition government campaigned to empower local councillors. The narrative around local democracy has been about encouraging greater engagement with local communities, not less. For these 52 luminaries to see no wrong in their proposal displays an incredible arrogance and delusional lack of understanding about their role as community representatives.
Reinstating the petition right strengthens local democracy.
But it should go further. The binding petition right
should be extended to become a general right applying to any resolution passed by a local authority. Only then will local councillors appreciate that they are representatives.
A counterargument to a general petition right is that this may prompt too many petitions
on matters of little importance and impose unnecessary costs on councils - ratepayers.
From experience, I assure detractors that achieving the threshold support of 5% of registered electors in the form required is no easy task, especially when the voter turnout in local elections is typically less than 50%. It requires a well-resourced and organised team and the issue must be of great public interest.
See their letter Here >>>
The signatories are:
Bay of Plenty
Regional Council |
Chair Doug
Leeder |
Central
Hawke’s Bay District Council |
Mayor Alex
Walker |
Central Otago
District Council |
Mayor Tim
Cadogan |
Chatham
Islands Council |
Mayor Monique
Croon |
Clutha
District Council |
Mayor Bryan
Cadogan |
Dunedin City Council |
Mayor Jules
Radich |
Environment
Canterbury |
Acting Chair
Craig Pauling |
Environment
Southland |
Chair Nicol
Horrell |
Far North
District Council |
Mayor Moko
Tepania |
Gisborne
District Council |
Mayor Rehette
Stoltz |
Gore District
Council |
Mayor Ben
Bell |
Greater
Wellington Regional Council |
Chair Daran
Ponter |
Hastings
District Council |
Mayor Sandra
Hazlehurst |
Hauraki
District Council |
Mayor Toby
Adams |
Hawke’s Bay
Regional Council |
Chair Hinewai
Ormsby |
Horizons
Regional Council |
Chair Rachel
Keedwell |
Horowhenua
District Council |
Mayor Bernie
Wanden |
Hutt City
Council |
Mayor Campbell Barry |
Kāpiti Coast
District Council |
Mayor Janet
Holborow |
Kawerau
District Council |
Mayor Faylene
Tunui |
Mackenzie
District Council |
Mayor Anne
Munro |
Marlborough
District Council |
Mayor Nadine
Taylor |
Masterton
District Council |
Mayor Gary
Caffell |
Mayor Janet
Holborow |
Mayor Neil
Holdom |
Napier City
Council |
Mayor Kirsten
Wise |
New Plymouth
District Council |
Mayor Neil
Holdom |
Northland
Regional Council |
Chair Geoff
Crawford |
Ōpōtiki
District Council |
Mayor David
Moore |
Ōtorohanga
District Council |
Mayor Max
Baxter |
Palmerston
North City Council |
Mayor Grant
Smith |
Porirua City
Council |
Mayor Anita
Baker |
Rangitīkei
District Council |
Mayor Andy
Watson |
Ruapehu
District Council |
Mayor Weston
Kirton |
Selwyn
District Council |
Mayor Sam Broughton |
South
Taranaki District Council |
Mayor Phil
Nixon |
South Waikato
District Council |
Mayor Gary
Petley |
South
Wairarapa District Council |
Mayor Martin Connelly |
Southland
District Council |
Mayor Rob
Scott |
Stratford
District Council |
Mayor Neil
Volzke |
Taranaki
Regional Council |
Chair
Charlotte Littlewood |
Tararua
District Council |
Mayor Tracey
Collis |
Tasman
District Council |
Mayor Tim
King |
Taupō District
Council |
Mayor David
Trewavas |
Te Maruata
Rōpū Whakahaere |
Cr Toni
Boynton & Cr Iaean Cranwell |
Thames-Coromandel
District Council |
Mayor Len
Salt |
Upper Hutt
City Council |
Mayor Wayne
Guppy |
Waikato
District Council |
Mayor Jacqui
Church |
Waikato
Regional Council |
Chair Pamela
Storey |
Waipā
District Council |
Mayor Susan
O’Regan |
Wairoa
District Council |
Mayor Craig
Little |
Waitaki
District Council |
Mayor Gary
Kircher |
Wellington
City Council |
Mayor Tory
Whanau |
Whakatāne
District Council |
Mayor Dr Victor
Luca |
Whanganui
District Council |
Mayor Andrew
Tripe |
13 comments:
“We urge the Government to reconsider its position and leave it to local councils to make decisions about appropriate representation arrangements IN PARTNERSHIP with Iwi and their communities”.
So Broughton and Barry are the ‘Brown Shirts’ for the State’s policy and enforcer arm masquerading as LGNZ?
What threats were conveyed to get the other “independent” mayors to sign off on keeping this forced Co-Governance wonderfulness going, or are they all just indoctrinated woke leftest retards?
The APARTHEID LGNZ along with the APARTHEID Waitangi Tribunal need to be shut down ASAP.
Broughton is the mayor of Selwyn DC and the most unpopular mayor in the history of the district. A young fellow with very little life experience, but unfortunately it is a pretty thankless job and nobody worth their weight is prepared to stand against him.
Why is it that some people think democracy is fluid for them when it suits them?
These Mayors need to take a very long hard look at their respective selves and ask if their individual voting right was dismissed at the whim of another where then would they then stand?
One vote, one person, one nation. New Zealand is for New Zealanders not the whim of someones ideology. We had 6 years of that and look where we are today.....
Could there be a better reason to put commissioners in to put all these Councils to rights?
Why are these 50 Councils so scared of a poll?
I suggest it is because they know full well that the legislation will improve democratic representation, and they will be held more, far more, accountable to their ratepayers and electors.
There has been something very strange going on in LGNZ ever since the last government massively increased their annual budget. Some racist fat cats there perhaps driving this. Time for a clean-up there too!
Local govt is no different from central govt in reality - one person, one vote, govern on behalf of your electorate without prejudice.
It seems simple enough, yet...without prejudice might be tricky for some.
They fair democracy. They demand the right to make community decisions, but reject the right of the community to make decisions.
New Plymouth is a classic case of a woke Mayer, who cares little about the wishes of the people in his community. A poll has already been carried out in the New Plymouth council district, with 80% demanding democracy; i.e, one person one vote. Now with no consultation, he is requesting special privilege's for mixed race descendants of just one ethnic group.
Meanwhile those who have worked and achieved something, are given a 20% increase in their Rates {wealth tax} bill.
Of those that signed, aren't they a bunch of truly woke, gutless wa....s!
They have every similarity to the 2,000-odd likewise gutless and ignorant academics who signed the letter in opposition to the esteemed "Listener 7" - who had the audacity to challenge matauranga Maori's incorporation in the science curriculum.
These Mayors (and Chairs) do need to sit back on their well-padded derrieres and contemplate their navels and determine what they are really supporting here.
Like truth, democracy will out (eventually), and if they really think what they propose is 'the will of the people', they are deluded. One can only hope, they reap what they sow.
It really surprises me that these ELECTED representatives of their local communities haven;'t read the room - the election showed clearly that the majority had decided that Labour's ideology had put NZ in the worst position it has been in its history, socially, economically, and politically. NZ has never been this divided and indebted.
Of real concern is that these people could end up on the four person panels that assess fast track applications. That's why I objected to that part of the Fast Track Bill - the panel must have one iwi representative (racist) and one council (socialist) member.
Democracy is under attack and MUST revert to 'one person, one vote'.
One person one vote, how can you change this and be deluded enough to believe Democracy stands.
We had a vote in Kapiti and they lost with 60% declining Maori wards. The council then had the audacity to say that they knew better and they were doing this for the Rangatahi as they had also been asked. These 'Rangatahi" are not old enough to vote!!! Disgusting
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.