Brooke van Velden, who drove it, was so concerned about the mistake made around Covid vaccine advice for 12–17-year-olds, and the fact Chris Hipkins said he didn’t see any advice, when in fact he did.
She went off to seek advice as to what to do.
They told her what you would expect they would, which was, roughly, you could do a lot, do a bit, or do nothing.
The trouble with Royal Commissions is once they are done, they are done, and launching yet another inquiry, she rightly decided, would be wasting everyone's time.
So she has passed it off to the Health Minister, and we stand by.
The tricky thing here is accountability: will there ever be any?
Hipkins and Bloomfield, the two critical players here, never turned up in person to the Commission. Once the mistake was discovered, that the paperwork on the vaccine did get to Hipkins in Cabinet, no one seems to want to know anything about it.
The head of the inquiry, Grant Illingworth KC, doesn’t answer questions. "The report can speak for itself," he tells everyone. Hipkins relied on the faulty report to say he never saw anything, even though he did, and Bloomfield refuses all comment.
I go back to my original request; that the Government do things properly, which was an adversarial inquiry i.e. they had the power to force people to turn up. Because when they don’t and the Q&A is all back and forward on paper, look what happens.
And what does happen? Well, nothing, clearly.
I'm happy to be proven wrong, but what is the Health Minister going to do? What happens to Hipkins or Bloomfield, apart from nothing?
Mistakes were made in Covid, so we have two Commissions. Commission one is a whitewash, Commission two missed critical detail, so more mistakes are made.
Does that give you confidence that the next time we have an epidemic we are any better off?
Of course not.
So as we await the so-called response, what was the point?
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings - where this article was sourced.
The trouble with Royal Commissions is once they are done, they are done, and launching yet another inquiry, she rightly decided, would be wasting everyone's time.
So she has passed it off to the Health Minister, and we stand by.
The tricky thing here is accountability: will there ever be any?
Hipkins and Bloomfield, the two critical players here, never turned up in person to the Commission. Once the mistake was discovered, that the paperwork on the vaccine did get to Hipkins in Cabinet, no one seems to want to know anything about it.
The head of the inquiry, Grant Illingworth KC, doesn’t answer questions. "The report can speak for itself," he tells everyone. Hipkins relied on the faulty report to say he never saw anything, even though he did, and Bloomfield refuses all comment.
I go back to my original request; that the Government do things properly, which was an adversarial inquiry i.e. they had the power to force people to turn up. Because when they don’t and the Q&A is all back and forward on paper, look what happens.
And what does happen? Well, nothing, clearly.
I'm happy to be proven wrong, but what is the Health Minister going to do? What happens to Hipkins or Bloomfield, apart from nothing?
Mistakes were made in Covid, so we have two Commissions. Commission one is a whitewash, Commission two missed critical detail, so more mistakes are made.
Does that give you confidence that the next time we have an epidemic we are any better off?
Of course not.
So as we await the so-called response, what was the point?
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings - where this article was sourced.
5 comments:
Mike has misread the substance. As usual.
22 recommendations came from the review commissioned by NZ First. 22.
How many have been implemented? Is NZ First being transparent about this? Are they interested in putting into place steps to ensure the same mistakes aren’t repeated in the future?
Crickets. Nothing has been done by the government about the recommendations.
Have we been had by more Peters virtue signalling!
Mistakes were not made Mike. They were acts of commission, or omission, as the case may be. And it’s worth noting, when crimes are committed at the highest levels of govt, who is left to prosecute them?
Not surprising then at all that Brooke van Velden (individually of far more worth than the vast majority of MPs) is soon to be 'retiring' in her mid-30's from politics. The 'blob' that is Wellington politics seems utterly immune from accountability, and remorseless to boot.
How hard is it to do one of the recommendations? It would be a start. I’m having second thoughts about this government, it’s all talk and no action.
It's only peoples' lives, I guess.
Ameni
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.