The impression we often get is they're horribly overcrowded, patients lying in corridors for hours in agony, constant panic stations.
Friday and Saturday nights are bedlam, we're told: drunks staggering around the place, people unleashing their stress and anger at the staff.
And in the winter, people with coughs and colds packing out the waiting area.
Hospitals are begging us to go to our GPs, even giving out vouchers to take the pressure off, because a lot of people can't afford to pay for a doctor's visit.
What the Medical Journal piece says is that actually, New Zealanders overall make fewer calls to A&E than people in other countries.
So, what does that tell us?
Do we need more A&Es? Or would it be better to spend a greater chunk of the health budget in primary care?
Have we fallen victim to a perceived need for the glamour projects like new hospitals?
Would more GPs on the ground, especially in rural New Zealand, improve our overall health?
And where do the privately run A&E centres fit in?
Free healthcare at the point of delivery —in other words you pay for it in your taxes— is on the face of it simpler and more cost-effective.
But the reality is that some GP surgeries are technically insolvent. Half our existing doctors are planning their retirement, and there's nowhere near enough new ones on the way to replace them.
I'm hoping we'll shed more light on this before six, but it's obviously a complex situation.
Dr Reti was making all the right noises when he was on with Mike this week.
He's repeatedly said the system is in crisis, and now's the time for him to show that a crisis can sometimes be an opportunity for real, radical change.
Tim Dower is a New Zealand journalist who works for Newstalk ZB as a newsreader and substitutes talkback announcer. This article was first published HERE
Hospitals are begging us to go to our GPs, even giving out vouchers to take the pressure off, because a lot of people can't afford to pay for a doctor's visit.
What the Medical Journal piece says is that actually, New Zealanders overall make fewer calls to A&E than people in other countries.
So, what does that tell us?
Do we need more A&Es? Or would it be better to spend a greater chunk of the health budget in primary care?
Have we fallen victim to a perceived need for the glamour projects like new hospitals?
Would more GPs on the ground, especially in rural New Zealand, improve our overall health?
And where do the privately run A&E centres fit in?
Free healthcare at the point of delivery —in other words you pay for it in your taxes— is on the face of it simpler and more cost-effective.
But the reality is that some GP surgeries are technically insolvent. Half our existing doctors are planning their retirement, and there's nowhere near enough new ones on the way to replace them.
I'm hoping we'll shed more light on this before six, but it's obviously a complex situation.
Dr Reti was making all the right noises when he was on with Mike this week.
He's repeatedly said the system is in crisis, and now's the time for him to show that a crisis can sometimes be an opportunity for real, radical change.
Tim Dower is a New Zealand journalist who works for Newstalk ZB as a newsreader and substitutes talkback announcer. This article was first published HERE
1 comment:
We need more emphasis on prevention. This would be a radical change in the direction of medicine.
This would mean doctors receiving more training in nutrition and less control by big pharma. Healthy life choices and nutrition are better determinants of health outcomes than access to medical personal and drug therapy however people don't seem to know this truth. Educate them about it.
I can remember the health department used to put out posters about eating fruit and vege.in waiting rooms, This has been replaced by waffle about equity.
More condemnation of junk food and bans on advertising it should be encouraged. I recently,asked a teenager what he had for lunch and he said "a handful of sweeties and a bottle of fanta'".I said to him "but that isn't actually food .".To which he replied "Isn't it"'.
In Finland from preschoolers up are provided with a free nutritious meal with the purpose of teaching small children to be accustomed to eating such food.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.