What a depressing read and document Sport New Zealand’s ‘Guiding Principles for the Inclusion of Transgender People in Community Sport’ is.
Underwritten by
their proposed 'overarching principle' that ‘Every New Zealander has
the right to participate in Sport and to be treated with respect, empathy and
positive regard. Transgender people can take part in sports in the gender
they identify with.’
I have no real issue with the first line, other than every participant also has the obligation to treat sport with respect, empathy and positive regard. By trying to ‘muscling in’ on categories to which they don’t and can’t belong too, trans women (men pretending to be women) treat every other participant, coach, volunteer and sport itself disrespectfully, with no empathy and with negative regard.
Community sport
(the vast majority of sport in New Zealand) is being instructed that the
feelings of transgender participants override sport’s basic premise, that
fairness matters.
The science on
the participation of transgender women and girls (biological males) in women’s
sport is extremely clear. They have an unfair advantage whenever they take part
in women’s sport. They do not lose that advantage with testosterone
suppression.
The depressing
part is that Sport NZ’s CEO Raylene Castle, Minister of Sport, Grant Robertson and
anyone who has a modicum of understanding of sport also know the science and
beyond a shadow of a doubt know full well they are sacrificing women and girl’s
sport on the altar of inclusion.
Sport has
numerous protected categories both for fairness and for safety. Sport has
weight categories, age categories as well as girls and boys and women and men.
Some sport is
open to both genders at a young age then separates for obvious reasons before
puberty. A small number of sports are gender neutral throughout e.g. equestrian
events, because the sports decided that for them gender separation isn’t an
issue.
For every trans
girl (biological boy) or trans woman (biological man) included in a result or sports
team a girl or woman loses her place. What the Sport New Zealand Guidelines are
in fact saying are that the feelings of the trans participants matters more
than the rights of all the girls and women who are pushed out of their sport. The
report is telling these women and girls that for them fairness doesn’t matter.
The report
claims that it’s about community sport and not elite sport. This is irrelevant.
No athlete takes up sport and gets picked for a national team. All sports participants
start at a community level. It’s at a community level that the first sporting
steps are taken.
Lisa
Carrington, Valerie Adams, Ruby Tui, Emma Twigg and many more truly great New
Zealand Sportswomen all started life at community sport and worked their way to
the top of their game in women’s sport as a result of many, many years of hard
work, training, successes and disappointments.
How many places
being taken by biological boys in girls’ teams will be too many?
How many girls
will be put off sport for life because of the unfairness of boys taking their
places?
How many
biological boys in a girls’ team is going to be enough for real girls’ teams
not to want to join in?
How many times
will your daughters need to say ‘Mum they’ve got a boy in their team, it’s
not fair?’ before sports bodies agree and make a stand.
Including trans
women and girls isn’t inclusive at any level. It’s exclusive, it’s excluding
all those women and girls whose place in sport is being taken by biological
males. Every James who decides he’s now Jemima and taking part in sport is
taking a deserving girl or woman’s spot.
How ironic in a
year and a nation where women’s sport has so many figureheads and inspirational
teams and individuals that the body set up to ‘look after’ all sport is in fact
doing the opposite.
How ironic that
just a few years ago the same Sport New Zealand was looking at it’s strategy
for women and girls women-and-girls-govt-strategy.pdf
(sportnz.org.nz) ‘Enabling women and girls to
realise their potential in and through sport and active recreation’.
You
will have noticed that there’s no mention of transmen. Jemima’s who change to
James don’t cause unfairness in men’s and boy’s sport that happens the other
way round.
It’s
telling that in the Tokyo Olympics there was a ‘transman’ the former Rebbeca
Quinn in the Canadian team. Now known as Quinn and having had a double
mastectomy (and presumably not taken any of the hormones that would have
prohibited her participation), Quinn was a member of the Canadian Women’s soccer
team. The reality being that if there was a men’s soccer team, Quinn wouldn’t
have been good enough.
Going back to
the Olympics and New Zealand’s shameful first. Selecting Laurel Hubbard wasn’t ‘stunning
and brave’. It was ridiculous.
Bear in mind
that there’s not one person on the selection panel or in the New Zealand
Olympic Committee who didn’t know that Laurel Hubbard had an unfair advantage
in any women’s lifting competition. It was an outrageous joke on our sporting
heritage.
According to
all rules and policies of the International Olympic Committee, the New Zealand
Olympic Committee and NZ Weightlifting Laurel Hubbard ticked all the boxes
necessary to warrant and deserve selection.
Had Laurel been
a biological woman, she should have been picked to the same standards as any
other deserving athlete.
In my view
despite those rules and policies, the selectors should have refused to pick
Laurel. If only they’d had the ‘balls’ (groan) to not pick Laurel. I’ve no
doubt that Laurel could and would have appealed and quite probably the
selection decision would have been overturned at a legal step in the appeals
process. However, a very important point would have been made. It shouldn’t be up to genuine women competing
out there to make this point as happened at the Pacific Games in 2019. If you
scroll down on the link below, you’ll find that picture of the two Samoan
lifters who placed second and third, but should have been first and second, on
the podium with Laurel Hubbard. Transgender weightlifter Hubbard
beats home favourites after driving incident (insidethegames.biz)
High profile
women, current women athletes and others who speak out on this, are bullied,
‘cancelled’ and lose money. Today’s young women at sport in all levels need
their place in girls and women’s sport protected. Women and girls shouldn’t be
driven out of their own category by biological boys and men no matter how they
feel. Fairness matters in sport at all levels.
Reading through
the document it’s clear that the intention is all clubs and participants accept
without question the ‘guidelines’ from Sport New Zealand.
In the long
term this would prove to be a disaster for much of our community sports clubs
and codes that make up the vast majority of the sporting landscape of New
Zealand.
Push back is
needed. Sports Codes should follow the example of Boxing New Zealand and be
honest, clear cut and leave no room for ambiguity. ‘Boxing New Zealand will
stand firm on the gender rules we have at present. We have two gender
categories: one is male, one is female. Boxing New Zealand will not allow any cross-gender
participation in either biological sex category in competition Boxing.’
Sport New
Zealand promote themselves as a guardian (kaitiaki) of sport in our country.
This policy is exactly the opposite. It’s an assault on sport itself.
Sport New Zealand are acting like a dentist who recommends you mouth wash with a sugar laden fizzy drink every night to protect your teeth. Of course no dentist would ever do this, we shouldn’t and mustn’t accept Sport New Zealand’s transgender guidelines. Sport of today and the future needs us to push back.
I’m, Ken Maclaren. I’m a sixty one year old bloke and have a background in sport of more than fifty years. I first went for a run with my Dad in 1971 and have been involved in endurance sport ever since. Over those fifty years I started out in a local club and school team. Twenty years later I competed for Great Britain and Wales for a few years. Now I swim with my pals and jog slowly round the local sports park and occasionally take part in community sport. For twenty five years I coached athletes of all ages and both genders. In future months I’ll be blogging HERE on ways in which sport can push back against this insanity.
3 comments:
incredible that this is being promoted to be 'inclusive', when it's the opposite, because by preventing fairness, it acts against biological females. Not legally exclusive, but has the same effect.
This is a poorly researched and heavily skewed opinion piece, which expresses transphobic views. Can the writer point to the research which provides the so called 'extremely clear' evidence on this topic? This is a nuanced debate which the writer has entirely brushed over. It's a shame that this type of work is pitched alongside quality thought, research and intellectually stimulating prose. Perhaps the writer could try to spell the name of the Sport NZ CE correctly, too. Just a thought.
Sure I can:
Here's one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846503/pdf/40279_2020_Article_1389.pdf
Links to interviews and more will soon be found on https://noxyinxxsport.substack.com/
Apologies to Raelene Castle that was a schoolboy error.
The following podcast (and other episodes from The Real Science of Sport) has many links to studies.
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-lia-thomas-controversy-anger-in-the-age-of/id1461719225?i=1000555113401
Best wishes Ken Maclaren
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.