Pages

Thursday, June 5, 2025

Zoran Rakovic: The Real Equity Is Found in Equations


New Zealand’s education system must shift from ideology to inspiration. It’s time to teach STEM, creativity, and AI to prepare kids for the next century.

Our children deserve rocket fuel, not red tape. As the Ministry of Education clings to 19th-century grievances, the future is slipping through our fingers. This is a call to reclaim education for what it should be: a launchpad into the stars.

It is the 21st century. Our species has placed spacecraft into the distant reaches of the solar system. We have decoded the genome, sketched the outlines of consciousness, and invented machines that can write, calculate, and learn. We have begun to peer into the very origins of the universe. And yet, within our own classrooms, in our very homes, children are being marched backwards into the past—not to learn from it, but to wear it like a burden. This is not education. It is indoctrination masked as moral duty, and it is a betrayal of the human spirit.

Carl Sagan once warned us about the “combustible mixture of ignorance and power.” Today, that mixture is not found in the shadows of a dictatorship or in some smoky war room. It is quietly brewing in the bureaucratic offices of Wellington, within the Ministry of Education—an institution that increasingly treats young minds not as vessels of wonder and potential but as empty buckets into which approved dogma must be poured. This is not science. This is not wisdom. This is the 21st-century version of state control, dressed in the language of healing and justice but functioning as an intellectual straightjacket.

The education system in New Zealand—and elsewhere—is no longer simply failing our children; it is actively robbing them of their future. The emphasis has shifted away from equipping students with the tools to build the next century, and toward weaponising the past in a way that confuses guilt with knowledge, and conformity with understanding. When a child opens a textbook and learns more about historical blame than biological cells, when they can recite ideologies but not equations, when they are told how to feel rather than taught how to think, then we are not preparing them for the stars. We are chaining them to the soil.

This would be lamentable even in a static world. But our world is anything but. The acceleration of change—from AI to quantum computing to synthetic biology—is outpacing our ability to adapt. And yet, instead of reimagining our schools as launchpads into this brave new future, we have allowed them to become confession booths for inherited sins. We are not just losing time; we are losing the moral courage to imagine.

In a just society—one John Rawls might have dreamed of—all children would have the opportunity to flourish. Not according to the dictates of race, history, or inherited grievance, but according to the gifts of their minds, the curiosity of their questions, and the reach of their aspirations. A society governed by reason would place its educational efforts on the frontiers of knowledge, not the battlegrounds of cultural resentment. But ours is a system increasingly afraid of the future and obsessed with revisiting the past, so much so that it has turned the school into a sort of museum of grievance, with teachers serving as tour guides to injustices they did not cause and students as captive audiences forced to atone.

Meanwhile, the real questions go unanswered. How do we equip children to navigate a world where artificial intelligence might outpace human learning? How do we instil the scientific literacy needed to confront climate challenges, biomedical dilemmas, and the ethical puzzles of automation? Where are the physics classes that spark wonder? The coding lessons that unleash creativity? The philosophy discussions that cultivate doubt and humility in the face of great unknowns?

Hope, however, is not lost. It never is—not so long as the human mind retains its spark and its hunger for understanding. That spark is still alive, flickering quietly in garages, libraries, and the rare classroom untouched by orthodoxy. It lives in the quiet passion of a science teacher who dares to take the class outside to observe the stars. It lives in the child who builds a working model of the solar system out of scrap. It lives in parents who ask not, “What is my child’s grievance?” but “What is my child’s gift?”

What we need now is the courage to say: Enough. Enough of the guilt-mongering curricula. Enough of the bureaucrats who have never coded a line, written a poem, or built a thing, telling our children what is worthy of learning. Enough of the self-flagellating syllabi that teach students how to conform but not how to question. Instead, we must build a new vision for education—one worthy of the children we claim to love.

Let us begin by placing science and technology back at the heart of education. Not just as utilitarian tools, but as profound expressions of human curiosity and ingenuity. Physics, chemistry, biology, computer science—these are not just subjects; they are keys to unlocking the mysteries of the universe. Every child, regardless of background, should have access to rigorous, inspiring STEM education from the earliest years.

Let us teach mathematics not as a drudgery, but as a language that allows us to model the world, to forecast pandemics, to design cities, to solve real problems. Let us treat coding as literacy and AI as the new arithmetic—skills that should be as fundamental as reading and writing. And let us do so not through dull, bureaucratic mandates, but through the cultivation of wonder. For when a child understands how a machine can learn, how an equation can describe a galaxy, or how a circuit can sing, that child does not just gain knowledge. That child gains agency.

But let us not stop at STEM. Creativity is not the opposite of science; it is its twin. In the years to come, the most valuable citizens will not be those who merely obey rules, but those who can reimagine them. We must build schools that foster creative thinking, encourage risk, reward originality, and allow students to fail, learn, and try again. Art, music, storytelling—these are not luxuries. They are the engines of empathy and imagination. An education that privileges compliance over creativity is one that raises citizens for bureaucracies, not democracies.

And above all, let us return to the principle that education is about empowerment, not control. The purpose of schooling is not to engineer the right kinds of citizens according to whatever ideological fad holds sway. It is to awaken the minds of young people, to help them discover their own voice and to give them the tools to make that voice count in the world. An education system that fears dissent is not education—it is programming.

The Ministry of Education, like so many organs of the modern state, seems more interested in compliance than curiosity. It speaks in the tones of concern but acts with the instincts of control. Its endless frameworks, competencies, guidelines, and cultural audits have become a fog through which little light passes. In the name of inclusion, it excludes the adventurous spirit of learning. In the name of history, it blinds us to the future. Its corridors echo not with questions but with paperwork.

And yet, we need not despair. Bureaucracies can be reformed. Institutions can be rebuilt. What matters now is that we start telling a new story. A story not of guilt but of possibility. Not of tribalism but of shared humanity. Not of educational systems built to remember grievances but of minds trained to reach for the stars.

This story begins at the dinner table, in the kitchen where a child wonders aloud how a robot works, and the parent doesn’t change the subject but helps them find out. It begins in the school that sets up a telescope, not a guilt trip. It begins with the teacher who refuses to read from the approved script and instead teaches the scientific method. It begins with the leaders who understand that the future belongs not to those who control minds but to those who free them.

Let us aim not just for the next exam, the next funding round, or the next political cycle. Let us aim for the 22nd century. For Mars, the stars, and beyond. For peace, built on understanding. For prosperity, built on innovation. For compassion, built on shared truth.

Let us build an education system worthy of our children, and of the universe we have just begun to explore.

Because somewhere out there—beyond the noise of our politics, beyond the pettiness of our quarrels—there is a galaxy waiting. And in it, perhaps, a child not yet born, looking back on Earth and wondering: Did they prepare me well?

We owe them an answer that begins with wonder, and ends with a telescope in one hand and a pencil in the other. Let that be the promise of our age: not to drag our children into the wounds of the past, but to launch them—truly launch them—into the uncharted realms of what it means to be human.

Zoran Rakovic is a structural engineer with nearly 30 years of experience, who has helped design and strengthen buildings across New Zealand—particularly in Christchurch’s earthquake recovery - while balancing life as a dad, granddad, and outdoor enthusiast. This article was sourced from his BLOG.

11 comments:

glan011 said...

Alas, the teachers and their bureaucracy are long down the drain of ignorance, wokery and guilt. Fully agree with you, including the creativity side. Even there, kids are confined to pre-historic tikis and and taonga. It will take generations to restore.

Anonymous said...

Very well said, Zoran. Our education system has indeed been mired in regressive and damaging ideology, and the quality of our education has diminished badly over more than twenty years. In my view the Ministry of Education was already unfit for purpose several years ago and in 2025 should be re-developed from scratch.

However, we have good people who right now are creating a new national curriculum. We can be confident that matters will improve from now on. David Lillis

Basil Walker said...

Zoran, Regretfully National as defined by the budget is directionless and systematically encouraging policy with tribalism not shared humanity as its direction.
If PM Luxon stated that a binding referendum on the Treaty Principles Bill and one law for all NZ will be an adjunct part of this October local body elections a start towards leaving the scab of the Maori greivance will eventually heal.
H
Luxon has to make a statement of WHY he degraded NZ buy cancelling the Treaty Principles Bill.
Secondly our schools should encourage evening online learning to free the minds as you describe . Information that is not aimed at the numpties but for all the family to share and discuss and learn .
Valuable learning is NOT confined to students.

Anonymous said...

Alas, those who need to read and understand this great article are not the people who are going to read and understand this article.

Gaynor said...

when I asked a family member why he absolutely loved maths he relied "'because of the order but which describes the infinite as with the Mandelbrot formula " . Yet having also taught maths he recognized that quite a bit of it is also sheer slog and few children are naturally attracted to learning for example their times tables.
It is primary school arithmetic that is in crisis and contributing to our few numbers of STEM students. Unfortunately a majority of primary teachers can't or will not teach upper primary arithmetic.

It is not just a matter of wrong content geared towards social engineering but totally ineffective methods of teaching arithmetic . These include besides failing to have rote learning number facts and times tables but also rote learning off one method ( algorithm)of doing two figure multiplying , division, subtraction and adding. Also lacking is thorough teaching of fractions , decimals . percentages and metrics. These require constant revision , reinforcement and consolidation which current teaching theory has labelled indoctrination , repressive and uncreative since the child -centered education ideas dictate the student is to discover much of this knowledge and methods for themselves.

We need a renaissance in education and cancelling out the Marxist propaganda being taught , but also returning to traditional methods of teaching which have been proven , for decades, to be effective by cognitive science . You can consult the free Khan Academy and Singapore maths sites for these effective arithmetic methods and exercises. Also refer to my guide on BV. or other sites to teaching times tables. . Volunteer, charitably to teach upper primary remedial arithmetic groups in your local school.

anonymous said...

If ever. Teachers and bureaucrats are the woke gatekeepers - as per CRT.

Zoran Rakovic said...

Thank you, Gaynor, agree 100%. My favourite method of teaching and learning is REPETITIO EST MATER STUDIORUM (repetition is mother of study - noting that writing Latin should be in all caps, to honour the original style).

glan011 said...

Indeed Zoran. The rot set in with the arrival of calculators... and that was decades ago. No more rote tables chanted, mental arithmetic, same thing with spelling. As for LATIN.... God help us... using yer brain !!! Learning vocab and grammar !!!

Michael Waldegrave said...

Yeah ….. beautifully written, as only an educated person could do. Though it’s a bit too long for the ordinary person. Could AI abbreviate it by half ??

Anonymous said...

Are the bureaucrats in Wellington happy that they are destroying the future of their children and grandchildren ?
Are they pleased that their descendants, educated in NZ, will never fit into the real world in any other country ?
Totally ill prepared to participate in real world work situations .
Some of us real Kiwis were desirable employees offshore because we had an all round, well balanced education.
Not now, especially if they are imbued with all this Maori cultural crap , rather than real skills.

I do hope every Ministry of Education employee going to work on Friday morning thinks about what they are doing, exercise their conscious, speak up to all those woke people around.

Think about Zoran, who has made a significant contribution to NZ without needing a single word of artificial Maori te reo, who didn't need to heed any Maori cultural demands.

ZoranRakovic said...

Thanks for the kind comment, Michael—really appreciated. I get where you're coming from. In a world of scrolling and skimming, longer pieces can feel like a bit of a commitment.

That said, I think Neil Postman put it best when he warned that “we are amusing ourselves to death”—that is, we’re training ourselves to prefer snippets and distractions over depth and reflection. Some ideas just need a bit more room to breathe.

Of course, AI can absolutely help shorten things—and maybe there’s value in offering both a long and short version. But I’d be cautious about trimming too much. Sometimes, it’s in the slow read that things actually stick.

Appreciate you reading it—especially all the way through!

Post a Comment

Thanks for engaging in the debate!

Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.