Just think about it, how is that possible? Everyone was forecasting 3.1 or 3 percent, down from 3.2 percent.
Why? Because given what we know about work and the desperate shortage of skills and massive demand for labour, how is it possible we have so many people jobless and yet not able to find a single day's work?
Surely, in hospitality as it reopens, or timber yards that are selling everything they can get their hands on, there is a bit of work about the place the last of the jobless can fill?
But no, the headline number went from 3.2 percent to 3.2 percent. Surely that means we have hit bedrock. And surely anyone with half a brain can see the desperate need to get some borders open, some visas issued, and some migrants into the country.
What was also contained in the figures was the wage inflation. It's up 4.8 percent for hourly earnings and 5.7 percent for average weekly earnings. These are sort of good numbers because given the cost-of-living crisis, you need every extra cent you can get your hands on.
But they are only up by that much because of the critical labour shortage. Adding to the misery is even though they are up that much they still don’t cover inflation, so you are still going backwards.
The real tragedy of the wage rises of that size is that they are, of course, adding to the very problem they are trying to solve. If you are paying more because you are making more, selling more, and getting higher returns that’s good. But if you are paying more merely to hold talent so you don’t go bankrupt then that serves no one well in the long run.
As we said yesterday, a low unemployment rate is only any good if it's part of a booming economy. If you are offering work to all who want it through expansion, and as a result of expansion everyone shares in the success with wage increases, that’s your economic sweet spot.
But if you are in a country that doesn't let people in, has an economy that’s stalled because growth is not possible due to lack of staff, but those staff get paid more anyway, then you have a pending disaster.
It's grinding to a halt. It isn't good for anyone. And when your jobless rate doesn’t go down even when there are jobs galore and no one coming in to take them, that is a seriously large red flag.
What was also contained in the figures was the wage inflation. It's up 4.8 percent for hourly earnings and 5.7 percent for average weekly earnings. These are sort of good numbers because given the cost-of-living crisis, you need every extra cent you can get your hands on.
But they are only up by that much because of the critical labour shortage. Adding to the misery is even though they are up that much they still don’t cover inflation, so you are still going backwards.
The real tragedy of the wage rises of that size is that they are, of course, adding to the very problem they are trying to solve. If you are paying more because you are making more, selling more, and getting higher returns that’s good. But if you are paying more merely to hold talent so you don’t go bankrupt then that serves no one well in the long run.
As we said yesterday, a low unemployment rate is only any good if it's part of a booming economy. If you are offering work to all who want it through expansion, and as a result of expansion everyone shares in the success with wage increases, that’s your economic sweet spot.
But if you are in a country that doesn't let people in, has an economy that’s stalled because growth is not possible due to lack of staff, but those staff get paid more anyway, then you have a pending disaster.
It's grinding to a halt. It isn't good for anyone. And when your jobless rate doesn’t go down even when there are jobs galore and no one coming in to take them, that is a seriously large red flag.
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings.
1 comment:
shouldn't unemployment benefits and general welfare payments (except for the old & disabled) be indexed to the unemployment rate? this way, it will increase when unemployment is high (thus supporting people unable to find a job) and decrease when unemployment is low (this incentivising people to look for jobs) - perhaps this can bring some sense of balance.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.