A recent study (by Andrew Montfort of the Global Warming Policy Foundation) addressing the Net Zero policies of the United Kingdom government has calculated that heat pumps, which Climate ‘activists’ advocate to replace home heating (in that nation, and in Canada), do none of the things that their proponents claim. Heat pumps are neither more efficient than gas boilers, nor cheaper, and do a very expensive job of reducing carbon dioxide, ‘CO2’, emissions. Heat pumps eliminate those emissions at a cost of over £300 – ~CAD$400 – per tonne of CO2, which far exceeds the estimated cost of those emissions to global Gross Domestic Product. In summary, heat pumps are the antithesis of a true solution to a questionable ‘problem’.
The situation in the U.K. seems to favour heat pumps, more so than in Canada. The U.K. has a more moderate climate with milder winters. As heat pumps are more efficient in such environments, that would give them an advantage versus their use in Canada. In addition, natural gas prices are much higher in the U.K. than in Canada, and are likely to remain higher. This makes the heat pump option superficially seem better. Finally, gas boilers, the usual heating method in the U.K., are not as efficient as the forced air natural gas-fired furnaces commonly installed in Canada, which would seem to give the heat pump an advantage. Yet, all those things still do not help this touted Green replacement for traditional heating methods in attaining superiority.
An example of the cost differential: $10.84 per gigajoule, ‘GJ’ in early summer in British Columbia (Source: Fortis) for natural gas, including delivery and transport charges – but not adding carbon tax, or $0.039 per kilowatt-hour. With a natural gas furnace’s high efficiency rating of 95%, this brings a final cost of $0.041 per kWh.
At BC Hydro’s rate for higher use of $0.1422 per kWh, and a heat pump efficiency of 2.7 (according to a study by an engineer (David Elstrom: LinkedIn, February, 2020) – heat pumps deliver more heat per unit of energy input -costs $0.053 per kWh. So, aside from carbon taxes and other fees loaded onto natural gas bills, and not taking into account possible rebates for heat pump purchases, it is clear that gas furnaces are cheaper and possibly greener than heat pumps, even in mild coastal B.C., let alone chillier provinces.
Electric baseboard and electric forced air heating costs more in Canada than gas furnaces, even in relatively mild climates such as coastal British Columbia. This, despite relatively cheap hydroelectric power, (also cheap in Quebec and Manitoba but not Newfoundland and Labrador). Yet, electric heating is what the Climate Alarmists, including those in the current federal government, want to impose on Canadians (at least in new construction). Hydroelectric use is also near capacity.
The capital cost of heat pumps is generally higher than gas furnaces – and the operational costs will be much higher as well. These requirements, married with the other intrusive regulations that may be dreamed up by zealous officials, could make home ownership or rental even more expensive and unaffordable for Canada’s burgeoning population.
Along with prohibiting gas stoves, water heaters and dryers, this is one more ‘policy initiative’ Canadians should resist, strongly.
This article was first published HERE.
Ian Madsen is the Senior Policy Analyst at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy
1 comment:
I have always been very sceptical of heat pumps. Vast numbers of NZ houses only require heating some evenings. The whole of life world CO2 associated heat pumps needs to be considered, incluind manufacture, transport, maintenance, ultimate removal, scrapping. Myriads of aesthetically designed homes and apartments now sport a rusting battered droning heat pump in full view with exposed cabling prominent about. A nearby pensioner village and new apartments have all lost a huge proportion of their tiny verandah/decks to heat pumps. Vested interests support universities and some fresh doctorate student with no experience of the world contrives to prove efficacy of heat pumps (or many other devices or actions.) Sundry businessmen and lobbyists hound mps. Many with nothing to show for their existence see a chance for profile. Thus mania for heat pumps, insulation, double glazing, evs, etc etc is born. A new industry very lucrative for a few is spawned. The costs are born by those regarded as poor. No one dares question or reverse. ( We never hear exhortations to open laundry, bathroom, kitchen windows, vent clothes driers externally, wear warm woollen clothing, close off interior open spaces, dry clothes on a line etc etc as no money to be made from these actions)
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.