Former Speaker of the House and now ambassador to Ireland Trevor Mallard is facing a High Court lawsuit from a teenage girl who was 11 during the 2022 anti-mandate protest at Parliament.
Despite explicit police warnings that blasting loud music and turning on sprinklers would inflame tensions, Mallard proceeded with the tactics in an attempt to disperse protesters.
The girl, who has applied for name suppression, claims songs like “Let It Go” and “Baby Shark” – which she previously liked – were weaponised against her, causing psychological harm. She is seeking $40,000 in damages for breaches of her rights. Internal police records show top officers, including then-Commissioner Andrew Coster and current Commissioner Richard Chambers, urged Mallard not to proceed, fearing the actions would escalate the situation and harm police strategy.
The case is part of a broader legal push by lawyer Tudor Clee, who is challenging state responses during the pandemic.
Evidence obtained by legacy media under the Official Information Act shows Mallard disregarded repeated police objections and acted on his own authority as Speaker, despite warnings about damage, public perception, and the potential creation of a health hazard.
The lawsuit targets the Speaker’s office, not Mallard personally, with Parliamentary Services confirming costs will be covered from its budget.
Daily Telegraph New Zealand (DTNZ) is an independent news website, first published in October 2021. - where this article was sourced.
The girl, who has applied for name suppression, claims songs like “Let It Go” and “Baby Shark” – which she previously liked – were weaponised against her, causing psychological harm. She is seeking $40,000 in damages for breaches of her rights. Internal police records show top officers, including then-Commissioner Andrew Coster and current Commissioner Richard Chambers, urged Mallard not to proceed, fearing the actions would escalate the situation and harm police strategy.
The case is part of a broader legal push by lawyer Tudor Clee, who is challenging state responses during the pandemic.
Evidence obtained by legacy media under the Official Information Act shows Mallard disregarded repeated police objections and acted on his own authority as Speaker, despite warnings about damage, public perception, and the potential creation of a health hazard.
The lawsuit targets the Speaker’s office, not Mallard personally, with Parliamentary Services confirming costs will be covered from its budget.
Daily Telegraph New Zealand (DTNZ) is an independent news website, first published in October 2021. - where this article was sourced.
8 comments:
Mallard's actions were incredibly childish, as was Labour's reaction to the pandemic altogether. But if a trespasser can sue the owner (or their agent) of the land they are trespassing on for the music played on that property, then the judiciary really does need a shakeup. The article should have mentioned who is funding this? I can guess.
This young lady needs to get over herself!
Mallard has not been the ambassador for a while now
According to Foreign Affairs & Trade website Trev is very much still our ambassador to Ireland. Any questions, ask Winnie.
>"The girl ... claims songs like “Let It Go” and “Baby Shark” – which she previously liked – were weaponised against her, causing psychological harm. She is seeking $40,000 in damages for breaches of her rights."
What rights is she talking about? Being exposed to music she doesn't like...... woops, I note she claims she did like those songs before. So why complain? Oh, because those songs were 'weaponised against her'. Whatever that means....... Causing her 'psychological harm'. Poor little diddums, all traumatised by hearing songs she LIKED? I'm lost. Someone please explain.
In the extremely unlikely case that Miss Diddums is successful, imagine the avalanche of other claims
Possibly, with our extreme woke judges, she might win something out of this bizarre action.
I think there were very many worse things done to people during the pandemic than this. Being excluded from NZ , when they wished to return home , being damaged by the vaccine , losing their income, jobs and business , being deceived and lied to about the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine, not being able to visit dying loved ones , being forced into pointless and ineffective lockdowns , loss of vital years of education to just mention some .
Mallard is an obnoxious and arrogant individual .I don't really care what this girl does to him , however what about all the politicians who just watched on to his stupidity and insults, inflicted on the protesting people many of whom had genuine grievances ?
I wonder if the current Speaker popping up his head and admitting that Mallard was a dickhead might head this one off at the pass and save the taxpayer some costs? Nah, it is never that simple.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.