"Ironically it was the Labour government that, from 1935, introduced the major platforms of the welfare state; it would be another Labour government, 50 years later, which would begin dismantling them .. In line with the ideas of the "New Right", Douglas set out to remove much of the economic safety net that had been built up over the past 50 years".Those lines are incorrect. I challenge Hipkins to defend what's being taught to Kiwi school children about"New Right" policies from 1984-88. If I was a student reading the Right was on a mission to dismantle welfare, then I would not vote for the Right today. Is Hipkins happy to promote misinformation in schools to help him bank votes in Election 2023?
Why is the above quote misinformation? Let's do a fact check. In 1984 when Douglas became Minister of Finance, the NZ Treasury's Fiscal Time Series (1972-2022) reports Social Security & Welfare, Health and Education spending by the government totaled $7.5 billion. By 1988, it was $14.2 billion, almost doubling.
There was high inflation during 1984-88 due to the prior oil shocks so welfare may have been raised to keep up with prices. One way to control for that effect is to calculate how welfare spending changed as a fraction of nominal output. It rose from 20% to 22% of GDP, more than keeping up. However you look at it, the history book is wrong.
What did Douglas do and not do during his tenure as Finance Minister from 1984-88? He did not cut public health. He did not cut education spending, nor cut unemployment benefits. Douglas was known for designing ways to strengthen welfare, not dismantle it. Prior to 1984, he launched the NZ Super Scheme. Had it not been stopped by National, retired Kiwis wouldn't have to worry about their financial needs in retirement now, since it would be worth far more today than the Cullen Fund & Kiwi Saver combined.
Parts of Douglas' plan were (poorly) copied years later by a subsequent government in the form of Kiwi Saver, but he wanted everyone to hold such an account to avoid the situation we have today whereby the bottom 20% of earners don't have one, thereby exacerbating poverty.
Douglas' reforms were labelled "pro-market" due to the following features:
Since Labour's success at the polls relies on associated welfare cuts with "the right", expect Hipkins to stay silent on correcting these mistakes in the NCEA text book.
Sources:
https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/information-release/data-fiscal-time-series-historical-fiscal-indicators
What did Douglas do and not do during his tenure as Finance Minister from 1984-88? He did not cut public health. He did not cut education spending, nor cut unemployment benefits. Douglas was known for designing ways to strengthen welfare, not dismantle it. Prior to 1984, he launched the NZ Super Scheme. Had it not been stopped by National, retired Kiwis wouldn't have to worry about their financial needs in retirement now, since it would be worth far more today than the Cullen Fund & Kiwi Saver combined.
Parts of Douglas' plan were (poorly) copied years later by a subsequent government in the form of Kiwi Saver, but he wanted everyone to hold such an account to avoid the situation we have today whereby the bottom 20% of earners don't have one, thereby exacerbating poverty.
Douglas' reforms were labelled "pro-market" due to the following features:
- Reserve Bank independence with an inflation target
- Floating the Kiwi dollar
- Introducing Goods and Services Tax
- Cutting the top rate of income tax
- Privatization of State Owned Corporations
- Elimination of Subsidies to Farmers
- Deregulation, including the likes of import licenses
Since Labour's success at the polls relies on associated welfare cuts with "the right", expect Hipkins to stay silent on correcting these mistakes in the NCEA text book.
Sources:
https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/information-release/data-fiscal-time-series-historical-fiscal-indicators
Professor Robert MacCulloch holds the Matthew S. Abel Chair of Macroeconomics at Auckland University. He has previously worked at the Reserve Bank, Oxford University, and the London School of Economics. He runs the blog Down to Earth Kiwi from where this article was sourced.
6 comments:
Thank you for this excellent analysis.
I think your last sentence should read:
'Since Labour's success at the polls relies on associating welfare cuts with "the right", expect Hipkins to stay silent on correcting these mistakes in the NCEA text book.'
The history syllabus has been shown to contain numerous distortions and errors of fact. It would seem to be more about indoctrination than education.
And Chippy's past record of spreading misinformation and just downright lying shows why you can't trust a single promise that he's going to make us on all the contentious Labour policies that will supposedly be axed or "improved".
In that respect he is just as bad as Ardern. Both speak with forked tongue.
I trust they do not teach the DPB, unemployment benefit, "disability" benefit, state house qualification, ACC, endless discounts for modest income, etc, otherwise only a few inherently afflicted with a European colonist ethic and most Asian immigrants will be interested in working at all.
Hi Cara
It is very definitely far more about indoctrination than true objective history. Many would have made the point with unquestionable logic in the public submissions but these have been withheld from the public and are not accessible even via the OIA. If submitters had known that was to be the case, I suspect many in education would have ripped into the syllabus, but they refrained, afraid of cancellation when their name published as is normal with submissions to govt. Only the assessors who knew what outcome was required, know what was submitted. Ask Hipkins how many submissions he read directly. It is a propoganda coup which would have impressed Goebells. Ardern certainly listened on her communications course. In his book Edward Jerningham Wakefield recounts how putting one across whitey was a source of considerable mana. And even rumbled attempts attracted mana proportional to audacity. At least until now the mana of the maori caucus has been extremely high.
Their spins masters know public memory is short.......
Wow, this is scandalous. Political manipulation of schoolchildren against a particular party, using lies. It's up there with bribing news media to support Labour's policy of misrepresenting TeTiriti and corrupting democracy.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.