Pages

Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Point of Order: Govt announces new transport and rental housing initiatives and enthuses about human rights



But without mentioning voting rights

The big announcement from the Beehive so far today is that workers and public transport users are at the heart of a new approach to public transport branded the Sustainable Public Transport Framework.

This is great news, although when you take workers and public transport users out of considerations it is hard to find too many other interested parties, besides politicians and administrators.

Oh, wait. Taxpayers and ratepayers, which accounts for most people, have a stake, too. Their money funds the system and a major change is to allow councils to own and operate services in-house.

Transport Minister Michael Wood said the current model is causing operators to wind back services and timetables, because they can’t get drivers.

“The new Sustainable Public Transport Framework will help to create a public transport system that is reliable, an attractive career opportunity and a credible alternative to using cars to get around.

“Improving the conditions of employees will make it easier to recruit and retain the workforce, allowing frequent and reliable services. This will also provide job security by allowing drivers the opportunity to maintain employment if there is a change in operator.”

The announcement can be found on the Beehive website along with two ministerial speeches delivered in recent days.

One speech – delivered by Phil Twyford at a function to welcome Afghan human rights defenders – inevitably clucked approvingly about human rights, although he did not mention the divisive eccentricities of the electoral rights the government is creating for some people in this country.

The second speech (to an unidentified audience) was delivered by Housing Minister Megan Woods who declared:

“It’s my great pleasure to be able to speak with you about a really positive move for the Build-to-Rent sector.”

The really positive move was that the provision of tax incentives for developers for as long as the homes are held as long-term rentals to encourage more long-term rental options.

Woods said an exemption from the interest limitation rules would be provided for certain types of new and existing build-to-rent developments in perpetuity.

To qualify, developments need to offer tenants leases of at least 10 years.

Tenants can ask for shorter agreements if they wish and the development will still qualify for the exemption. Tenants will be able to break their tenancy agreements at any time, with a 56-day notice period.

“We believe security of tenure is critical for people who are renting. This requirement will enable people to settle and personalise their homes, reduce how often they must find a new place to live and all those associated moving costs, especially as people face cost of living challenges, and help them to build and maintain connection to their community.”

The press statement said the move was being welcomed by Property Council New Zealand.

It quoted council chief executive Leonie Freeman.

“Today’s announcement is one of the best levers to unlocking the potential of Build to Rent,” says Property Council New Zealand Chief Executive Leonie Freeman.

“We support the government’s desire to enable Build to Rent in order to provide warm, dry rental homes that offer Kiwis long-term security of tenure,” Leonie Freeman said.

Legislation to make the changes is expected to be introduced to Parliament at the end of August.

Ministers Michael Wood and Priyanca Radhakrishnan and MPs Vanushi Walters and Dan Rosewarne were in the audience when Phil Twyford welcomed a group of Afghan human rights defenders and family members to New Zealand at a function hosted by the Governor-General at Government House.

The group included human rights advocates, journalists, judges, NGO workers, politicians, an athlete, a doctor, an entrepreneur, public servants.

Twyford recalled Afghanistan’s fall to the Taliban a year ago and the Government’s response, to help evacuate Afghans who assisted, or were otherwise connected with the New Zealand presence in Afghanistan.

Help was extended to those who were promoting human rights, running for political office, competing as an athlete, reporting the news, working in the public service – they were viewed as a threat by the insular and oppressive ideology of the Taliban.

In the upshot, more than 1700 Afghan nationals were resettled, around 200 of them human rights defenders and their families.

Twyford said he hoped that

“… while you make a new life in peace and safety, you can also put your talents, and qualifications to use in building our country Aotearoa-New Zealand. And that is part of the reason I have gathered you all here today.

“We value your passion for human rights, your willingness to speak up, your commitment to the common good. Don’t be shy about expressing those things in your new country, and in working from here for human rights and democracy in Afghanistan.”

Twyford noted that while NZ is far from perfect,

“… gender equality is a core value of our nation. The Taliban’s denial of the rights of women and girls is repugnant to our Government and that will continue to be at the centre of our response to their regime.

“I am moved by the thought that so many talented Afghan women, and your daughters, will have the chance to live freely, seize opportunities for education and work, and live your best lives in our country.”

He invited the new Afghan Kiwis to work with the government in putting human rights at the centre of the country’s nation-building.

He didn’t mention his government’s unmandated push to accord some people greater rights than others – the failed effort to give much more weight to a Māori vote than a non-Māori vote in Rotorua, for example (HERE) and the successful passage of legislation to debase the electoral system by guaranteeing two seats (by appointment only) to represent some citizens in Canterbury based on their genealogy (HERE).

Point of Order is a blog focused on politics and the economy run by veteran newspaper reporters Bob Edlin and Ian Templeton

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

This is concerning for a number of reasons. Once the queen dies, australia and nz will likely look to.becoming republics with our own head of state. In nz this will likely be a maori chief or iwi leader appointed by the govt. If the iwi gain true partnership this will mean 50% iwi and 50% the rest of nz. So, pretty close to a dicatorship in disguise as a tweaked democracy where partial voting still takes place. What will happen to non maori here in terms of property rights? Will we be another zimbabwe where people with pakeha ancestry are seen as having no claim to the land that they have had for many generations? This may sound far fetched but when people are not elected and cannot be thrown out, they can do anything. I fear greatly for the future of nz

Post a Comment

Thanks for engaging in the debate!

Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.