Because if you watched the campaign, Kaipara’s performance was anything but convincing. Time and again she exposed herself as underprepared, out of her depth, and frankly struggling. Her public appearances were memorable not for bold policy announcements or coherent debate, but for awkward silences, stumbling answers, and a physical appearance that raised genuine concern. Frail, gaunt, and clearly unwell, she hardly projected the strength or stamina one would expect of a new MP. In most jobs, questions about someone’s basic fitness to do the work would be front and centre. But here? Competence doesn’t matter. Choosing incompetence wrapped in identity does.
And while Kaipara struggled through the campaign, TPM’s political machine was doing what it does best bending or breaking the rules. On election day itself, when campaigning is strictly banned, TPM MP Tākuta Ferris thought it a great idea to post a picture of himself holding greasy fries and urging people to vote. A clear breach of electoral law, and one the Electoral Commission has now confirmed it’s “looking into.” Translation: don’t expect much. For TPM, the law is more of a suggestion than an obligation.
But none of this made a shred of difference to the outcome. Kaipara’s win wasn’t about policies, performance, or lawfulness. It was about identity. TPM is a tribe, not a rational policy movement. Its supporters don’t care whether their candidate is prepared, healthy, or even competent. All that matters is that she wears the right label. It is ethnic bloc voting in its purest form voters aligning with candidates from their ethnic group regardless of merit or ability.
That’s the dirty little secret of this so-called landslide. If you slapped the TPM logo on a cardboard cut out, it would probably win Tāmaki Makaurau just as easily. Loyalty to the tribe outweighs everything else even the obvious reality that the chosen candidate can’t handle scrutiny.
And yet, in the aftermath, we’re told this is a “mandate.” A triumph. Proof of Māori political strength. Let’s be clear: it’s proof of nothing more than tribal loyalty overwhelming reasoned judgment. Competence, policy, and legality were all tossed out the window. This was an election result driven not by what Kaipara said or did, but by what she represented: identity above all.
So what now? We have a new MP who has already demonstrated she’s incapable of withstanding pressure. We have a party that treats electoral law as optional. And we have an electorate that happily rewards both, because substance is secondary to symbolism.
In short, Tāmaki Makaurau has delivered us the perfect case study in New Zealand’s growing identity politics problem: a Parliament where ethnicity trumps ability, tribal loyalty trumps law, and rational policy making doesn’t even get a look in.
Steven is an entrepreneur and an ex RNZN diver who likes travelling, renovating houses, Swiss Watches, history, chocolate art and art deco.
11 comments:
And perfect proof why the Maori seats need to be gone.
The problem with most of the Western parliaments now is that political parties are selecting candidates who put personal considerations over National interest. With the Maori Party it is Maori identity. In Britain it is Islam over British identity. In Europe it is the same. In order to be harmonious and unified, a country really needs one national identity, one flag and preferably one major language. This in no way diminishes individual ethnic groups within each country.
Debbie Packer and others call for separate Maori health facilities. Surely she should realise that sets a precedent in the future for separate White, Indian, Chinese and others having their own as well? At some point in time that would happen.
Act's treaty bill was designed to counter further slide into identity politics, but was rejected outright by not only, and predictably the left, but unbelievably the right.
That decision sealed New Zealands fate.
The latest polls still have the voting public split down the middle. At this point the right may secure victory next year but unlikely to have the Act party as its major coalition partner.
Instead the make up of that coalition will still have a numpty as its leader and cowards in its caucus.
Separate health facilities which THEY fund out of the vast payments already in the hands of their ELITE.... go figure!!!
Not sure the right rejected the TP Bill. Luxon ordered Meager to run the Selected Committee so that support submissions were diminished in number and impact - while reject submissions (and associated Maori speakers) were given preferential treatment. Voters will not forget Luxon's comment that he would " spike the Bill."
Presumably the self-identified Maori that are on the Maori roll are the most politically active.
I think the real story is out of the most politically active Maori less than 1in4 bothered to vote at all
I think that fact is an important. The noisy lunatic separatist Maori are even a smaller number than we think.
Pause for a moment: this newest MP - if ever in a Left Coalition - could be passing laws on NZ's social and economic well being.
A terrifying thought.
I want us all to spike Luxon!
Reply to glan011. Absolutely! Whitey, I Indian, Chinese and others would all fund their own. The part-Maori health facility would be funded by all of us! That is why someone needs to put a halt to all this. Where is the business plan? On what basis do the taxpayers have to fund this? as well as mainstream media and court cases and. all the rest....we are not the ones who want apartheid.
Not to worry, plenty spikes being sharpened in the Natz for sure
Please remember before you get animated about the Tamaki Makaura result almost 90 % of potential voters rejected Labour .
The Bi - Election is as irrelevant as a Curia Poll of a 1,000 people
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.