The government has agreed to set aside $216 million it may need to pay for tax cuts for heated tobacco products (HTPs).
When I first heard this figure it seemed illogical as HTPs are such a minuscule part of the market.
She also said she did not expect the cost to the government to be “anywhere close to what was modelled”, as the tax collected on HTPs was only $3.62 million in 2022 and $5.97 million in 2023.
So the actual value of the tax change is $3 million, not $216 million. Yet the average reader or listener would think it is $216 million. How is that figure achieved?
Well prepare for nonsensical advice from officials.
But Health Ministry officials warned the minister against liberalising the regulation of HTPs, prior to the excise tax cut.
“There is no evidence to support their use as a quit smoking tool,” officials wrote to Costello.
So they said that this won’t drive smokers from normal cigarettes to heated tobacco (which is less harmful).
The Cabinet paper said Health Ministry modelling suggested 7200 smokers could switch to HTPs over the next two years if encouraged by a cheaper price.
But here they say actually 7,200 smokers would switch to the less harmful HTPs.
So the $216 million figure is based on the scenario that the lower excise tax will actually lead to smokers switching to HTPs. So there would only be a loss of revenue if smokers switch to less harmful HTPs – which is the exact purpose of the trial!
So the official Ministry advice is that for policy purposes no smokers will switch to HTPs, but for fiscal purposes 7,200 smokers will switch to HTPs!
David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders.
1 comment:
This has all become confused.
Looking at the Cabinet paper itself, the $216M was a figure Cabinet had previously budgeted for as a contingency for a reduction in revenue. That relates to a four year period rather than a one year period.
The budget was based on advice from both Treasury and the Health Ministry of the possible drop in tax collected from all tobacco products (not only HTPs) over four years. There will be less tax derived from cigarettes because (hopefully) smokers will switch to HTPs, which is the point of the exercise. The Cabinet paper openly admits that the estimate is based on limited research and involves assumptions and a lot of uncertainty. It is based on what happened in Japan where vaping isn't legal.
It seems that the main problem is not so much the Ministry's advice but RNZ's sensational reporting which tries in make a story out of nothing to criticise the government. A lot of the RNZ article is about the fact that two employees of Phillip Morris used to be staff members of NZ First seven years ago.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.