Lani Fogelberg, a young entrepreneur, serves it up the way it is in the Herald on Saturday. It's a must-read, if you missed it.
Depressing because it’s a realistic take on the country as it currently sits. But encouraging because we are seeing, at long last, an increasing series of people speak out on the way we are being led and why we are where we are.
Fogelberg talks of the celebration of the Lotto winner and yet the dissection of the person who grafted for their two million but is suddenly a tall poppy. Free money is good, money worked for is to be taxed and you are to be brought down.
She worries about the brain drain. Don’t we all? She says if she knew what she knows now, she would have quit the country. She is far from alone.
Simon Bridges, by the way, wrote a solid piece last week in the NBR talking about the slow decline of the country. That sums it up well.
It's a pattern. This is not something that occurred to us last week. Some of us have been arguing this for years. It's just that of late in the post-Covidish era, we have the circumstances that exacerbate the demise.
The Lotto winner is celebrated because a Lotto win could be any one of us.
The success story is not so widely celebrated because that isn't universally inclusive. A lot of people, too many people, don’t want to work hard, dream big, chase a goal or strive for greatness. That’s fine, but one of the out-workings for too many is they use that lack of determination as an excuse to bring others down.
That attitude is tragically to be found in too many places in this country.
One of the real crimes is the tone that's set from the top. A government's greatest overarching role is to inspire and lead, to offer opportunity for success, and to forge pathways for growth and excellence.
But this current government doesn’t know how to lead and I don’t even think they like the idea. They encourage the opposite, they reward the loudest noisemaker, scratch the biggest itch, and at times look like they condemn if not outright dislike the grafter and go-getter.
Fogelberg's story is the story of too many. There is no bright future for a country when the successful want out.
Simon Bridges, by the way, wrote a solid piece last week in the NBR talking about the slow decline of the country. That sums it up well.
It's a pattern. This is not something that occurred to us last week. Some of us have been arguing this for years. It's just that of late in the post-Covidish era, we have the circumstances that exacerbate the demise.
The Lotto winner is celebrated because a Lotto win could be any one of us.
The success story is not so widely celebrated because that isn't universally inclusive. A lot of people, too many people, don’t want to work hard, dream big, chase a goal or strive for greatness. That’s fine, but one of the out-workings for too many is they use that lack of determination as an excuse to bring others down.
That attitude is tragically to be found in too many places in this country.
One of the real crimes is the tone that's set from the top. A government's greatest overarching role is to inspire and lead, to offer opportunity for success, and to forge pathways for growth and excellence.
But this current government doesn’t know how to lead and I don’t even think they like the idea. They encourage the opposite, they reward the loudest noisemaker, scratch the biggest itch, and at times look like they condemn if not outright dislike the grafter and go-getter.
Fogelberg's story is the story of too many. There is no bright future for a country when the successful want out.
Mike Hosking is a New Zealand television and radio broadcaster. He currently hosts The Mike Hosking Breakfast show on NewstalkZB on weekday mornings.
3 comments:
if there was a real 'tyranny of democracy', this is it...
Mike....you are getting soft in your commentary. This Government not only have no clue about leadership but are heading down the separatist path with a race based agenda that will screw this country big time. Influences like you and many others need to step up the rhetoric.
Mike I thought you were joshing us with your headline but having read your article I’m not so sure.
Please tell me it is so.
Worse than ever? - Sure.
As bad as ever? - Fine.
But As worse as ever? - Really?
The irony is, since I first saw this I’ve questioned myself, and what it means that I’m struggling to turn a blind eye.
Could this just be part of the new Anything Goes approach?
Maybe you can help me make sense of it?
I feel so worse about even bringing it up but I feel it bester that I do, if just for my own edulification.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.