The Rotorua District Council (Representation Arrangement) Bill proposes, among other things, to create a Maori ward and a general ward both electing three councilors. There are 21,700 voters on the Maori roll and 55,600 voters on the general roll. My vote will be worth 39% of a vote in the Maori ward.
There are six provisions in our law that are so important for democracy that they can only be changed by the vote of 75 percent in parliament or by a majority in a referendum. One is clause 36 of the Electoral Act that guarantees everyone regardless of race has an equal vote.
The Attorney-General, Hon David Parker, has advised parliament that “the Bill appears to limit the right to be free from discrimination affirmed in s 19 of the Bill of Rights Act and cannot be justified under s 5 of that Act.”
The principle of all votes having equal value is in the Local Government Act. The Local Government Commission advised the council how to set up wards that are proportional.
The Mayor, Steve Chadwick, on whose casting vote this local bill was proposed, has given three reasons for unequal voting.
First, “The Community wants it”. There has been no referendum or poll to suggest the voters of Rotorua want unequal votes.
Second, “Te Tiriti o Waitangi’. If parliament accepting the treaty requires unequal voting in Rotorua then it follows that Maori everywhere, in every election, should get a vote worth 61% more.
Third, “the spirit and intent of the Rotorua Township (Fenton) Agreement”. Te Arawa made generous land donations in order to establish the town. The settlement does not justify these proposed unequal voting rights. Rotorua receives massive assistance from the taxpayer starting with the rebuilding of the town after the Tarawera eruption. There is a reason why the park in the city is called the government gardens.
Then there is “no taxation without representation”. The general roll voters provide most of the Council’s rates.
Labour, Green and Maori Party MPs voted for this bill. The Minister of Māori Development Willie Jackson says democracy in 2022 is “broader and more expansive than just one person, one vote”. He says Labour’s agenda is to expand co-governance.
Willie says we “have nothing to fear." We need to be very afraid. There is a name for giving different voting power on the basis of race. It is call apartheid.
To avoid local bills being party politics the convention is the MP representing the headquarters of a local body is always in charge of a local bill. As MP for Auckland Central I have introduced more local bills than any MP currently in parliament.
If I had been asked to present this bill I would have advised it is an abuse of parliament’s procedure to seek to change our constitution by way of a local bill. If the council insisted, I would have presented the bill, set out the council’s case and then recommended parliament reject the bill.
At the urging of the Mayor, Steve Chadwick, a former Labour MP, the Council bypassed the local MP Hon Todd McClay and asked Tamati Coffey, a Labour list MP to be in charge of the bill. Mr Coffey was defeated by the locals. He represents the Labour party in parliament and not Rotorua.
Local Bills are usually referred to the Local Bills Committee. Mr. Coffey is abusing his power as the member in charge to nominate the Maori Affairs Committee which he chairs. He has tried to race it through. It is reported the chair is cutting off witnesses who say the bill is racist.
A proper examination of the bill will reveal anomalies. I have neighbours on the Maori roll who are not from Rotorua. Many local Maori are on the general roll. Some Maori will get a more valuable vote than other Maori.
Today in Rotorua there are many Maori councilors. The council rushed to introduce Maori wards before doing their math. Now they realise Maori wards may reduce Maori representation. The council will not repeal their decision to introduce Maori wards because the agenda was always co-governance.
Having unequal voting will not solve Rotorua’s real issues. Here is one. The Labour government has filled our motels with the homeless from all over the Central North Island. There are enough children in our motels to fill a primary school. Borders are reopening. Where are Rotorua’s tourists to stay?
The principle of all votes having equal value is in the Local Government Act. The Local Government Commission advised the council how to set up wards that are proportional.
The Mayor, Steve Chadwick, on whose casting vote this local bill was proposed, has given three reasons for unequal voting.
First, “The Community wants it”. There has been no referendum or poll to suggest the voters of Rotorua want unequal votes.
Second, “Te Tiriti o Waitangi’. If parliament accepting the treaty requires unequal voting in Rotorua then it follows that Maori everywhere, in every election, should get a vote worth 61% more.
Third, “the spirit and intent of the Rotorua Township (Fenton) Agreement”. Te Arawa made generous land donations in order to establish the town. The settlement does not justify these proposed unequal voting rights. Rotorua receives massive assistance from the taxpayer starting with the rebuilding of the town after the Tarawera eruption. There is a reason why the park in the city is called the government gardens.
Then there is “no taxation without representation”. The general roll voters provide most of the Council’s rates.
Labour, Green and Maori Party MPs voted for this bill. The Minister of Māori Development Willie Jackson says democracy in 2022 is “broader and more expansive than just one person, one vote”. He says Labour’s agenda is to expand co-governance.
Willie says we “have nothing to fear." We need to be very afraid. There is a name for giving different voting power on the basis of race. It is call apartheid.
To avoid local bills being party politics the convention is the MP representing the headquarters of a local body is always in charge of a local bill. As MP for Auckland Central I have introduced more local bills than any MP currently in parliament.
If I had been asked to present this bill I would have advised it is an abuse of parliament’s procedure to seek to change our constitution by way of a local bill. If the council insisted, I would have presented the bill, set out the council’s case and then recommended parliament reject the bill.
At the urging of the Mayor, Steve Chadwick, a former Labour MP, the Council bypassed the local MP Hon Todd McClay and asked Tamati Coffey, a Labour list MP to be in charge of the bill. Mr Coffey was defeated by the locals. He represents the Labour party in parliament and not Rotorua.
Local Bills are usually referred to the Local Bills Committee. Mr. Coffey is abusing his power as the member in charge to nominate the Maori Affairs Committee which he chairs. He has tried to race it through. It is reported the chair is cutting off witnesses who say the bill is racist.
A proper examination of the bill will reveal anomalies. I have neighbours on the Maori roll who are not from Rotorua. Many local Maori are on the general roll. Some Maori will get a more valuable vote than other Maori.
Today in Rotorua there are many Maori councilors. The council rushed to introduce Maori wards before doing their math. Now they realise Maori wards may reduce Maori representation. The council will not repeal their decision to introduce Maori wards because the agenda was always co-governance.
3 comments:
maybe it is time to rethink the utility of 'list' MPs...
while MMP is a great way to give everyone a voice, perhaps the concept of 'list' MPs should be done away with. if an elected MP (like seymour) does not listen to their constituents, they can be voted out - so the democratic power resides with the public. but list MPs are answerable to party HQ and not to any constituents, which allows them to get away with such nonsense. in order to ensure the seats via MMP has voting power in parliament, the party HQ can send their yes/no/abstain that applies to all those 'party' seats (it is rare that a list MP votes against the party diktat anyway).
think of all the wages and related savings if only 60 MPs actually need to be paid.
By Jove Annon
I think your onto it
The comment by Willie Jackson that “the tyranny of the majority” is not a modern approach should of been signalled as a major issue in the media and puts on notice all New Zealanders that our country is at serious risk of becoming an apartheid state. The very thing we fought against in the 1980s.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.