The question posed by regular columnist
Colin James (Otago Daily Times 15 March 2016) – ‘Is dairying too big to fail’ -
is one of the more bizarre questions
or comments written by a person described as a leading social and political commentator.
To furthe r suggest as James does, that
a very junior Minister in Nathan Guy, commenting that he is hoping to see a
doubling of primary exports by 2025, as a part cause of the
current dairy downturn is an extraordinary claim. I would doubt that the dairy industry or indeed any othe r primary industry takes a blind bit of notice of
a very junior minister talking up his portfolio.
To fur
The parliamentary opposition demand
Actually Mr. Little,
There is no possibility of the dairy industry failing any time soon. Yes, the current severe down turn in dairy returns will
result in some as yet unknown percentage of dairy farmers exiting the industry, but the
industry itself will carry on. It will not fail.
Comments from Colin James can be simply
dismissed as a little knowledge being extremely dangerous thing and regretfully
contributing to the already too
negative perceptions surrounding this industry.
Those
of us with some years of farming experience will recall all farming went
through much more difficult times during the
1980s and most survived. During that period, farm values halved. First mortgage
interest rates were anything between 20-30%. Currently such interest rates are
around 5% with overdraft rates around 7%.
Huge capital sums of indebtedness of many farmers sums were written off
by the banks during the 80s creating distortions that were never dreamed
of.
“War” stories still abound of how rural
families survived those incredible difficult times, but it was the distortions created by the
so called “debt restructuring’ that caused seething resentment amongst those
who were regarded as too secure to receive any assistance. Some of those who
were ‘restructured’ went on to purchase more land a year or so later.
The current Minister of Finance is quite
correct to make it clear that the re
will be no bail out this time.
All primary industries are subject to
cyclical price pressures due to a host of reasons beyond our control – both up
and down. It is also reasonable to state that rural industries come out the othe r
end as far stronger industries after down turns.
Nobody could describe sheep farming as a
successful growth industry yet it continues to generate export income for the country - despite tearing each othe r to pieces to achieve market share.
The kiwi fruit industry all but collapsed recently due to a virus (PSA) decimatingthe crop. That industry is recovering and is tipped
to soon reach record returns.
The apple industry - predicted to fold its tent and move offthe land after prices
crashed and monopoly exporter ( ENZA ) was opened up to competition - now
appears to be going from strength to strength. Apple exports are anticipated to
reach a record 900 million dollars this season – up from 700 million last year.
Eventhe small goat industry has
transformed itself from the time of
almost total collapse.
The cherry industry has also metthe
challenge of climatic and price difficulties and appears to be headed to record
anothe r very successful season. All
have met the challenge of hard times
and seem to be the better for it.
The kiwi fruit industry all but collapsed recently due to a virus (PSA) decimating
The apple industry - predicted to fold its tent and move off
Even
The cherry industry has also met
It needs to be fully understood that one of
the crucial roles of Government is
to talk up confidence in the economy
and the refore industry, regardless
of the actual economic reality the country faces.
If dairy farmers or any othe r business people make decisions to expand the ir business through debt on the strength of a press statement or a TV interview from
the PM on the
state of the economy - who is to
blame? Most farmers I know would suggest that taking investment advice from
politicians is, well, to put it politely - not very smart. It often comes down
to timing and overseas events which the
industry has no control over. The
performance of Fonterra is however anothe r
issue for anothe r day.
Gerry Eckhof is a retired farmer.
4 comments:
Just another example of an out of touch politician with no common sense suggesting we encourage greed.
Gerry demonstrates the wisdom of someone who actually knows what hes talking about in stark contrast to what passes for the main stream media these days who write vacuous commentary without the faintest effort to fact check any thing they write
John Third
I do have some sympathy for the farmers but none whatever for Fonterra. They provide a very good example of how profligate the financial/bureaucratic(parasitic?)side of business can be. Their behaviour - demanding discounts and special terms of payment is indicative of their bloated sense of entitlement.
Auntie Podes.
I like Antipodes comments. When you pay a CEO over $4 million in salary you expect (a) a better anticipation of dairy trends and (b) better performance of the company. I've asked this before. What does a CEO earning over $4 million do better than the same CEO earning say $500,000? Lots of wasted money.
There is also supply and demand. It is a trend of economics as demand increases prices rise. When supply exceeds demand, at auction, prices drop. This has been shown in our primary industries frequently. Plenty of sheep, the price of lamb and wool diminishes. Plenty of beef the price of beef diminishes. Plenty of butter, the price for butter fat drops. Alumunium was once a precious metal; when it became popular to purchase and manufacture the price went down. What is so hard to understand about that?
Nice for farmers and Fonterra to be optimistic; but were they a little out of touch with reality. I think so.
Should the government bail out farmers? I hope not. Politically it would be in their favour. After all most dairy farmers are New Zealanders. They have paid their taxes and contributed a lot to the New Zealand economy. They are actually more deserving than Rio Tinto was. Rio Tinto begged poor prices for aluminium and got a $30 million bail out. Government reasoning was they provide jobs for Southlanders. Don't dairy farmers also provide jobs for Southlanders and contribute much more to the New Zealand economy than a Swiss conglomerate?
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.