Foreign pharmaceutical approval agencies are well-resourced. They also tend to be cautious about approving drugs.
Under the Initiative’s proposed Rule of Two, drugs would automatically be approved in New Zealand if they had been approved by at least two trustworthy overseas approval agencies, unless Medsafe had extraordinary concerns about a particular medicine. But drugs so-approved would be reviewed if withdrawn from foreign markets.
“The Rule of Two would hasten access to safe medicines while imposing little risk,”
This research note draws on indicative work by two teams of Canterbury students.
Drugs rejected by Medsafe were unlikely to have been approved by two trustworthy overseas agencies. But the Rule of Two would have seen safe drugs approved between one and twelve years earlier than Medsafe. And Medsafe tended to move in tandem with overseas agencies in withdrawing drugs from the market, rather than moving more quickly.
“Medsafe approval is not the sole or even the primary barrier to access to new pharmaceuticals. But it is an unnecessary barrier for drugs already safely approved elsewhere, while worsening other barriers,”
In August, Pharmac proposed to decline 24 different pharmaceuticals’ funding applications because they saw no supplier willing to pursue Medsafe registration. One of those drugs was recommended for Australia’s Public Benefit Scheme later that month.
“America spends about half a billion dollars more per year evaluating drugs than New Zealand spends on buying them through Pharmac. If the FDA and another trustworthy agency say a drug is safe, is it likely Medsafe’s 60 staff will find something they missed?”
Click to read or download
Dr Eric Crampton is Chief Economist at the New Zealand Initiative. This article was first published HERE
This research note draws on indicative work by two teams of Canterbury students.
Drugs rejected by Medsafe were unlikely to have been approved by two trustworthy overseas agencies. But the Rule of Two would have seen safe drugs approved between one and twelve years earlier than Medsafe. And Medsafe tended to move in tandem with overseas agencies in withdrawing drugs from the market, rather than moving more quickly.
“Medsafe approval is not the sole or even the primary barrier to access to new pharmaceuticals. But it is an unnecessary barrier for drugs already safely approved elsewhere, while worsening other barriers,”
In August, Pharmac proposed to decline 24 different pharmaceuticals’ funding applications because they saw no supplier willing to pursue Medsafe registration. One of those drugs was recommended for Australia’s Public Benefit Scheme later that month.
“America spends about half a billion dollars more per year evaluating drugs than New Zealand spends on buying them through Pharmac. If the FDA and another trustworthy agency say a drug is safe, is it likely Medsafe’s 60 staff will find something they missed?”
Click to read or download
Dr Eric Crampton is Chief Economist at the New Zealand Initiative. This article was first published HERE
2 comments:
And then 40 people released from their pointless task to help reduce wage pressure in the economy.
What is there not to like, now the next dept for rationalization.
A good point Eric, but does raise the issue of whether NZ has enough economic muscle to be able afford drugs, perhaps expensive, that our two comparator countries might add to their "approved drug" list without qualm.
I would suspect that the arguements would continue on the line..."well great we have early approvals for x & y drugs but you've taken my drugs off the import list to pay for them "
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.