Pages

Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Matua Kahurangi: New Zealand’s opening the floodgates to unvetted Indian degrees


New Zealand has thrown open its doors to Indian degree-holders, scrapping the critical qualification assessment process that once ensured a baseline of credibility for foreign credentials. According to a recent report from The Times of India, this policy shift is being hailed as a “streamlined” pathway for Indian graduates to access visas, work, and potentially permanent residency in New Zealand. Beneath the glossy rhetoric of global talent and Indo-Kiwi partnerships lies a dangerous gamble that threatens the integrity of New Zealand’s immigration system and the livelihoods of our citizens. This is a reckless invitation to chaos.

New Zealand doesn’t need an influx of unverified Indian degree-holders flooding its job market. The country’s labour force is already strained, with local graduates struggling to secure meaningful employment in an economy battered by global uncertainties. By removing the rigorous checks previously required to validate foreign qualifications, New Zealand is rolling the dice on credentials that may not hold up under scrutiny.


Pabjeet Singh looks happy that he can finally move to New Zealand after purchasing his degree on WhatsApp.

India, a nation notorious for its bureaucratic inefficiencies and widespread academic fraud, is hardly the gold standard for trustworthy degrees. From diploma mills churning out questionable certificates to rampant corruption in educational institutions, the risks of accepting Indian qualifications at face value are glaring. Yet, New Zealand’s policymakers seem content to turn a blind eye, prioritising geopolitical posturing over the nation’s economic stability.

This whole saga reminds me of Yuvaraj Krishnan - the bogus doctor who conned his way into Middlemore Hospital with fake credentials. He was eventually sentenced to 3 years and 7 months in prison. At just 31, Krishnan managed to fool the system until the Counties Manukau DHB finally sacked him. Police charged him with 13 offences, including perjury, forgery, and the dishonest use of official documents.


Yuvaraj Krishnan.

Krishnan is not the only one. In 2015, Mohamed Shakeel Siddiqui faked U.S. psychiatric credentials to land a job at Waikato Hospital, earning $165,000 a year. Though a qualified doctor, he forged specialist documents and references to deceive the Medical Council. After six months, concerns about his competence led to an investigation. He later pleaded guilty to deception and forgery, was sentenced to four years and three months in prison, and deported.



The Times of India article paints this decision as a bold step to attract “India’s brightest minds,” but who’s verifying the brightness? Without the Labour Qualifications and Equivalence Assessment (LQEA), there’s no mechanism to ensure these degrees are worth the paper they’re printed on. Are we to believe that every Indian graduate now eligible for a visa is a prodigy destined to revolutionize New Zealand’s tech or healthcare sectors? Hardly. The reality is that this policy opens the door to a flood of applicants, many of whom may hold credentials from subpar institutions, clogging up industries already saturated with talent. Local workers, from Auckland to Christchurch, will bear the brunt as employers, lured by cheaper labour, sideline Kiwis in favour of untested foreign hires.

This isn’t just about economics, it’s also about cultural and social cohesion. New Zealand’s small population and unique identity have long been its strength, but rapid demographic shifts driven by unchecked immigration threaten to erode that foundation. Indian migrants, already a significant presence in cities like Auckland, are steadily reshaping communities, often forming insular enclaves that strain public resources and challenge integration. The Times of India report boasts of a “deeper Indo-Kiwi talent partnership,” but what’s the cost? A nation that prides itself on its tight-knit communities risks becoming a fragmented mosaic, where local voices are drowned out by an influx of outsiders who do not share the same values or commitment to New Zealand’s way of life.

The argument for this policy hinges on New Zealand’s supposed need to compete in the “global education and migration race.” But why should New Zealand lower its standards to keep up with countries like Australia or Canada, which are themselves grappling with the fallout of lax immigration policies? The promise of streamlined visa access might attract more applicants, but quantity doesn’t equal quality. Immigration experts cited in the article claim this reflects “geopolitical foresight,” but it smells more like geopolitical pandering, a desperate bid to curry favour with India’s growing economic clout at the expense of New Zealand’s own interests.

Why should Indian degree-holders get a free pass while others, from countries with equally or more robust educational systems, still face the full weight of scrutiny? This selective leniency smacks of favouritism, undermining the principles of equality and merit that New Zealand claims to uphold. If the goal is to attract global talent, why not strengthen standards across the board rather than carving out exemptions for one group? It seems that New Zealand is willing to compromise its integrity for a quick influx of applicants, regardless of the long-term consequences.

The defenders of this policy will cry “diversity” and “inclusion,” but diversity without discernment is a recipe for disaster. New Zealand’s immigration system should prioritize Kiwis, those who’ve built the nation, paid its taxes, and invested in its future. Instead, this move risks flooding the market with unverified qualifications, undercutting local workers, and straining public services already stretched thin. It’s time for New Zealand to wake up and reverse this shortsighted decision before it’s too late. The country deserves better than to become a dumping ground for dubious degrees and unchecked ambition.

Matua Kahurangi is just a bloke sharing thoughts on New Zealand and the world beyond. No fluff, just honest takes. He blogs on https://matuakahurangi.com/ where this article was sourced.

11 comments:

anonymous said...

Stanford is minister for Education and Immigration - totally unqualified for either job. Look at the mess in each area.

Anonymous said...

“The country deserves better than to become a dumping ground for dubious degrees and unchecked ambition”.
Our country deserves better than our “foreign controlled” government and its foreign agents within masquerading as representing the will of the people.

Barend Vlaardingerbroek said...

Mickey Mouse degrees from fake 'universities' arise even in the UK (e.g. Knightsbridge) and US (e.g. Patriot). Indian universities range in quality from gutter-level to excellent. It is highly inadvisable to have rules that apply to degree holders on the basis of the country where they studied. This job has to be done institution by institution.

Anonymous said...

The results of unbridled immigration policies is for all to see in the UK. White Christian people will soon be the minority overtaken by muslims.
The ensuing civil war for Britain is upon us. The politicians have basically admitted they don’t know what to do. In the vacuum the people will rise up and take matters into their own hands.
Let this be a warning for NZ. Tighten up immigration and deport all illegals.

Anonymous said...

Recent debate about the academic quality of a New Zealand Medical School might explain how a fake doctor can get away with it.

Anonymous said...

What about the quality of NZ Uni degrees? A maori doctor from Otago Uni? A fully indoctrinated lawyer from Auckland Uni, or a Khylee Quince special from AUT? Although hopefully not fraudulent, one could argue that our unis aren’t so very flash either. Evidently our top students are now more likely to undertake their tertiary quals offshore than here at home. That’s a pretty sad indictment.

The Jones Boy said...

I suspect this has a lot to do with the our need to negotiate a Free Trade Agreement with India. Nailing that is a high priority for our offshore diplomatic efforts because the benefits are inescapable, particularly if we are stuck with primary products that are now unsaleable in the US due to their blunderer-in-chief's primitive approach to international trade. FTAs these days encompass a lot more than just free trade, and removing immigration barriers are just part of the mix. Any unilateral action on that front by New Zealand might therefore be be a tactic to grab the attention of the Indian authorities and build on Luxon's recent visit to press the flesh. Given the respective sizes of our economies, we don't have a lot of leverage in negotiations so we clearly need to do something extraordinary to get their attention. Maybe Luxon's recent visit has started some balls rolling. After all, we need the FTA a lot more than India needs it.

Anonymous said...

You are on the money here Maitua. But none of this is accidental. It is all part of the uniparty’s plan to demolish our foundational culture. With a ‘diverse’ and ‘enriched’ culture we can easily guarantee a rapid move into the 3rd world, accompanied by our old allies the UK, Canada and Australia. Rest assured, it’s all part of the plan that our pollies signed up to a fair few years ago.

sam said...

.......and kindycindy flapping her jowls at harvard..............is that why gump is threatening finances.....................? comrade comrade comrade

Anonymous said...

My business experience with some Indians offshore has been simply fraudulent - the repeated promises to pay that never happened - totally sincere pleading for yet another week, with never an intention to pay.
Never again.

Sadly, this tarnishs the reputation of the excellent Indian business people.

CXH said...

The Jones Boy, do you really think the 'FTA' with India will give our primary products open access to their market? If so, I have a bridge for sale.

Post a Comment

Thanks for engaging in the debate!

Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.