Guest Post by Bill Chambers on No Minister
There are hundreds of preferential “provisions” along with 96 Acts of Parliament favouring Maori over all other New Zealanders. So, you must surely be asking yourself how fair is that … and WHY would such a blatant apartheid regime have ever been allowed to come about.
Well, this country has been taken down by the biggest fraudulent scam ever known. Due entirely to the fact that Activists are inherently greedy.
And due also, to the fact that many Politicians are inherently unscrupulous. So, the desire for power is what causes them to betray the “rights” of the majority. While at the same time, allowing our country’s democracy to be destroyed.
The entire shameful rort is based firstly on the ever expanding acceptance of Maori being INDIGENOUS to New Zealand. Which is most definitely not true. (Under this falsity, Maori could have the right to separate self-rule … through their own political and legal systems. And also separate education, health, and housing (all funded by the State) with entitlement to much of NZ’s land; and all key natural resources from which income is derived. And including the push for intellectual “rights” on property, genetics, and all living species in the country – both native and introduced.)
Then, whilst Article 1. of the Treaty is clearly about the Maori Chiefs ceding SOVEREIGNTY to the British Crown, Activists have misinterpreted it as meaning they did not. That is a straight out lie. Being told by Maori as part of the trickery to assert self-determination. With the riches that scenario would entail.
And where in Article 2. Maori are guaranteed ownership of their lands, there is the additional word “PROPERTY” which was referring to personal belongings and precious treasures (taonga) which has now been deviously misconstrued as meaning underground minerals, iron sands, plant life, wildlife, water, and even the sky (airwaves).
So, the sky’s the limit as far as their claims go. You name it, they’ll claim it … if there is easy money to be gained.
Then in Article 3. the focus is on EQUALITY which simply and concisely reads: “a ratou nga tikanga katoa rite tahi”. Meaning: All New Zealanders are equal under the law with the same rights and privileges.
Whereas, fraudsters have twisted that as meaning Maori are meant to have “equitable” outcomes. And by that, they mean doing as well in life as the rest of us, without too much effort on their part. So, once again, with the emphasis on easy money.
Aside from all that, there’s the claim that the Treaty is a “PARTNERSHIP”. Professor Elizabeth Rata has said, quote: “An invented reinterpretation of the Treaty as a ‘partnership’ has been taught to at least two generations of schoolchildren.”
Such indoctrination of our children is scandalous. Nowhere is there even a hint of “partnership” in any version of the Treaty.
Then we have the ludicrous Treaty “PRINCIPLES”. There are absolutely none in the ‘Agreement’. They were dreamed up. And due to being “illusionary” were not defined … so, can mean whatever Maori want them to be. Open slather.
Another part of the scam that we’ve succumbed to, is the claim of rights to “FISHERIES” because a bogus English version of the Treaty wrongly includes that word.
The fact is, the correct “Mother” Draft used for translating into Maori was misplaced until found in 1989 – and it does not mention “fisheries”. Which of course, explains why the word “fisheries” is not in the Treaty written in Te Reo.
But, Maori choose to ignore what is the “official” treaty Document, in favour of the false English version, because it means they‘re able to claim exclusive harvesting rights. And, have been granted huge tonnages of quota. Plus, been gifted major shareholdings in New Zealand fishing Companies. Thus, yet another rort.
Aside from fisheries, the word “FORESTS” was also wrongly included in the bogus English copy of the Treaty.
Whereas, that word is not in the genuine Draft … which likewise, explains why “Forests” is not in the Te Reo Treaty Document either.
Yet, it is now deviously being taken as meaning Maori should be handed the ownership of our entire DoC Estate! Hence, another example of an ongoing attempt at takeover of what they have no legitimate “right”.
CONCLUSION: A lot of people still won’t want to accept that so many aspects have been twisted to advantage Maori. They’ll be asking how fraud of such magnitude could possibly have been enabled to occur.
Well, after the Activist’s first victorious scam in the 1970’s was accepted by unscrupulous Politicians, mercenary Lawyers, hero Judges, woke University Professors, PC Historians, despising bureaucrats, and biased Media … the Radicals soon learnt that it’s easy to get what they want by devious manipulation.
And the best bit is that those who have been conned, imagine they came up with it themselves, out of consideration, and in fairness to a race of people who have been oppressed, due to “COLONISATION” (whilst ignoring the overwhelming beneficial aspects, in favour of the very minimal negative effects).
Thus, any misguided guilt is erased by naïvely offering these kind gestures to Maori. With the consequence that the Maori Elite are laughing all the way to the Bank.
But the worst thing about it all, is that having got away with it so easily, they have their sights firmly set on ultimate “CONTROL”. With us being at their mercy.
And they are well and truly on their way to achieving their goal. Because it has reached the stage where they’ll not only be accepted into a future Co-governance agenda, but the seriously frightening bit is that they’ll hold power of ‘VETO’.
For all the gullible people … that means they will have the final say in everything. Thus, ultimate “control” by being able to hold us to ransom. So, wake up folks. Your civil “RIGHTS” are being stripped before your very eyes. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
The entire shameful rort is based firstly on the ever expanding acceptance of Maori being INDIGENOUS to New Zealand. Which is most definitely not true. (Under this falsity, Maori could have the right to separate self-rule … through their own political and legal systems. And also separate education, health, and housing (all funded by the State) with entitlement to much of NZ’s land; and all key natural resources from which income is derived. And including the push for intellectual “rights” on property, genetics, and all living species in the country – both native and introduced.)
Then, whilst Article 1. of the Treaty is clearly about the Maori Chiefs ceding SOVEREIGNTY to the British Crown, Activists have misinterpreted it as meaning they did not. That is a straight out lie. Being told by Maori as part of the trickery to assert self-determination. With the riches that scenario would entail.
And where in Article 2. Maori are guaranteed ownership of their lands, there is the additional word “PROPERTY” which was referring to personal belongings and precious treasures (taonga) which has now been deviously misconstrued as meaning underground minerals, iron sands, plant life, wildlife, water, and even the sky (airwaves).
So, the sky’s the limit as far as their claims go. You name it, they’ll claim it … if there is easy money to be gained.
Then in Article 3. the focus is on EQUALITY which simply and concisely reads: “a ratou nga tikanga katoa rite tahi”. Meaning: All New Zealanders are equal under the law with the same rights and privileges.
Whereas, fraudsters have twisted that as meaning Maori are meant to have “equitable” outcomes. And by that, they mean doing as well in life as the rest of us, without too much effort on their part. So, once again, with the emphasis on easy money.
Aside from all that, there’s the claim that the Treaty is a “PARTNERSHIP”. Professor Elizabeth Rata has said, quote: “An invented reinterpretation of the Treaty as a ‘partnership’ has been taught to at least two generations of schoolchildren.”
Such indoctrination of our children is scandalous. Nowhere is there even a hint of “partnership” in any version of the Treaty.
Then we have the ludicrous Treaty “PRINCIPLES”. There are absolutely none in the ‘Agreement’. They were dreamed up. And due to being “illusionary” were not defined … so, can mean whatever Maori want them to be. Open slather.
Another part of the scam that we’ve succumbed to, is the claim of rights to “FISHERIES” because a bogus English version of the Treaty wrongly includes that word.
The fact is, the correct “Mother” Draft used for translating into Maori was misplaced until found in 1989 – and it does not mention “fisheries”. Which of course, explains why the word “fisheries” is not in the Treaty written in Te Reo.
But, Maori choose to ignore what is the “official” treaty Document, in favour of the false English version, because it means they‘re able to claim exclusive harvesting rights. And, have been granted huge tonnages of quota. Plus, been gifted major shareholdings in New Zealand fishing Companies. Thus, yet another rort.
Aside from fisheries, the word “FORESTS” was also wrongly included in the bogus English copy of the Treaty.
Whereas, that word is not in the genuine Draft … which likewise, explains why “Forests” is not in the Te Reo Treaty Document either.
Yet, it is now deviously being taken as meaning Maori should be handed the ownership of our entire DoC Estate! Hence, another example of an ongoing attempt at takeover of what they have no legitimate “right”.
CONCLUSION: A lot of people still won’t want to accept that so many aspects have been twisted to advantage Maori. They’ll be asking how fraud of such magnitude could possibly have been enabled to occur.
Well, after the Activist’s first victorious scam in the 1970’s was accepted by unscrupulous Politicians, mercenary Lawyers, hero Judges, woke University Professors, PC Historians, despising bureaucrats, and biased Media … the Radicals soon learnt that it’s easy to get what they want by devious manipulation.
And the best bit is that those who have been conned, imagine they came up with it themselves, out of consideration, and in fairness to a race of people who have been oppressed, due to “COLONISATION” (whilst ignoring the overwhelming beneficial aspects, in favour of the very minimal negative effects).
Thus, any misguided guilt is erased by naïvely offering these kind gestures to Maori. With the consequence that the Maori Elite are laughing all the way to the Bank.
But the worst thing about it all, is that having got away with it so easily, they have their sights firmly set on ultimate “CONTROL”. With us being at their mercy.
And they are well and truly on their way to achieving their goal. Because it has reached the stage where they’ll not only be accepted into a future Co-governance agenda, but the seriously frightening bit is that they’ll hold power of ‘VETO’.
For all the gullible people … that means they will have the final say in everything. Thus, ultimate “control” by being able to hold us to ransom. So, wake up folks. Your civil “RIGHTS” are being stripped before your very eyes. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
8 comments:
If I sell you my car, then under the terms of the contract, you get the car and I receive the price. But if you are Maori, the Waitangi Tribunal are likely to say we need to follow the "principles". I've got to pay for your petrol, chauffeur you around for ever, and when the car is no longer usable, I've got to buy you a new one. Then the Supreme Court will say that tikanga applies. As traditionally practiced, that means that if you want my car, you just take it without paying. But I've also got to pay you compensation.
This all sounds ridiculous when talking about cars, but it is what is happening with our country.
Disgraceful what is happening to our country. Govt need to get on with it and DO more.
I will never support a 4 year term, the only time they do anything is in election year.
Its all happening largely under the nose of a large portion of voters.
The MSM have alot to answer for.
How can the English version be used at all. International law is quiet clear, where there is a difference in treaties, the version in the local language takes precedence. So the waitangi tribunal doesn't follow the law.
Well surprise surprise.
The international Law of Treaties never applied to the ToW. Then, as now, a treaty under international law can only be concluded between sovereign entities. Despite the 1835 Declaration, there was only one, as there was no 'federal' govt for all of the North Island (and the SI wasn't included anyway).
The International Court of Justice held in 2002 that the hundreds of treaties concluded between the British Empire and tribal 'strong men' in Africa during the 19thC had no legitimacy in international law then or now as it was impossible to identify the sovereign nations on the African side. I rather think they would apply the same reasoning to the ToW.
This is one of the best critiques of the status quo that I have read of late. A number of succinct truths and nothing but the truth. It reflects my own analysis carried out since I became aware of the absolute dog's breakfast that our NZ politicians have made over the last 50 years or so. Few seem to have any desire to admit, let alone rectify the errors of the past. Names like Palmer, Finlayson, etc. simply make me feel annoyance at their complete ineptitude and duplicity. This piece could be put right in front of our Parliamentarians and the majority would be completely unable to either analyse it or comprehend the logic since most have succumbed to the brainwashing. Sigh!
Given the success to date of these duplicitous tactics, it would be foolish to think that tribal rule would be gentle when He Puapua is installed in 2040. Open season ahead.
The crux of this excellent contribution is in the first paragraph - " 96 Acts of Parliament favouring Maori". why Why WHY?
If PM Luxon and National had the spine to answer this issue, the fortitude to remove from NZ law all of the Maori preferential provisions, they would achieve unprecedented status. Otherwise they may lose governance .
The coalition would survive without National.
The first step to rectify this imbalance is to have a Govt with the gonads to change it, and it seems at present there is only one political party who qualifies. The really good news is we have an election in Nov. So we have to ensure that our two votes go to the right party. Over to you, voters. Our children's future is at stake here
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.