Not long after I began treatment in 2015 for an aggressive leukaemia, I was phoned by a representative of the Cancer Society. A hospital oncology staffer had strongly recommended I give the organisation my name and contact details so I did.
I had become aware — as most cancer sufferers do — that hospital doctors and nurses are highly dedicated, capable and sympathetic to patients’ needs but their primary focus is to keep you alive and return you to good health if possible. They work under immense pressure and don’t have much time to hold your hand if you’re not coping with your diagnosis or the rigours of treatment. They certainly don’t have the time to help you deal with practical concerns such as how you might get to and from hospital.
That’s where the Cancer Society steps in. The person who rang me explained I could get free transport to appointments via its network of volunteer drivers and outlined the financial help available through government agencies if I couldn’t work. She also told me about other services the society offers, including home visits by specialised cancer nurses, free counselling and a helpline for advice and support.
It is a registered charity funded largely by bequests, donations and sponsorships, and it depends on an army of volunteers (including more than 5000 drivers across New Zealand). Personally, I have never met a cancer patient who hasn’t praised the society’s work but there are always a few dissenting voices among those whom charitable enterprises serve.
Reactions to a cancer diagnosis can include anger, resentment, panic attacks and a crippling fear of going anywhere near a hospital — emotions which unfortunately may be expressed sometimes in criticism and hostility towards those doing their best to help. Most patients will readily cut busy doctors, nurses and volunteers some slack and if they happen to be curt after a gruelling shift or a little insensitive to an overly demanding patient, who would blame them? However, a small minority won’t excuse any oversight, error or tetchiness by medical staff or carers. They will take every inconvenience or mistake very personally, and will complain about it loudly. Sometimes their complaints find their way into the media, even when they would seem to most people to be an overreaction or plainly vexatious.
Last week, the NZ Herald republished a story from Te Ao Māori News that recounted how a young-ish Māori woman had felt that staff at the Cancer Society’s Domain Lodge had “discriminated” against her during her stay there and that they had shown a lack of cultural competency.
The Domain Lodge is a purpose-built facility a short stroll from Auckland Hospital that offers accommodation for patients who have to travel from out of town for cancer treatment. It is a modern, well-maintained building with a shared kitchen where patients can cook their own meals. It has expert cancer nurses on hand, who are in close contact with the staff at the hospital treatment centres, and there are free counselling services.
The woman, Heeni Hoterene — a Northland advocate for traditional rongoā medicine and maramataka that incorporates the healing power of the moon — was apparently asked to vacate her room at 10am “because all the rooms were booked out”. She was told that she could, if she wanted, stay in the building and sit in the living area until another room was ready for her at 2pm.
The terms and conditions make it clear that “Domain Lodge functions like a motel. It is not a health-care facility and is unsuitable for people who require a high level of care.” Nevertheless, Hoterene complained to Te Ao Māori News that she objected to having to vacate her room and that she didn’t want to feel exposed in a public area after receiving radiation treatment.
She said: “Everyone else gets to recover privately in their room. Why am I the one that’s being moved out of my room?” She alleged it was because she was Māori, had a moko kauae and was younger than all the other guests.
The journalist who repeated her allegations did not critically examine them; it seemed sufficient to simply assert them. And that, perhaps, should not be surprising given the mainstream media has been on a mission for years now to interpret any adverse statistics in Māori health or perceived errors in diagnosis and treatment as a direct result of institutional racism.
Their aim can be best achieved, of course, by a very selective presentation of the facts. Certainly Hoterene’s complaints might have been viewed differently if the article had mentioned that she had stayed at The Lodge for five days — and that accommodation for cancer patients is provided free of charge.
The story in Te Ao Māori News and the Herald didn’t mention that many patients are able to continue to work while they are undergoing radiotherapy. Indeed, as Hoterene told her 55,000 Facebook followers in a video clip last Friday, she expected to be well enough after her final radiation session that morning to be driven the three hours to her home in Northland. In that context, a few hours snoozing in the lobby doesn’t seem like a particular hardship.
She had also been well enough to go out dining and dancing (“kanikani”) on K’ Rd, a kilometre or so from The Lodge, the previous evening.
Of course, it’s always possible it was a mistake for the lodge staff to have asked her to vacate her room. Perhaps she was more fragile and fatigued than she appeared. Given she was younger than the other patients, perhaps she was mistakenly assessed as being more resilient. But why would media organisations so credulously repeat accusations of cultural insensitivity and discrimination as the reason she had to temporarily vacate her room?
The answer, of course, is obvious. Without the allegation of “discrimination” — meaning racism — there would have been no story. There is nothing remarkable about a patient being inconvenienced. Hospitals are forced to juggle patients and beds constantly. Just last week, Auckland Hospital Maternity Services warned expectant mothers they may be discharged three to four hours after giving birth. Now that’s a story.
When I collapsed after a day-long infusion at North Shore Hospital as I was leaving the building one winter’s evening I was told bluntly the hospital was full and there was no bed available. But thanks to a very kind nurse who stayed behind after the end of her shift to help me, I was eventually given a bed for the night in a consultants’ room which wasn’t normally available to patients. But it was made very clear I had to leave by 7am.
I could barely stand upright in the morning but I managed to vacate the room as requested and sat slumped in a chair in the foyer until someone arrived to drive me home. No journalist would have thought my experience was a story worth reporting, and nor should they have.
Cancer Society spokesperson Michelle Gundersen-Reid issued the obligatory public apology to Hoterene: “The team and I are sorry that this week we haven’t maintained our usual high standard of support as we had to shuffle a resident between rooms so we could fit as many people in as possible.
“As soon as we became aware of the issue, we booked a meeting in with the impacted person. Representatives from our board and senior management team met her yesterday to apologise directly and discuss what happened, so we can learn from this experience.”
It is obvious that once an organisation is accused of “cultural” failings or discrimination, it is pointless to try to explain its actions or defend itself. It will only invite more opprobrium — which the race-hustling mainstream media will gleefully amplify. The society’s only option was to apologise profusely.
Hoterene claimed the senior managers she met lacked cultural competency. “Staff are still ignorant of how to interact with Māori,” she said. “How do we educate them on the best way to care for Māori within these places?”
The news story reported that when Hoterene had told staff, “Oh, my whānau are coming to stay,” one had replied, “There is a rule here that not a lot of whānau can stay.” Hoterene responded with: “Who are you to talk to me like that?”
Her Facebook video clips expanded on her view that the lodge’s policy mandating patients can have only one supporter stay with them was culturally inappropriate. Māori, she said, never turn up in “ones”.
She reckoned 17 members of her whānau in two vans had intended to come to see her and asked: “Where do I go to host them?... Where’s the marae room?”
If Hoterene’s expectations about how many whānau members the lodge should welcome had made their way into Te Ao Māori News or the Herald story — or in a follow-up to the original piece — readers would have been much better equipped to judge the merits of her complaint about cultural insensitivity.
The chances of that happening, however, are as remote as the media reporting the assessment on May 31 by a Māori family from Opononi who were full of praise for the lodge and their care. A whānau member posted on Facebook: “Beautiful stay at the Domain Lodge... Thank you so much to the surgeons, Dr Kei, Dr Lund, Dr Prasaad, nurses Vanessa, Lisa, Savita, SeKumar, Anna, Lynn, Sunita, Nesse. So grateful that we have top surgeons & staff at Cardiology Wards 42 & 48. Thank you for your love and care. Love & blessings xx.”
The names of the surgeons and nurses mentioned are indicative of just what a vast melting pot our health system has become. To claim that such dedicated staff representing a wide range of ethnicities are somehow particularly prejudiced against Māori not only strains credulity but is widely seen as offensive.
Nevertheless, the mainstream media shows no signs of abandoning its mission to convince the public of New Zealand’s deep-seated racism wherever possible, no matter how flimsy the evidence. As one wag put it: “The demand from journalists for stories about racism vastly exceeds the supply.”
Graham Adams is an Auckland-based freelance editor, journalist and columnist. This article was originally published by ThePlatform.kiwi and is published here with kind permission.
It is a registered charity funded largely by bequests, donations and sponsorships, and it depends on an army of volunteers (including more than 5000 drivers across New Zealand). Personally, I have never met a cancer patient who hasn’t praised the society’s work but there are always a few dissenting voices among those whom charitable enterprises serve.
Reactions to a cancer diagnosis can include anger, resentment, panic attacks and a crippling fear of going anywhere near a hospital — emotions which unfortunately may be expressed sometimes in criticism and hostility towards those doing their best to help. Most patients will readily cut busy doctors, nurses and volunteers some slack and if they happen to be curt after a gruelling shift or a little insensitive to an overly demanding patient, who would blame them? However, a small minority won’t excuse any oversight, error or tetchiness by medical staff or carers. They will take every inconvenience or mistake very personally, and will complain about it loudly. Sometimes their complaints find their way into the media, even when they would seem to most people to be an overreaction or plainly vexatious.
Last week, the NZ Herald republished a story from Te Ao Māori News that recounted how a young-ish Māori woman had felt that staff at the Cancer Society’s Domain Lodge had “discriminated” against her during her stay there and that they had shown a lack of cultural competency.
The Domain Lodge is a purpose-built facility a short stroll from Auckland Hospital that offers accommodation for patients who have to travel from out of town for cancer treatment. It is a modern, well-maintained building with a shared kitchen where patients can cook their own meals. It has expert cancer nurses on hand, who are in close contact with the staff at the hospital treatment centres, and there are free counselling services.
The woman, Heeni Hoterene — a Northland advocate for traditional rongoā medicine and maramataka that incorporates the healing power of the moon — was apparently asked to vacate her room at 10am “because all the rooms were booked out”. She was told that she could, if she wanted, stay in the building and sit in the living area until another room was ready for her at 2pm.
The terms and conditions make it clear that “Domain Lodge functions like a motel. It is not a health-care facility and is unsuitable for people who require a high level of care.” Nevertheless, Hoterene complained to Te Ao Māori News that she objected to having to vacate her room and that she didn’t want to feel exposed in a public area after receiving radiation treatment.
She said: “Everyone else gets to recover privately in their room. Why am I the one that’s being moved out of my room?” She alleged it was because she was Māori, had a moko kauae and was younger than all the other guests.
The journalist who repeated her allegations did not critically examine them; it seemed sufficient to simply assert them. And that, perhaps, should not be surprising given the mainstream media has been on a mission for years now to interpret any adverse statistics in Māori health or perceived errors in diagnosis and treatment as a direct result of institutional racism.
Their aim can be best achieved, of course, by a very selective presentation of the facts. Certainly Hoterene’s complaints might have been viewed differently if the article had mentioned that she had stayed at The Lodge for five days — and that accommodation for cancer patients is provided free of charge.
The story in Te Ao Māori News and the Herald didn’t mention that many patients are able to continue to work while they are undergoing radiotherapy. Indeed, as Hoterene told her 55,000 Facebook followers in a video clip last Friday, she expected to be well enough after her final radiation session that morning to be driven the three hours to her home in Northland. In that context, a few hours snoozing in the lobby doesn’t seem like a particular hardship.
She had also been well enough to go out dining and dancing (“kanikani”) on K’ Rd, a kilometre or so from The Lodge, the previous evening.
Of course, it’s always possible it was a mistake for the lodge staff to have asked her to vacate her room. Perhaps she was more fragile and fatigued than she appeared. Given she was younger than the other patients, perhaps she was mistakenly assessed as being more resilient. But why would media organisations so credulously repeat accusations of cultural insensitivity and discrimination as the reason she had to temporarily vacate her room?
The answer, of course, is obvious. Without the allegation of “discrimination” — meaning racism — there would have been no story. There is nothing remarkable about a patient being inconvenienced. Hospitals are forced to juggle patients and beds constantly. Just last week, Auckland Hospital Maternity Services warned expectant mothers they may be discharged three to four hours after giving birth. Now that’s a story.
When I collapsed after a day-long infusion at North Shore Hospital as I was leaving the building one winter’s evening I was told bluntly the hospital was full and there was no bed available. But thanks to a very kind nurse who stayed behind after the end of her shift to help me, I was eventually given a bed for the night in a consultants’ room which wasn’t normally available to patients. But it was made very clear I had to leave by 7am.
I could barely stand upright in the morning but I managed to vacate the room as requested and sat slumped in a chair in the foyer until someone arrived to drive me home. No journalist would have thought my experience was a story worth reporting, and nor should they have.
Cancer Society spokesperson Michelle Gundersen-Reid issued the obligatory public apology to Hoterene: “The team and I are sorry that this week we haven’t maintained our usual high standard of support as we had to shuffle a resident between rooms so we could fit as many people in as possible.
“As soon as we became aware of the issue, we booked a meeting in with the impacted person. Representatives from our board and senior management team met her yesterday to apologise directly and discuss what happened, so we can learn from this experience.”
It is obvious that once an organisation is accused of “cultural” failings or discrimination, it is pointless to try to explain its actions or defend itself. It will only invite more opprobrium — which the race-hustling mainstream media will gleefully amplify. The society’s only option was to apologise profusely.
Hoterene claimed the senior managers she met lacked cultural competency. “Staff are still ignorant of how to interact with Māori,” she said. “How do we educate them on the best way to care for Māori within these places?”
The news story reported that when Hoterene had told staff, “Oh, my whānau are coming to stay,” one had replied, “There is a rule here that not a lot of whānau can stay.” Hoterene responded with: “Who are you to talk to me like that?”
Her Facebook video clips expanded on her view that the lodge’s policy mandating patients can have only one supporter stay with them was culturally inappropriate. Māori, she said, never turn up in “ones”.
She reckoned 17 members of her whānau in two vans had intended to come to see her and asked: “Where do I go to host them?... Where’s the marae room?”
If Hoterene’s expectations about how many whānau members the lodge should welcome had made their way into Te Ao Māori News or the Herald story — or in a follow-up to the original piece — readers would have been much better equipped to judge the merits of her complaint about cultural insensitivity.
The chances of that happening, however, are as remote as the media reporting the assessment on May 31 by a Māori family from Opononi who were full of praise for the lodge and their care. A whānau member posted on Facebook: “Beautiful stay at the Domain Lodge... Thank you so much to the surgeons, Dr Kei, Dr Lund, Dr Prasaad, nurses Vanessa, Lisa, Savita, SeKumar, Anna, Lynn, Sunita, Nesse. So grateful that we have top surgeons & staff at Cardiology Wards 42 & 48. Thank you for your love and care. Love & blessings xx.”
The names of the surgeons and nurses mentioned are indicative of just what a vast melting pot our health system has become. To claim that such dedicated staff representing a wide range of ethnicities are somehow particularly prejudiced against Māori not only strains credulity but is widely seen as offensive.
Nevertheless, the mainstream media shows no signs of abandoning its mission to convince the public of New Zealand’s deep-seated racism wherever possible, no matter how flimsy the evidence. As one wag put it: “The demand from journalists for stories about racism vastly exceeds the supply.”
Graham Adams is an Auckland-based freelance editor, journalist and columnist. This article was originally published by ThePlatform.kiwi and is published here with kind permission.
16 comments:
Frankly this woman should have been counselled on her extraordinary lack of sensitivity for others and complete ingratitude towards those taking care of her.
If she wants the whanau round she can go home. If I were staying at the facility I sure as eggs wouldn't want extraneous people round making noise and consuming the peace and quiet and other resources.
As a cancer patient myself (Stage 4 and in remission only because of an allogenic stem-cell transplant at Wellington Hospital), I am one of those volunteers for the Cancer Society. On Mondays I talk to cancer patients in Ward 5 of the same hospital, and quite a few of those to whom I have talked recently have already departed this world. All of them and their families appreciate the care and concern of the volunteers who, naturally enough, are not paid.
I have seen no evidence whatsoever of racism or bias in either the Cancer Society's attitudes or delivery. Everone is treated equally as a human being and the Society deserves high praise.
David Alexander Lillis
I had a conversation with some doctors last year and they told me they had contacted a Marae about using their facility to run a health programme for local Maori. The Marae representatives were happy as long as the doctors cleaned the Marae for a month prior. The doctors did not proceed.
Perhaps, due to her being an advocate of traditional rongoā medicine and maramataka that incorporates the healing power of the moon, she'd been up all night basking in the moonlight and was pissed off at not being able to doze during the day in her private room.
Thank you for this very moving story, Graham, about an arrogant undeserving person - many will blush on her behalf. As you imply, she, not a deep thinker by nature, has been led to behave in this appalling way by an irresponsible news medium which encourages her to think her race matters.
As for you and all the good people in the healing professions and the Cancer Society, bless you and keep you, I deeply pray.
As a fellow luekaemia patient who spent some days in ICU, many more on a ward, and then months of follow up chemotherapy, I can't praise our public hospital staff, the Cancer Society and the volunteers enough. The staff were of multiple ethnicities, but at no time did I experience racism, and nor for that matter has my wife who, as a nurse, has worked more than 30 years in the public system and nearly a decade in private practice.
This systemic racism claim is a beat-up, although it did progress down that track in more recent years under Labour's divided Maori health system, which was patently racist.
The woman mentioned appears to be little other than an ingrate, and I for one would be delighted if she would leave the public system to those who appreciate it more and are grateful for their efforts under very difficult circumstances. After all, she has traditional rongoa and maramataka to call upon, and if they can’t assist with her cancer, then perhaps she could always seek out the assistance of a tohanga?
The NZ Herald should be ashamed of itself for regurgitating such codswallop.
And people like Ms Hoterene, should learn to show far more humility and gratitude to those that are only trying to do their best with limited resources and an ever increasing need.
Perhaps she was just bitter because her traditional rongoā medicine and maramataka had failed her so badly. That she had to rely on some dirty colonialist's medicine would have made her rather distraught.
A few montns ago, after decades of subscribing, I gave up the Herald. A rep recently phoned me with a discount offer and asked why I could not be lured. Told him it was insufficently objective.
A friend worked as a nurse. The vsiting parties for maori were seen as a trial with hangers on roaming the ward, annoying others, hogging all chairs, sitting on beds etc
My capacity to feel any kind of sympathy for our brown brothers and sisters is vanishing each time l read any MSM story concerning these selfish narcissists.
In fact it well due they were put in their place.
There certainly is massive racism occurring in this country. But not by who the media are claiming are the perpetrator. The racist are heeni hatrere and the nutters like her. Karma will sort her out.
Who will sort these people out?
These people are the new ruling class, the new status quo. They are the voice of NZ championing causes of racism, diversity sensitivity, supported by the media and underwritten by the waitangi tribunal. These two institutions now rule NZ. Anything and anyone else is subservient.
The Herald is fulfilling its obligations under the terms of their PIJF agreement to promote all things Maori, otherwise they risk having their funding pulled.
Their editors feel no shame.
And that is why this story about this "entitled" Maori woman is published in the pages of the Herald and exactly why Graham's story would never be published in the Herald or anywhere else in the MSM.
Is this Maori entitlement generated by Ardern's commitment to He Puapua, the seperate Maori Health system, priority surgery given to Maori ?
Why does everyone heading such organizations have to grovel and apologize on bended knees ?
When are they going to learn that every apology is seen as another win by Maori, another precedent established?
Where else in the world would such behavior be tolerated, not seen for being so blatently racist, and accepted by people who are bullied into making such apologies ?
Thank you Graham for bringing this intolerable behavior to the attention of those who are not fully indoctrinated and read Breaking Views.
Peter, the relentless demonising of the health system as racist over the past six years in my view was part of the push by the Ardern-Hipkins government to establish a "need" for the setting-up of a standalone Maori Health Authority.
And the Labour government's commitment to co-governance meant it had to be ranked equally with NZ Health (initially, at least, it had the power of veto over the whole country's health programmes). So the 20 DHBs had to go simply to enable a co-governance structure of equals.
The mainstream media's willingness to promote the Treaty as a "partnership" in exchange for $55m meant its journalists pushed the "racism" angle at every opportunity. And they're still doing it, where they can.
A much needed antidote to the nonsense we are fed daily by the MSM. Graham Adams is a wonderful gadfly to those 'journalists' whose only source of pride seems to be in stoking the need of the left wingers to feel good about themselves, rather than thinking for themselves.
The NZ system is racist but it is discriminating towards every other race aka the controversial 2021 decision by the government drug-buying agency Pharmac to prioritise Māori and Pacific patients in its funding of diabetes. Other races were not able to receive the new drugs because Pharmac only wanted to pay fro Maori and Pacific Island diabetes patients. The discrimination continued with Maori then getting priority for health waiting lists. Being equal is now not enough - the demands from a vocal and well funded minority are that Maori and Pacific Islanders have their own funding, own health system but also manage to get priority for the public health system too. This ignores lifestyle which is the biggest factors in higher health needs aka obesity and diabetes. If government wanted to save lives a campaign to eat better food, lay off drugs and alcohol and exercise for Maori and Pacific and everyone else would be money better spent.
Whanau Ora already receives additional funding aka hundreds of millions in money for Maori health for decades as well as Maori being able to draw on the public health system so Maori already get more help than the general public. Now charities have to discriminate against other patients and more money put aside for extra benefits for Maori health and even then it is not good enough.
Free drivers paid for by our taxes to ferry her around (weird that the visitors couldn't bring her) So tired of it. This attitude that nothing is ever enough is destroying the public health system and ACC and Pharmac with more and more demands aka now the public system as well as Whanau funds traditional rongoā medicine and maramataka that incorporates the healing power of the moon - at the same time they cut real medicine to everyone else. I have no problem with cultural medicene as long as it is funded by the funding already set aside for it or privately raised, not constantly expecting the public health system to provide more and more funding. It is unsustainable.
If you look at the Cook Island Maori the closest relations to NZ Maori they die 8 years before NZ Maori - therefore NZ is not discriminating against NZ Maori, colonialisation has helped the NZ Maori access medicine and lifestyle that extends their life far beyond what a traditional lifestyle affords for Cook Island Maori.
Trace maori and others who go through life forever searching for discrimination will invariably think they have found it. A sure way to bring it on is to wear facial disfigurement. It announces to others that they will be treated with contempt so invites the same.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.