In 1917, two girls, 16-year-old Elsie
Wright and her 10-year-old cousin Frances Griffiths, presented a local English
newspaper with photographs of themselves in the company of fairies and a gnome.
In modern parlance, the story went viral: the media and the public nationwide gobbled
it up with fascinated delight. More pictures followed. ‘Spiritists’ – a period term
alluding to spirit mediums, clairvoyants and the like – including the New
Zealander Geoffrey Hodson, who died in 1983 at the age of 96, converged on the
girls. Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, wrote a letter
expressing belief in the girls’ account.
Even in 1917, these pictures were easily
identifiable as phoney. The little gnome is obviously a model of some sort,
possibly a cardboard or paper cut-out. The angelic little figures prancing
around Frances in the second picture are just as obviously the product of an
artistic hand. Photography had been around for some time by then and the
production of composite pictures (pictures made by superimposing images) was
nothing new – by a remarkable coincidence, Elsie worked at a local
photographer’s where she made composites for grieving families containing
images of men who had just fallen in the Great War. The affair came to be known
as the Cottingley Fairies. It was such a transparent hoax that no-one should
have been sucked in. What on earth was going on?
Answer: the world was going mad, and the
hoax tapped into that madness. Young men were being sent in human waves against
fortified positions to be mown down like so many blades of grass by machinegun
fire. Legend has it that the telegram boys sometimes brought the feared
official envelopes in a wheelbarrow and would start at one end of a working-class
suburb and methodically make their way to the other, followed by the sound of
wailing as they delivered their grim harbingers of horrendous injury and death
to every second household. It’s not far from the truth in the aftermath of some
major engagements, such as the Somme – where Conan Doyle had lost his son. And all
for what? Whatever the survivors may have convinced themselves of and told us
decades later, it was a war without a purpose, a war in which men had no idea other
than the most nebulous what they were killing and dying for. ‘Spiritists’ were
flat out putting bereaved people ‘in contact’ with their beloved fallen sons, brothers
and husbands ‘on the other side’. Some of these people were genuine in their
beliefs, but there was no shortage of shysters to capitalise on the mass
hysteria either, and they made a packet.
In the midst of all this insanity come two innocent
young girls with pictures of themselves in the company of surreal little winged
figures and an innocuous little gnome. The ‘purity’ of the depicted scenes contrasted
with the putrid realities of an insane war that was leaving few lives
unblighted. They were a conduit for mass escapism. But when three more pictures
were released two years later, hardly anyone took any notice. The war had
ended, and the madness was subsiding. The girls finally ‘‘fessed up’ on
television in 1976. Not that they needed to.
We are approaching the centenary of the beginning
of the Great War into which the whole (then) British Empire was drawn. Some
will speak of sacrifice and heroism, while others will speak of futile mass
slaughter at the behest of emperors and politicians. I am not getting into any arguments
about that stain on human history. For me, the farce that was the Cottingley
Fairies – that window into the psyche of a war-weary, demented populace
desperately seeking temporary refuge in a puerile fantasy – just about says it
all.
Dr
Barend Vlaardingerbroek is an associate professor of education at the American
University of Beirut. Feedback welcome at bv00@aub.edu.lbn
1 comment:
I really enjoyed reading this. Thank you for your insight.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.