Spiralling rates are the biggest issue. “Why has your council lifted rates by more than the rate of inflation this last term?” is question number one. And don’t take bullswool for an answer. Here is one obvious reason for spiralling rates. Most councils in New Zealand have staff levels in excess of what is actually needed, and existing councillors seeking re-election need to be asked how often their council has reviewed its staffing levels. After all, staff salaries are usually any council’s biggest item in its budget. Vaguely conscious that they are over-staffed, far too many council executives keep dreaming up new permits and compliance costs, the income from which goes on paying for their empires of surplus employees. But, these permits and charges slow progress and economic growth, which also pushes up costs for the ratepayer.
The Taxpayers’ Union, that does a splendid job on many fronts, has begun a worthy “Cap Rates Now” campaign. They claim, "Cumulatively, over the last three years, the average rates hike is an incredible 34.52 percent. Over the same timeframe, inflation has been just 13.7 percent." Yes, but they also need to explore a little more deeply the cause of the problem. Not only staff levels, but careless contracts for outside council services should be scrutinised carefully. It’s the only area where in my days as an Auckland City Councillor I ever came across any whiff of council corruption.
A new area where extra care at the local level is fundamental concerns the rapidly escalating racism being inflicted on central and now local government by Maori opportunists. We know of the nonsense being inflicted on schools in the form of excessive kapa haka and te reo lessons during school hours, and of the steadily declining academic achievement levels at secondary schools. But somehow no one ever connects the dots and pushes the time-wasting activities out of the way in the interest of better results for our kids.
A more urgent problem is the push by the Wellington bureaucracy to include special advantages for Maori in state activities. Wilfully overlooking Clause 3 of The Treaty of Waitangi that guarantees equal rights (and duties) for Maori, local government is now making the same mistake. An Auckland friend with Waikato connections told me about the Hamilton City Council’s ill-thought-through new proposed management policies that appear to have been dreamt up by a collection of Tainui racists. The so-called Te Tiriti obligations of Hamilton City Council are entirely a one-way street for Maori benefits. And there’s no recognition of the fact that every one of these claimants has more European ancestors than Maori.
John F. Kennedy famously declared “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country”. This set of proposals is the very reverse. The authors of the proposed policy tell us that Hamilton City Council must let Maori co-manage all natural resources, rivers, lakes and parks; pay for and celebrate historical occasions that Maori dream up; and ensure that Maori are involved in all decision-making. Not only will the council need to involve Maori in everything, but will have to pay them big sums in consultation fees. The fact that many Maori stand at local body election time and get elected to the decision-making body seems to be of no account. They don’t believe in democracy. They call it the tyranny of the majority.
At a rough estimate, I’d expect the proposed management structure, if adopted, would add at least $1 billion per annum, and growing, to the current Hamilton City Council rates bill. And the whole argument is couched in terms of Maori entitlement under te Tiriti, not the Treaty of Waitangi which the authors regard as a lower form of life because it contained the words “ceding sovereignty” to the Crown. No longer any word about Maori duties to the other residents and ratepayers; they are just expected to pick up the tab.
Hamilton City Council is only one council being subjected to this kind of blackmail. Other councils are facing it too. And I haven’t heard a dicky bird from central government that ought to be stepping in and stopping this nonsense in its tracks.
That’s why it is very important that everyone starts taking a much closer interest in the activities of their local council before 12 October. Low grade central and local governance could be about to cost us all a fortune for no discernible gain except for the people claiming they are special, very expensive, te Tiriti gatekeepers.
Historian Dr Michael Bassett, a Minister in the Fourth Labour Government. This article was first published HERE
The Taxpayers’ Union, that does a splendid job on many fronts, has begun a worthy “Cap Rates Now” campaign. They claim, "Cumulatively, over the last three years, the average rates hike is an incredible 34.52 percent. Over the same timeframe, inflation has been just 13.7 percent." Yes, but they also need to explore a little more deeply the cause of the problem. Not only staff levels, but careless contracts for outside council services should be scrutinised carefully. It’s the only area where in my days as an Auckland City Councillor I ever came across any whiff of council corruption.
A new area where extra care at the local level is fundamental concerns the rapidly escalating racism being inflicted on central and now local government by Maori opportunists. We know of the nonsense being inflicted on schools in the form of excessive kapa haka and te reo lessons during school hours, and of the steadily declining academic achievement levels at secondary schools. But somehow no one ever connects the dots and pushes the time-wasting activities out of the way in the interest of better results for our kids.
A more urgent problem is the push by the Wellington bureaucracy to include special advantages for Maori in state activities. Wilfully overlooking Clause 3 of The Treaty of Waitangi that guarantees equal rights (and duties) for Maori, local government is now making the same mistake. An Auckland friend with Waikato connections told me about the Hamilton City Council’s ill-thought-through new proposed management policies that appear to have been dreamt up by a collection of Tainui racists. The so-called Te Tiriti obligations of Hamilton City Council are entirely a one-way street for Maori benefits. And there’s no recognition of the fact that every one of these claimants has more European ancestors than Maori.
John F. Kennedy famously declared “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country”. This set of proposals is the very reverse. The authors of the proposed policy tell us that Hamilton City Council must let Maori co-manage all natural resources, rivers, lakes and parks; pay for and celebrate historical occasions that Maori dream up; and ensure that Maori are involved in all decision-making. Not only will the council need to involve Maori in everything, but will have to pay them big sums in consultation fees. The fact that many Maori stand at local body election time and get elected to the decision-making body seems to be of no account. They don’t believe in democracy. They call it the tyranny of the majority.
At a rough estimate, I’d expect the proposed management structure, if adopted, would add at least $1 billion per annum, and growing, to the current Hamilton City Council rates bill. And the whole argument is couched in terms of Maori entitlement under te Tiriti, not the Treaty of Waitangi which the authors regard as a lower form of life because it contained the words “ceding sovereignty” to the Crown. No longer any word about Maori duties to the other residents and ratepayers; they are just expected to pick up the tab.
Hamilton City Council is only one council being subjected to this kind of blackmail. Other councils are facing it too. And I haven’t heard a dicky bird from central government that ought to be stepping in and stopping this nonsense in its tracks.
That’s why it is very important that everyone starts taking a much closer interest in the activities of their local council before 12 October. Low grade central and local governance could be about to cost us all a fortune for no discernible gain except for the people claiming they are special, very expensive, te Tiriti gatekeepers.
Historian Dr Michael Bassett, a Minister in the Fourth Labour Government. This article was first published HERE
3 comments:
Christopher Luxon has the power, and indeed promised, to get rid of all the co governance legislation which would immediately save the taxpayer millions. By sitting on his hands, assets belonging to all NZ’ers are being gifted to so called Māori, who have no qualms about making money at the expense of those same tax paying NZ’ers. Who said, “we won’t create another injustice in order to satisfy Māori”. Yeah right!!
Whoever we vote for will run into obstruction by ''correct thinking'' council officials, delays and legal points of contention etc. Also watch how msm cover the buildup to the election, which candidates they give more coverage too (favourable tone) and who they almost ignore *like Chong in New Plymouth unless he is under attack. In any case, the elected councils will continue to pursue what they regard as required partnerships by creating more appointed clip-ons for ''Maori'' on various committees etc with voting rights. And elected councillors would have to be brave to not go along with what ''Maori'' mixed race activists want. The protests, the chanting, the haka, the intimidation etc. Democracy is changing (and Labour associates all ex msm agree with that, because ''democracy doesn't work for minorities'' and ''progressive changes are undone and this can't be allowed.'' Oh the moral superiority of the totalitarians.
You are quite correct, Michael. As the years have gone by, most Council's have shed their inhouse expertise and now have big PR communication teams and a raft of box-tickers, yet getting hold of anyone, yet alone with answers, is that much harder. Like CEO's in the corporate world, who love mergers and acquisitions to build their own empires and paychecks, too many Council CEO's and Mayor's are allowing staffing levels to burgeon, to in effect feather their own nests. As for Maori consultation, why is that cost never transparent and why, in any event should it be a Council's responsibility to "give effect to" the Treaty, when it certainly isn't "the Crown" and, in reality, it's no longer relevant given the parties to it (and our world) have morphed into something quite different to that which existed nearly two centuries ago?
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.