Recent attacks on Karen Chhour, and her understandable reaction to these attacks, have received some media attention in the past week, but not nearly enough.
Ms Chhour's outpouring of emotion tells a story a thousand words could not tell.
They tell a story of tribalism at its most raw and most ugly. Her treatment is an object lesson of what happens when race becomes the ultimate defining principle.
The response of the left to the impact of their vicious, vacuous, and unrelenting attack on Ms Chhour's character and identity speaks volumes. In deference to the narcissism that has become their defining characteristic, the Maori Party and the Green Party have shown neither empathy nor remorse. This is the price they are willing to exact in pursuit of their singular dogma, this is tribalism doing exactly what it does.
The Labour Party, careful not to offend the ideologues in their own party, and those of their coalition partners in waiting, made a brief and transitory concession to decency, followed swiftly by a swipe at Ms Chhour's competency.
And in the midst of all this the mainstream media remained largely on the sideline.
New Zealand was once a country that generally acted as if the rights, feelings, and reputations of individuals mattered, where a view could be safely expressed, even when it ran counter to other views, and when the outpouring of emotion, such as that elicited by Ms Chhour, would draw the sympathy of most, or at least of some.
Not so now it seems.
But Ms Chhour won a lot of fans last week. She became the face of true oppression. She became the personification of those who refuse to surrender to the commodification of dogma and group think, regardless of the price, who insist on their right to form a viewpoint independent of the views of others, who deny the illusion of singular causality, and the primacy of dogma ... and the ignorance and blindness that follow in its wake.
People like Ms Chhour will not be bullied because they know what bullies can do, they have experienced it first hand.
Bill 7AA is worth debating. Identity is important. Culture is important. But so too is the right of a child to be safe, to be cared for, to be encouraged, and to be truly loved.
While ethnicity and family should be considerations when placing children in care, never at the expense of their safety, and of their long term interests ... and never race above all other things.
I personally know of children who have been placed in multiple whanau homes where the patterns of abuse continued unabated.
Ms Chhour is right to take a wider lens on issues of placement. Ms Chhour is right to put the wellbeing of children ahead of a policy which makes them an unwitting sacrifice in service of ideological purity.
Most of us long ago saw that those most loudly yelling oppression had become the oppressors themselves. Their treatment of Ms Chhour made this clear for all to see.
Our parliament needs more
people like Ms Chhour. She stands head and shoulder above those whose
attack on her integrity (and identity) mark them not only as a danger to
democracy but to reason itself.
Caleb Anderson, a graduate history, economics, psychotherapy and theology, has been an educator for over thirty years, twenty as a school principal.
12 comments:
This instagram example of bullying by the co-leader of Te Pati Maori is scarcely believable.
That someone can be so petty and nasty speaks more of the character of Debbie Ngarewa-Packer than it does of Karen Chhour.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350364853/fragility-real-te-pati-maori-reacts-act-mp-karen-chhour-crying-over-personal
Go Ms Chhour!
The ethnocentric polarisation of New Zealanders finds its entry point in the Labour Party’s Maori Affairs Amendment Act 1974.
Before the Act was passed, the legal definition of ‘Maori” was by blood quantum: “A person of the Maori race of New Zealand or a half-caste descendant thereof.”
After panicked complaints from its Maori MPs that soon nobody would be able to prove eligibility for the Maori Electoral Roll, Labour changed that definition to read: “A person of the Maori race of New Zealand or any descendant thereof.”
With the stroke of a pen, anyone with a fraction of Maori blood, such as the 1/16th Maori, Stephen [aka ‘Tipene’] O’Regan, could hang a big mutton bone around his neck and identify himself as ‘Maori.’
Some 50 years after the fact—regardless of brown skin and Polynesian features—the Māori blood quantum in anyone claiming today to be ‘Māori’ is even more negligible in determining that individual’s ethnic makeup.
Placing at risk kids with loving Pakeha families is far more logical in terms of meeting their majority cultural needs then shoehorning them into a minority ‘Māori’ ethnocentric identity.
Thank you for such an incisive piece. The Maori Party and Hipkins etal personify tribalism and all it's dark manifestations. And yet another disgraceful display by the MSM - Leech, O'Brien and cohorts.
Steve Ellis
When people resort to personal attacks it shows that they are incapable of reasoned argument about the policy so can only go for the person. We met Karen at an ACT election campaign meeting about a year ago and she impressed us as a person passionate about her job and determined to help those who have had a a bad start in life. I totally agree we need a lot more people like here in parliament preferably replacing the bottom feeders who are currently attaching her.
How can Gerry Brownlee not do something about this?
Thanks Ms Chhour for doing the correct sensible thing, trying to fix the radical extreme left wing ideology mess left by the Labour so called "government ".
Maori loath the likes of Chhour as they show up what maori can acheive when largely separataed from maori influence. Hugely reduces the likelihood of being eager particiapnts in the insurgency move. Hence the incessant clamour for of maori by maori
IT WOULD HELP IF PEOPLE SENT EMAILS OF PERSONAL SUPPORT OF MS CHHOUR IN HER QUEST TO PROTECT VULNERABLE CHILDREN:
karen.chhour@parliament.govt.nz
This whole silly nonsense of what constitutes being a Maori is just plainly ridiculous. I increasingly see what appear white women with mokos and white males with full face Maori tattoos. An example as to what or who is Maori is as follows, my wife's father is one quarter, therefore my wife is one eighth, our children are one sixteenth and my grandson is therefore one 32nd Maori. This same grandson has been contacted by his tribe who say because he is Maori he is eligible for a 20k scholarship to pay his uni fees. His kids one day , if he has any , being 1/64th maori will also warrent special treatment because they will be Maori. What a bloody joke.
Totally agree. Why anyone would want to see bashed children returned to the source of their misery is beyond me. Strength and honour to Minister Chhour.
In response to Anonymous at 3.30pm, 8/8. Last week I had a gt grandson born. He is 128th Māori. Madness! The law must change as within another 25 years the country will have run out of taxpayers.
My Gt Grandson, born last week is 128th Maori. Madness
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.