Did the media not notice the letter? Or did they notice the letter and not think promoting a bipartisan approach was useful? Or had we given up, given last week's call fell apart the moment it got uttered publicly?
A 30-year plan, a new agency, and the first thing that happened was Chris Hipkins pooh-poohed it, citing the treatment they got on light rail and cycle bridges.
I think at least part of the lesson is that it's easy to call for a bipartisan approach, which is what the energy users are asking for.
Indeed offering a few starters for ten, which is what they do in their letter, isn't that hard either. It's the next bit where things fall apart.
Is it possible we have become a divided country?
We cite America and its blocked and broken system as the premier example of a country being unable to get anything done, but are we any different?
Last week it was infrastructure, this week it's energy. And what's the outcome?
When it comes to infrastructure you've got a party that cancelled roads and built cycleways and bus lanes, and the other party who cancelled the bike paths and will build the roads.
You've got a party that liked to pay for projects through debt vs a party that likes PPPs and congestion charging.
When it comes to the energy crisis one party that thought a $16b dollar lake was an answer and another that thinks gas should be looked for and coal burned.
The question, which is where a new agency or more cohesive approach would come in, is where is the middle ground?
Where is the commonality?
The trouble with this country, like America, is we come at it from not only two different sides, but with a very large gap to close and a long-held belief that we are right, and the other guys are out to lunch.
But unlike America, where you find moderate versions of Democrats and Republicans in both parties, here you are not allowed to think outside your party's mandates, far less actually vote against them.
So, the conclusion would appear the twain shall never meet, because we are black and white, and the answer isn't.
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings - where this article was sourced.
I think at least part of the lesson is that it's easy to call for a bipartisan approach, which is what the energy users are asking for.
Indeed offering a few starters for ten, which is what they do in their letter, isn't that hard either. It's the next bit where things fall apart.
Is it possible we have become a divided country?
We cite America and its blocked and broken system as the premier example of a country being unable to get anything done, but are we any different?
Last week it was infrastructure, this week it's energy. And what's the outcome?
When it comes to infrastructure you've got a party that cancelled roads and built cycleways and bus lanes, and the other party who cancelled the bike paths and will build the roads.
You've got a party that liked to pay for projects through debt vs a party that likes PPPs and congestion charging.
When it comes to the energy crisis one party that thought a $16b dollar lake was an answer and another that thinks gas should be looked for and coal burned.
The question, which is where a new agency or more cohesive approach would come in, is where is the middle ground?
Where is the commonality?
The trouble with this country, like America, is we come at it from not only two different sides, but with a very large gap to close and a long-held belief that we are right, and the other guys are out to lunch.
But unlike America, where you find moderate versions of Democrats and Republicans in both parties, here you are not allowed to think outside your party's mandates, far less actually vote against them.
So, the conclusion would appear the twain shall never meet, because we are black and white, and the answer isn't.
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings - where this article was sourced.
1 comment:
In an MMP electoral system the answer is obvious - no.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.