Maori monarch flexes muscle to
make waterways off-limits but we muse on the matter of legality.
The Waikato and Waipa
Rivers have been declared off limits during Level 3 of
the Covid-19 emergency, prohibiting food gathering and all recreational
activities on the waterways..
Elsewhere
around the country people have been barred from going to some beaches by
vigilante groups who set up checkpoints to impede the public.
In
the case of the two rivers, the prohibition has been imposed by a former truck
driver who now rejoices in the title of Māori King Tuheitia.
He
has declared the rivers are subject to a rahui, a cultural and spiritual
prohibition. It came into effect on Monday.
The
king’s authority to make a rahui binding on anyone who feels they should not be
constrained by it is dubious.
Point of Order hoped
Local Government New Zealand would guide us on King Tuheitia’s entitlement to
bar people from swimming or fishing in the rivers or boating on them.
In
our email to LGNZ, we noted that rahui are increasingly being placed on or
within public places – around the Bay of Plenty coast after the catastrophic
White Island eruption, for example.
We
wanted to know:
1. What support do local authorities give to prohibitions imposed
on people’s lawful activities by unelected Maori?
2. Are local authorities obliged to sanction or permit rahui?
3. Are local authorities required to help police them?
4. And if so, which statutes underpin these obligations on local
authorities?
The response was –
My feeling on this one is that it isn’t something the council is
involved with. Speaking with a member of our team, they advise that
generally councils have no role in monitoring or enforcing rāhui however a
range of legislative powers such as safety bylaws and maritime provisions are
available to councils and other authorities and can be invoked with parallel
effect, on a case-by-case basis.
We
were advised there’s a river authority that typically makes decisions around
the Waikato river and it has a statute granting it powers.
According
to the Waikato
Times, Kīngitanga spokesman Rahui Papa said the
rāhui was declared in response to the coronavirus crisis
and is aimed at protecting the rivers.
Hmm.
Is he suggesting waterways are vulnerable to the virus, too?
Perhaps
not. It’s more a matter of the rivers needing a bit of rest and
recreation.
“It is about informing the people and letting everyone know
that, actually, because the waterways are a source of spiritual inspiration for
our people, they need time to recover too,” Papa said.
And:
“We don’t want to cut off the relationship with the river but we
think the river needs time to rejuvenate and regenerate its spiritual self as
well,” Papa said.
No
specific date has been decided for when the rāhui will be lifted.
In
the absence of that information, it would be comforting to know what test the
waterways must pass before the king deems them fit to become recreational playgrounds
again.
In
other words, what measures will be applied to demonstrate to him – and anybody
who asks – that they have been rejuvenated?
The Waikato Times report
did not explore the legalities of the Maori monarchical muscle-flexing.
It did say:
Territorial authorities and the Waikato River Authority have
been informed of the rāhui. Marae and kaumātua along the river have been asked
to help ensure the rāhui is respected. The prohibition applies to the entire
lengths of the Waikato and Wāipa rivers.
Not
surprisingly many citizens hoping to enjoy the advantages of the extra
recreation allowed under Level 3 are bewildered.
The Waikato Times today reports:
Fish and Game
Auckland Waikato fisheries manager Adam Daniel said he received a number of
enquiries from confused fishing club members after hearing
of the rāhui.
He said a number of fishers were frustrated they could not fish
on the river yet, as the Government had said they were allowed to do so in
alert level 3.
“We were very excited because everyone has cabin fever, there’s
a lot of mental health issues around being locked up and this would give people
a great opportunity to get out there,” he said.
“We were hoping the
river would be part of a recovery for people, to nourish and sustain people
that might be out of work, where they could go down and catch fish.“
Curiously, the report goes on to say:
While Fish and Game
did not have legal power to enforce a rāhui, the organisation
was directing anglers to Waikato-Tainui if they had questions.
Does
this mean Waikato-Tainui has the legal power to enforce it?
Elsewhere
around the country (according to Newshub) the Police
… have been forced to take action after a flurry of fresh
complaints about unlawful community roadblocks in Northland.
The complaints centre around rural beach access roads in
isolated communities in the Far North, where residents have been putting
roadblocks in place to stop people from accessing the beach.
While the roadblocks had a legitimate function during the alert
level 4 lockdown – helping uphold the rules during a period in which all
non-essential travel was banned – at alert level 3, which came into force on
Tuesday, Kiwis are permitted to drive to their closest beach.
The
Prime Minister and the Police have responded to Point of
Order’s questions about the legality of Maori community
checkpoints but without specifying the statutory authority that might make them
legal.
The
Minister of Police, Stuart Nash, has simply ignored the email with the
questions we sent to him.
The
checkpoints seem to be regulated not by any statute but by some form of Police
edict:
Police last week clarified its rules on
community COVID-19 roadblocks after the furore surrounding these and other
incidents.
“Police and other agencies remain responsible for ensuring that
people comply with the restrictions under the different COVID-19 alert levels,”
Police Commissioner Andrew Coster said.
The
clarification means checkpoints must now have a police presence and must not
restrict access for people moving through for legitimate purposes – which,
under alert level 3, includes travel to the beach.
It’s
a fair bet it includes travel to the Waikato and Waipa Rivers, too.
Bob Edlin is a veteran journalist and editor
for the Point of Order blog HERE.
3 comments:
Maori have seen how easily we have accepted these road blockades and observed imposed race based rahuis, don't expect this behavior to end any time soon. In fact, wouldn't be surprised to see more of this behavior in the future.
As to the Waikato and Waipa rivers, what is the maori view regarding the Waikato power station using river water. Some koha accepted maybe?
I seem to recall that the Waikato river has been given legal status or by maori,as a "person" (I stand to be corrected on this) If this is correct, have maori asked the river if it wants their help? probably not.
You didn't stand up to linear history when you could. That ended in N Z in 1984 when Labour politicians pledged sovereign powers to the Waitangi Tribunal. And the entire country was asleep over it, except for a few, including me. Now cultural relativism has taken over, which means anything a power group says it is and can terrorise everyone else. Parts of the North Island are going to become off limit for normal life and I don't mean because of Coronavirus.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.