In a fiery interview on The Platform with Sean Plunket, Destiny Church leader Brian Tamaki delivered a no-holds-barred critique of New Zealand's immigration and multicultural policies, arguing that the country is losing its identity, values, and cohesion under a wave of unregulated mass immigration and imported ideologies.
While Tamaki is no stranger to controversy, much of what he said during the interview echoed growing unease among New Zealanders about the erosion of national identity and the effects of globalist policies. His remarks may not win over the political class or the mainstream media, but they strike a chord with many ordinary Kiwis.
Watch the interview here:

Click to view
“New Zealand is a Christian country”
One of Tamaki’s central points is the belief that New Zealand’s foundational identity is Christian. “Christianity is our founding faith,” he said. “Most New Zealanders would probably accept that, even if they don’t personally believe.”
Tamaki stopped short of calling for a theocracy. Instead, he called for official recognition of Christianity as the country's foundational faith, something he believes would help ground New Zealand culturally and socially in the face of growing religious pluralism. “You can be secular, you can choose what you want to believe, but I just want [Christianity] to be officialised,” he stated.
This isn’t about enforcing belief, he clarified, but about acknowledging what has historically shaped New Zealand’s values, laws, and institutions.
Unchecked immigration and parallel societies
Perhaps Tamaki’s strongest criticism was aimed at New Zealand’s immigration policy, or what he sees as the lack of one. “We’ve got far too much immigration in our country that’s uncontrolled, unvetted, unchecked,” he argued. “Our borders are not open, they’re gone.”
He recounted a recent incident in which an immigrant allegedly attacked members of another religious group shortly after arriving in the country. For Tamaki, this isn’t just an isolated crime, it’s a warning sign of imported conflicts taking root here.
More broadly, he warned of “parallel societies” developing in suburbs like South Auckland, where cultural enclaves are forming in ways that resist integration. “We are losing our Kiwi identity. We are losing our religious identity,” he said. “If we don’t do something to stand up for New Zealand now, we will lose it.”
Assimilation, not division
Tamaki isn’t against immigration per se. His argument centres on the idea that those who come to New Zealand should adapt to Kiwi norms, not the other way around.
“If you come here as an immigrant, then you need to assimilate,” he said. “When you come into this country, you’ve got to integrate into the Kiwi way of life.”
He proposed stricter assimilation standards and even suggested a religious component to immigration policy, allowing for private religious expression but limiting public displays that may clash with the national culture.
While this position may sound extreme to some, it reflects concerns that multiculturalism, without clear boundaries, can lead to fragmentation rather than cohesion.
The problem with “tolerance”
One of Tamaki’s more provocative observations was on how tolerance can be a double-edged sword. He criticised government and media for “tolerating” everything but Christian expression, particularly when that expression challenges progressive orthodoxy.
“When other religions come in and begin to impose their religion upon us, they’re building mosques and temples all over our landscape,” he noted. Meanwhile, Christian beliefs, he argues, are sidelined or even vilified.
He pointed to month-long celebrations such as Diwali as examples of how public space is increasingly being used to promote minority faiths, often with government backing, while Christian perspectives are either ignored or suppressed.
Free speech and hate speech laws
Tamaki didn’t shy away from addressing his critics, particularly those calling for stricter hate speech laws in the wake of Destiny Church’s recent protest. “That’s the only thing I hate. I hate hate speech laws,” he declared.
He argued that such laws are tools used by government to silence dissent and push unpopular opinions underground. “This is silencing the people,” he said. “It’s not about protecting minorities, it’s about suppressing free speech.”
He also rejected accusations of promoting violence. “For the 45 years I’ve been working as a Christian, I’ve never been involved in violence or a violent protest,” he said. “I don’t advocate violence against anyone, any religion, any orientation.”
Tamaki didn’t shy away from addressing his critics, particularly those calling for stricter hate speech laws in the wake of Destiny Church’s recent protest. “That’s the only thing I hate. I hate hate speech laws,” he declared.
He argued that such laws are tools used by government to silence dissent and push unpopular opinions underground. “This is silencing the people,” he said. “It’s not about protecting minorities, it’s about suppressing free speech.”
He also rejected accusations of promoting violence. “For the 45 years I’ve been working as a Christian, I’ve never been involved in violence or a violent protest,” he said. “I don’t advocate violence against anyone, any religion, any orientation.”
A voice for the voiceless?
Tamaki claims that while political elites and media outlets may dismiss him, a silent majority of Kiwis are beginning to agree with his message. “Eighty percent of the country right now agree with what I’m saying,” he told Plunket.
Whether or not that figure is accurate, what’s undeniable is that frustration around immigration, loss of cultural identity, and double standards in public discourse is growing.
Brian Tamaki may not be everyone's cup of tea, but he’s saying things many are too afraid to voice. While his delivery is blunt, even abrasive, the substance of his message raises real questions about the direction New Zealand is heading.
At a time when political leaders avoid hard conversations, Tamaki is forcing them onto the table. Agree or disagree, he’s challenging the status quo
Matua Kahurangi is just a bloke sharing thoughts on New Zealand and the world beyond. No fluff, just honest takes. He blogs on https://matuakahurangi.com/ where this article was sourced.
8 comments:
Perhaps Tamaki is the Enoch Powell of New Zealand. Just look at the issues in the UK with illegal and unfettered legal migration. It is a tinderbox ready to explode.
Perhaps Tamaki should look beyond these shores and realize that most of the wars and conflicts are due to religious beliefs.
NZ should adopt a secular policy for everything in its administration.
Indeed the UK is in a mess with migration. A tinder box soon to explode. NZ follows suit. While I disagree with some of Destiny's actions [ they are aggressive], Tamaki has his heart in the right place and certainly gets media attention. How else to get a point across with the present wet-weak-woke "media".... ? Go for it Brian... and I am an elderly lifelong educated Christian!
Anon 10:12 - that’s the nub of it. NZ is a secular democracy. Religion, including maori spiritualism, are for private life not the public realm.
To - Anon - June 27 @ 6.42AM. You need to add (not should) to your comment the words & efforts that Tommy Robinson has been making over the past years on the same subject that Enoch Powell raised. Both were vilified by the Conservative right as much as the Socialist left. The latter faces " persecution " on a daily basis and has spent time in prison for his views.
Enoch Powell faced the same condemnation, more so from The Conservative Party then the UK MSM.
Interestingly, it is only ' of now ' that other citizens of England are 'rallying to his flag' and as many social media commentators are now saying, "we may have left our push back to late".
As you state - " a tinder box about to explode ".
Brian Tamaki may 'hate, hate Speech Laws', he should cast his eyes to England were they have the most imposing Laws on this topic and the Police on a daily basis arrest people for either verbal and social media posts and it also included street protests that may, can or will " cause harm to another ethnicity " (which means they are from another Country and are not white).
We can be a secular country, but still use Christianity for a basis of how we act as a society. The Ten Commandments are a good start to try and aim towards
Ten Commandments apply to Judaism as well, and ought to Islam. Hardly applies in pre-European Maori....
You're quite right, Anon 942.
Let's see now....... 3 of the 10 'commandments' don't deal with interpersonal relations but rather the relationship between a Bronze Age Middle Eastern desert tribe and its tribal god. The whole shebang has to be read in that context. "Do not kill" certainly didn't apply to other tribes, which their tribal spook ordered them on at least one occasion to slaughter to the last man and boy, but leaving aside "the virgins, take unto themselves". Oh, and I guess that impinges on the "do not commit adultery" one as well, as a Jew could avail himself of any number of sex slaves his tribe had captures from opposing tribes.
"Do not bear false witness" is a legal phrase that refers to committing perjury - bearing in mind that only a Jew could take another Jew to court.
And hey, don't envy your neighbour's slaves or his donkeys, says the last "commandment", 'neighbours' of course being fellow Jews.
Yep, the 10 "commandments" are a great place to start when devising a system of ethics and morality - if you are a Bronze Age Middle Eastern tribesman. Otherwise, it's just a reminder of how moral standards have changed since that primitive state.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.