Look, New Zealand is doing something straight-up weird, and most people feel it but can’t quite name it. We live in a country that calls itself modern and fair, but the truth is, the system treats citizens differently depending on where your ancestors came from. You didn’t do anything. You didn’t vote wrong. You didn’t rob anyone. But if your grandparents arrived on the wrong waka, you get less say. And somehow, everyone pretends this is noble. This is madness.
Turn on the six o’clock news and it’s the same song: colonisation, Treaty this, partnership that, ancestral rights everywhere. Every week, like a broken record. You’ve got bureaucrats talking about “co-governance” and “Treaty principles,” like they’re some kind of holy law, while ordinary people—mum and dad, the bloke down the street—just nod along because everyone’s too scared to say it out loud. And the stuff they’re talking about? Mostly dead people. Most of it happened 200 years ago. Yet we let it decide who gets a real say in 2026. That’s not democracy. That’s backward-ass apartheid with a fancy accent.
Think about it in plain language. Some people get extra political juice just because their bloodline is “special.” Not because they’re smart. Not because they’re decent. Not because they actually contribute. Bloodline. That’s the system. And everyone else? You get to sit there, watch it happen, and pretend it’s fair. It’s like playing Monopoly where someone starts the game with all the hotels and tells you it’s moral because their great-grandfather landed first.
People defending this will say it’s “historical correction.” Bullsh*t. History doesn’t have an off switch. There is no expiry date for past wrongs. If we base politics on ancestral grievance, the argument never ends. Someone will always find another reason to claim extra privileges, another settlement, another grievance. You can’t fix it. You can’t close the book. You’re stuck playing referee in a family fight that no one alive actually started. And somehow, everyone acts like this is sophisticated.
Here’s another thing most people get immediately: ancestry as authority is nonsense. Humans move, mix, intermarry, conquer, flee, adapt—always have. You trace anyone’s lineage far enough, and it’s a big pile of crossover, chaos, and migration. Nobody gets to say, “I alone get moral high ground because my people were here first.” That’s ridiculous. If political power flowed from arrival dates, we’d have to redraw the country every five minutes. But New Zealand treats one point in history like it’s a sacred code, untouchable, forever decisive. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens—mixed race, immigrant, kiwi born—get shuffled around like pawns.
And what does this look like in practice? Boards split by ancestry, local councils with reserved seats, government agencies legally required to consult some people before others. A Māori person might get priority access to water rights or resource discussions simply because of lineage. A Pākehā, Asian, or Pacific Islander citizen? Sorry mate, you wait your turn. It’s subtle, polite, and bureaucratic, but it’s apartheid dressed in a suit.
Let’s be honest: culture doesn’t need political privilege to survive. Language, tradition, music, stories—these live in communities, homes, hearts. Nobody needs co-governance to chant a waiata or cook a hangi. But the state treats culture as a political weapon, and that’s where the rot sets in. Culture is supposed to be lived, not legislated. When the law turns culture into a tool for unequal power, it’s no longer tradition. It’s a cage.
So what’s the alternative? The answer is boring in theory, but revolutionary in this country: one legal status. One vote. One law. Rights for people alive today, not ghosts from 200 years ago. History taught honestly, without hero worship or selective outrage. Settlements that end instead of regenerating indefinitely. A society where ordinary people can actually feel the rules are fair without checking someone’s whakapapa before agreeing.
You want examples you can feel? Imagine a kid in Auckland, born here, mixed Māori and Pākehā. She grows up being told some people have special privileges because of ancestry. She sees the boards, the councils, the co-governance arrangements. She hears the “principles.” She notices she isn’t equal. That’s not history teaching. That’s social engineering. That’s telling a living person that their bloodline determines their worth. And no amount of fancy language changes the fact it’s wrong.
The country can keep tiptoeing around the past, pretending this is a temporary fix. But avoidance is lying to yourself. This system entrenches division. It tells ordinary people that fairness is negotiable. That equality is optional. And it’s building resentment, confusion, and cynicism faster than any politician admits.
Here’s the truth nobody says loud enough: New Zealand has to choose. Either the living are equal under the law, or we continue letting dead people run the show. There’s no middle ground. And the longer we wait, the angrier the population becomes. Because people aren’t stupid—they just know fairness when they see it. And right now, most New Zealanders can feel they’re being played, and it pisses them off.
The clock is ticking. History isn’t coming back to argue. The ghosts have already done their talking. Now it’s the living who have to take control. And the sooner we stop pretending that lineage equals authority, the sooner the country can breathe. Otherwise, we keep running in circles, fighting battles that ended centuries ago, while the people alive today get sidelined for no reason other than their DNA.
John Robertson is a patriotic New Zealander who frequently posts on Facebook.
People defending this will say it’s “historical correction.” Bullsh*t. History doesn’t have an off switch. There is no expiry date for past wrongs. If we base politics on ancestral grievance, the argument never ends. Someone will always find another reason to claim extra privileges, another settlement, another grievance. You can’t fix it. You can’t close the book. You’re stuck playing referee in a family fight that no one alive actually started. And somehow, everyone acts like this is sophisticated.
Here’s another thing most people get immediately: ancestry as authority is nonsense. Humans move, mix, intermarry, conquer, flee, adapt—always have. You trace anyone’s lineage far enough, and it’s a big pile of crossover, chaos, and migration. Nobody gets to say, “I alone get moral high ground because my people were here first.” That’s ridiculous. If political power flowed from arrival dates, we’d have to redraw the country every five minutes. But New Zealand treats one point in history like it’s a sacred code, untouchable, forever decisive. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens—mixed race, immigrant, kiwi born—get shuffled around like pawns.
And what does this look like in practice? Boards split by ancestry, local councils with reserved seats, government agencies legally required to consult some people before others. A Māori person might get priority access to water rights or resource discussions simply because of lineage. A Pākehā, Asian, or Pacific Islander citizen? Sorry mate, you wait your turn. It’s subtle, polite, and bureaucratic, but it’s apartheid dressed in a suit.
Let’s be honest: culture doesn’t need political privilege to survive. Language, tradition, music, stories—these live in communities, homes, hearts. Nobody needs co-governance to chant a waiata or cook a hangi. But the state treats culture as a political weapon, and that’s where the rot sets in. Culture is supposed to be lived, not legislated. When the law turns culture into a tool for unequal power, it’s no longer tradition. It’s a cage.
So what’s the alternative? The answer is boring in theory, but revolutionary in this country: one legal status. One vote. One law. Rights for people alive today, not ghosts from 200 years ago. History taught honestly, without hero worship or selective outrage. Settlements that end instead of regenerating indefinitely. A society where ordinary people can actually feel the rules are fair without checking someone’s whakapapa before agreeing.
You want examples you can feel? Imagine a kid in Auckland, born here, mixed Māori and Pākehā. She grows up being told some people have special privileges because of ancestry. She sees the boards, the councils, the co-governance arrangements. She hears the “principles.” She notices she isn’t equal. That’s not history teaching. That’s social engineering. That’s telling a living person that their bloodline determines their worth. And no amount of fancy language changes the fact it’s wrong.
The country can keep tiptoeing around the past, pretending this is a temporary fix. But avoidance is lying to yourself. This system entrenches division. It tells ordinary people that fairness is negotiable. That equality is optional. And it’s building resentment, confusion, and cynicism faster than any politician admits.
Here’s the truth nobody says loud enough: New Zealand has to choose. Either the living are equal under the law, or we continue letting dead people run the show. There’s no middle ground. And the longer we wait, the angrier the population becomes. Because people aren’t stupid—they just know fairness when they see it. And right now, most New Zealanders can feel they’re being played, and it pisses them off.
The clock is ticking. History isn’t coming back to argue. The ghosts have already done their talking. Now it’s the living who have to take control. And the sooner we stop pretending that lineage equals authority, the sooner the country can breathe. Otherwise, we keep running in circles, fighting battles that ended centuries ago, while the people alive today get sidelined for no reason other than their DNA.
John Robertson is a patriotic New Zealander who frequently posts on Facebook.

15 comments:
Please get this opinion piece published on all forms of media! It is plain commonsense and logical-traits missing in today’s politicians!
Simple as that.
Land claims are the most contentious issue for many New Zealanders. In order to progress and become a civilised nation, Maori were able to sell their land to early European settlers. This was done legally under various pieces of legislation. Otherwise, one can assume no progress would have been made in New Zealand becoming a forward-thinking, civilised, successful country. Bearing in mind also, in early days much land was not occupied at all. As in all countries in the world, land has changed hands. Some people have benefitted and others have not. I think it's disastrous the track we are on handing over large chunks of land based on the ethnicity of a minority group, whatever their early settler status. Renaming cities, towns, rivers, lakes and mountains, regardless of previous historical significance, just negates our real history.
Simple solution: referendum now on democracy or ethnocracy. Hold Luxon to this issue for all NZers if he wants re-election.
Simple example: a typical NZ family - one member of the couple has Maori ancestry - as will their children. The spouse without such ancestry will always be different - and likely second class. So, division even at family level.
No society will thrive under these conditions as unity is lost forever.
"it’s apartheid dressed in a suit."
That is exactly what is happening, RIGHT NOW, in New Zealand. APARTHEID.
Its not bloodlines running the country.
Maori organizations registered with the NZ Govt have no standing or jurisdiction. They are merely quasi government institutions through which division is brought about very quickly. The govt uses these Iwi, Trust boards, Waitangi Tribunal and other forms to advance THEIR agenda and deflect criticism which creates more division throughout the population as to how money and resources are managed.
We are being governed by quasi government courts; the Waitangi Tribunal, military orders of the Roman Catholic Church (Knights of Malta/Jesuits) and the Roman Curia of the Holy Roman Empire as expressed through the United Nations.
To understand what’s REALLY going on in New Zealand and other “conquered countries” we have to go way back to 1066 and William the Conqueror. A good starting point is: Who is the Government? The great Deception by Ewan Campbell
Absolutely, Doug. Yet we let the grifters, the wokesters, and the forked-tongue politicians lead us down this path without our say. Well, it's past time we had our say and ended this stupid, divisive nonsense for good - for the sake of our nation.
I don't blame those who choose to identify with their Maori DNA- miniscule though it may be in many cases - they are just looking after themselves as best they can, largely deficient in logical fact and historical knowledge - but grabby. Those who enrage me are the smarmy and the woke and the condescending ( I read they may be largely female - grrrr!) and those pakeha (men?) who see something in it for themselves. Luxon is a lost cause, but i'm going all out for ACT next year - referenda ?
Sorry Anon 10.39. Your little list is incomplete since you have omitted the International Jewish Conspiracy currently lead by George Soros with the active participation of the Lizard people. Get your facts straight please.
John Robertson you’re absolutely right. You see it. We can see it. Most Nzers I know and meet now see it. Why can’t the National Party see it? What is National’s relationship with the iwi leaders lobby? Why didn’t National support Act’s TPB? Luxon actually refused to support equality under the law. He’s given us no clear reason why. What’s wrong with these people?
Let’s face reality; New Zealand is NOT now a real Democracy.
It’s a sort of NEO-ARISTOCRACY, justified on the assumption, that some people have an ancestor, who migrated to New Zealand perhaps up to 470 years before many others.
Laws, ‘Settlements’, regulations and Institutions are riddled with special rights and treatment based on who a few, or even one, of your many ancestors were.
Since the 1970’s, the average Joe and Mary Blogs, have been “sold down the river” by a succession of ‘do good’ politicians and Governments.
Any ‘Partnership’ or ‘co-governance’ arrangements are un-Democratic.
The ‘Principles’ concept was invented by Geoffrey Palmer, who was thus fraudulently trying to produce a ‘NEW REVISED’ version of the Treaty.
We are now also being ‘educated’ that Maori society was so so wonderful before the nasty nasty 1840 colonisation.
There is no doubt that colonisation was brutal in many other places on the Planet.
But New Zealand is probably an unique exception.
Colonisation of New Zealand, introduced British Law, and ended the devastating and wide spread utu killings, cannibalism and slavery.
There was a negotiated Treaty, wilfully ‘signed’ by about 520 chiefs, and remarkably for the time, Maori were immediately given British Citizenship.
In a REAL Democracy, All Citizens have Equal Rights and Responsibilities.
All are free to practice their own Religion and Culture, BUT NOT to be able to force their personal practices onto others,
or to get special rights based on their religion and culture.
The Foreshore and Seabed, Fresh Water, Rivers and Lakes, indigenous Flora and Fauna etc should be a commons; owned jointly by all Citizens.
All Settlements, are actually Statutes, and future Governments cannot bound by them.
“No Government, can bind future Governments”
This is a foundational basis of the Westminster System of Government, no matter what iwi, and some politicians claim.
While some settlement arrangements may be justifies, any clauses giving special or superior rights based on race, are NOT compatible with DEMOCRACY, and should not have been passed into Law by Parliament.
All un-democratic clauses giving special rights, appointed voting powers, or prior consultation etc, based on Ancestry, NEED TO BE REPEALED.
Also note how the Judiciary and Law schools, have wandered well outside their mandate to APPLY the Law as passed by Parliament.
Tikanga CANNOT be, and never was Law as developed, over the Centuries, in Europe.
Now in 2026, we are in the 2nd quarter of the 21st Century.
Wake Up New Zealand; let’s NOT revert to Tribalism and the Stone Age.
Let’s have a REAL 21st Century Democracy.
Let’s have a “Revolution of Democracy”.
For centre right voters, there is a real danger that the Maori ethnocracy issue -which is dividing NZ and damaging our democracy - could be sidelined during pre-election debates. National will seek to focus on an " improving economy " and "controlling the cost of living"
to attract voters.
But the He Puapua agenda will continue - either openly or by stealth. So protecting NZ's democracy must not be ignored.
Are listening Luxon ?
Are you reading any of this ?
Will someone on his staff or Cabinet please have the temerity to make him face these issues ?
Peter @ 11:22. Dead right, Peter. This has been going on for 40 years now.
We are the slow boiled frog !
Anon 2.14pm - Expecting Luxon to acknowledge any of this is about as much use as expecting Albo in Oz to acknowledge that a Royal Commission into the Bondi massacre is necessary. There is none so blind as he who will not see!In other words: Wilful ignorance is the deepest form of blindness.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.