The decision has been hailed as a victory for free speech by the Free Speech Union.
Jonathan Ayling, Chief Executive of the Free Speech Union, welcomed the move, saying, “We’re pleased to announce that the Associate Minister of Immigration has committed to granting Candace Owens a work visa, allowing her entry into the country. This is a significant step in defending the speech rights of all New Zealanders.”
Ayling said the initial decision to deny Owens’ entry was “appalling” and likened it to censorship. “When someone is cancelled, it doesn’t just deny the speaker’s rights; it denies the rights of those who want to listen. It’s up to individuals, not the Government, to decide who they want to hear from.”
The Free Speech Union commended Penk for what it described as a principled decision. “The Associate Minister has done the right thing. Immigration New Zealand’s original decision, echoing Australia’s approach, was based on spurious grounds. It’s a dangerous precedent when the State starts cherry-picking which voices are heard.”
Ayling also criticised those advocating for censorship, suggesting that the controversy has only amplified interest in Owens’ visit. “Censorship is an immature response to ideas we don’t like. Those who disagree with Owens should engage in counter speech and peaceful protest instead of resorting to cancellation.”
Broadcaster Chris Lynch is an award winning journalist who also produces Christchurch news and video content for domestic and international companies. Chris blogs at Chris Lynch Media - where this article was sourced.
Ayling said the initial decision to deny Owens’ entry was “appalling” and likened it to censorship. “When someone is cancelled, it doesn’t just deny the speaker’s rights; it denies the rights of those who want to listen. It’s up to individuals, not the Government, to decide who they want to hear from.”
The Free Speech Union commended Penk for what it described as a principled decision. “The Associate Minister has done the right thing. Immigration New Zealand’s original decision, echoing Australia’s approach, was based on spurious grounds. It’s a dangerous precedent when the State starts cherry-picking which voices are heard.”
Ayling also criticised those advocating for censorship, suggesting that the controversy has only amplified interest in Owens’ visit. “Censorship is an immature response to ideas we don’t like. Those who disagree with Owens should engage in counter speech and peaceful protest instead of resorting to cancellation.”
Broadcaster Chris Lynch is an award winning journalist who also produces Christchurch news and video content for domestic and international companies. Chris blogs at Chris Lynch Media - where this article was sourced.
5 comments:
I have no idea what Candace Owen’s priorities are, but I do commend the Minister for his support of freedom of speech.
I consider Candace Owen’s views to be odious and yet, for the reasons espoused by Jonathan Ayling, I too wrote to Minister Penk asking for the immigration decision to be reversed.
How refreshing to see that he has responded to public opinion.
Now, should we try for the same response by writing to Chris Luxon about the Treaty Principles bill?
.
What "minister" gave INZ the "block" order in the first instance?
OMG! this is like a breath of fresh air! This is the so far removed from the old regime's insidious mantra of "WE ARE THE SOLE SOURCE OF TRUTH"
I do hope she can find a venue that will host her . Or will many be closed to her by jumped up little council clerks or staff at academic institutions the like of Massey ,all citing "public safety "
Or maybe she could try her luck in Albert Park and see what New Zealand's version of "free speech" can look like.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.