Rightly so.
But National's approach, as is usually the case with centre-right parties, is user-pays.
It's a way to get revenue without appearing to tax-grab your starving constituents.
Yesterday it was whacking a new tax on our power bills in order to make them cheaper - we hope.
Last week they scrapped the full driver licence test but then NZTA came out and said they may need increase fees for the first test and other bits to make up costs.
We'll pay tolls to get the roads we want. We're about to get hit with congestions charging.
International tourists pay the tourists' tax. Domestic tourists pay to use DOC huts and, more recently, carparks at peak places.
Wellington will probably soon get a targeted special rate for pumping their number twos into the Cook Strait.
Now, so long as this stuff is ring-fenced, I prefer things are charged this way because if you don't want to use a toll road, use a taxed one.
User pays make more sense and is fairer to those who use, and more importantly, those who don't use a particular good or service.
But at some point, your household budget is hit with so many fees and charges that you have to stop and ask how long it can continue.
It's death by a thousand cuts.
And then you ask, can't the government cut wasteful spending elsewhere to cover some of this stuff or give me some back in tax?
In case you needed examples of that, this week, Shane Jones' half-billion slush funds would be a good place to start, I would've thought.
Ryan Bridge is a New Zealand broadcaster who has worked on many current affairs television and radio shows. He currently hosts Newstalk ZB's Early Edition - where this article was sourced.

3 comments:
They could get rid of half the public service tomorrow and very few of us would notice any change to anything....but the ridiculous cost of the public service would drop.
The private sector might pick up a little bit because some of these folks might start a business....oh wait they can't because we're taxing businesses to death with all these ridiculous taxes to pay for our over bloated public service
Prime Minister Ryan Bridge has a nice ring (steady) to it.
Responding to Anon 9.42, he may not have noticed that nurses are public servants. Teachers are public servants. And so are members of the police and those folk who put out fires. So are the staff of the passport office and their colleagues who check the passprts at the border. Those who run the elections and those who approve your social welfare benefits. Get rid of half those public servants and I suggest Anon 9.42 along with the rest of "us" would be very quick to notice the change. And complain. Because the Anon 9.42s of this world don't really comprehend how the country works, or actually care, so long as they have a platform for their ridiculous hyperbole. So come on 9.42. Tell us which specific public servants you would fire? And why? Then we might take you seriously.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.