That happens now in New Zealand hospitals with nurses and doctors present with the ability to save their lives. It happens because mum doesn’t want the baby hence the late term abortion.
I interviewed former midwife Judy Martin Hendrie who left the profession she loved after having to attend one such live birth of a baby at 6 months gestation who was wrapped in a blanket and left to die. The time between the baby’s first and last breath was two excruciating and undoubtedly painful hours.
That’s our so-called caring profession.
It must harden hearts and twist souls, and I don’t know how doctors and nurses switch from saving a young life to abandoning one.
I am sure there are Doctors and Nurses who don’t agree with leaving babies to die but we don’t hear from them. They acquiesce by their silence.
Doctors and Nurses also deliver “gender affirming care”. That means puberty blockers for kids.
Hundreds of kiwi kids have had their puberty blocked.
Until recently our Ministry of Health was advising parents the obvious absurdity that puberty blockers were safe and reversible. That is, that they could pause puberty while your child decided whether they wanted to be a boy or a girl or something else.
Gender affirming care doesn’t stop with puberty blockers. Family First’s Bob McCoskrie revealed this week that doctors and nurses are cutting the male bits off men and making fake female bits while also cutting up the female bits of women and making fake male bits at the cost of over a million dollars a year. That million only got a dozen or so operations.
The waiting list stands at 326. It will no doubt skyrocket with schools actively encouraging sex change. “If your sexuality is outside of the norm, that is awesome,” advises the guidance for year 9 students.
Doctors and Nurses will also shuffle you off before your time. They now help several hundred New Zealanders kill themselves each year.
I have been proud of every job I have done including that of politician. I could not be proud of being a doctor or a nurse. Not while they leave babies to die, stop kids’ puberty, castrate men so they can pretend to be women and help people kill themselves. And call it health care.
That’s our so-called caring profession.
It must harden hearts and twist souls, and I don’t know how doctors and nurses switch from saving a young life to abandoning one.
I am sure there are Doctors and Nurses who don’t agree with leaving babies to die but we don’t hear from them. They acquiesce by their silence.
Doctors and Nurses also deliver “gender affirming care”. That means puberty blockers for kids.
Hundreds of kiwi kids have had their puberty blocked.
Until recently our Ministry of Health was advising parents the obvious absurdity that puberty blockers were safe and reversible. That is, that they could pause puberty while your child decided whether they wanted to be a boy or a girl or something else.
Gender affirming care doesn’t stop with puberty blockers. Family First’s Bob McCoskrie revealed this week that doctors and nurses are cutting the male bits off men and making fake female bits while also cutting up the female bits of women and making fake male bits at the cost of over a million dollars a year. That million only got a dozen or so operations.
The waiting list stands at 326. It will no doubt skyrocket with schools actively encouraging sex change. “If your sexuality is outside of the norm, that is awesome,” advises the guidance for year 9 students.
Doctors and Nurses will also shuffle you off before your time. They now help several hundred New Zealanders kill themselves each year.
I have been proud of every job I have done including that of politician. I could not be proud of being a doctor or a nurse. Not while they leave babies to die, stop kids’ puberty, castrate men so they can pretend to be women and help people kill themselves. And call it health care.
Rodney Hide is former ACT Party leader, and Minister in the National-ACT Government from 2008 to 2011. This article was first published HERE
9 comments:
With these obvious and serious breaches of human rights, you wonder what the Human Rights Commission does and who the Bill of Rights protect. Naturally, they are only concerned with woke politics that trample on people's rights. The Commission is all about co-governance and preventing democracy while the Bill of Rights is all about protecting criminals and gang members so they can offend again. Nothing about societies most vulnerable.
They are "incentivized" to do so by the state, just like they were for the jab and certain hospital procedures designed not to be "helpful". All done with our state governments blessings.
And people wonder why we still have children bashed to death. It doesn't take a genius to work out that if the government allows murder of children before birth why not after? There is simply no sanctity of life anymore. Just wait, you will see the conditions required for euthanasia widened and widened. What a sick society we live in. Any nurse or doctor involved in killing is an absolute disgrace. How do they sleep at night?
Someone with a degree in nuclear physics is no more qualified to comment on the ethics of nuclear weapons than someone who has a working knowledge of the science and technology involved. Likewise, someone with degree in medicine is no more qualified to comment on the ethics of abortion and gender reassignment than someone who has a working knowledge of the science and technology involved. Ethical decisions should not be left to those who have a vested interest (including a pecuniary one) in the issue by virtue of working in that profession.
We live in a democracy where laws are made by parliamentarians appointed by the electorate. Very few parliamentarians have degrees in medicine (or nuclear physics). Lobby groups can be very influential in shaping the law. Those of us opposed to the barbarities described in this article need to get together and exercise our democratic right to put pressure on Parliament to revoke the law changes that have allowed these things to happen and establish an independent ethics body that will produce ethical guidelines with statutory force. Let us forget about our differences (e.g. religious) and join forces to bring the needed changes about.
Add in there their silence over potential covid side effects, and allowing the authorities to usurp their independence as medical professionals, to know what is best for each individual patient.
I knew about this when there was a law change for late term abortions, a few years back. It's appalling, I even spoke to people about it who did not believe me and dismissed my claims as unfounded. For how could something as barabaric as this be true.
I said at the time, what is the difference to someone giving birth in a dumpster? And I was meet with scorn, but this has happened in the past too, and charges were laid.
We have euthanasia now which produces death painlessly and peacefully, but I think somehow the ethical question is too great and is possibly seen as murder in the case of late term abortion.
Such a paradox.
There is a very fine line, being smudged, and at what age will compulsory euthanasia be?
It's all part of the UN agenda and even when these things are presented to us in plain sight we get told off for saying them.
I'm sure there would be many couples who cannot have children who would adopt an unwanted child - even at the eleventh hour. It is shameful that people in the medical profession see allowing the child to die as the only option. When a child is neglected or dies at the hands of parents the story is in the media for days and justice is called for. Where are the media voices on this issue?
Abortion and euthanasia are not the same thing and should be treated differently. Yes they both involve taking a life, but one decision is taken by a consenting adult to end their own life.
Anonymous at 10:27
If you happen to be mentioning euthanasia due to my comment above, I suggest you read and understand what I am saying.
I simply state that you can euthanise someone who consents to death painlessly. For an aborted child they do not even get the painless option and they still don't have any say on the matter.
The ethical question is, if the child was eithanised after birth then it would be murder.
Now, I also say that in the UK they are talking about at what age to have compulsory euthanasia. Which then, it is not voluntary and therefore not consenting.
It is a terrible disregard to life absolutely shocking in all circumsytances
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.